e anything between 1024 and 65535.
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53411/#review154795
---
On Nov. 2, 2016,
:24269
...
DEBUG: I1102 22:39:14.312568 46937 slave.cpp:915] New master detected at
master@127.0.0.1:24269
...
DEBUG: [ OK ] ExamplesTest.DiskFullFramework (17988 ms)
Thanks,
David Robinson
DOG_USEC / 2 microseconds. The message indicates
liveliness to systemd.
- David Robinson
On July 19, 2016, 1:14 a.m., Lawrence Wu wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://re
://reviews.apache.org/r/47209/diff/
Testing
---
make check
Also started a master and agent and captured a tcpdump to verify the connection
is only established _after_ the registration backoff.
Thanks,
David Robinson
://reviews.apache.org/r/47209/diff/
Testing
---
make check
Also started a master and agent and captured a tcpdump to verify the connection
is only established _after_ the registration backoff.
Thanks,
David Robinson
Also started a master and agent and captured a tcpdump to verify the connection
is only established _after_ the registration backoff.
Thanks,
David Robinson
://reviews.apache.org/r/47154/diff/
Testing
---
make check
Also started a master and agent and captured a tcpdump to verify the connection
is only established _after_ the registration backoff.
Thanks,
David Robinson
To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47080/#review132205
---
On May 6, 2016, 10:51 p.m., David Robinson wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
/47080/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
make tests
make check
Also started a master and agent and captured a tcpdump to verify the connection
is only established _after_ the registration backoff.
Thanks,
David Robinson
tests
Also started a master and agent and captured a tcpdump to verify the connection
is only established _after_ the registration backoff.
Thanks,
David Robinson
> On March 15, 2016, 8:02 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > Is it feasible/portable to have a test case for this change?
>
> Cong Wang wrote:
> Yes, like in our case, you can create some socket or device file and try
> to remove the directory contains it, it would fail without this patch.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42980/#review117040
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Robinson
On Jan. 29, 2016, 10:46
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41245/#review109965
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Robinson
On Dec. 11, 2015, 5:20 a.m
loopback
interface
- David Robinson
On Dec. 9, 2015, 11:15 p.m., Cong Wang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://revie
14 matches
Mail list logo