Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11193497
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#issuecomment-39291772
BTW if you are okay with this, Xiangrui, I can merge it -- the code looks
good to me. But let me know if you have other ideas on names, I don't 100% like
this name either.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11193525
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11193583
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user pwendell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299
[WIP] Clean up and simplify Spark configuration
Over time as we've added more deployment modes, this have gotten a bit
unwieldy with user-facing configuration options in Spark. Going forward we'll
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11193626
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11193650
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#issuecomment-39292232
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#discussion_r11193654
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +373,37 @@ class SparkContext(
}
/**
+ * Read a
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11193678
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300
[SPARK-1332] Improve Spark Streaming's Network Receiver and InputDStream
API [WIP]
The current Network Receiver API makes it slightly complicated to right a
new receiver as one needs to create an
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#discussion_r11193752
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +373,37 @@ class SparkContext(
}
/**
+ * Read a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-39292703
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/295#issuecomment-39292787
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13664/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-39292788
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/295#issuecomment-39292783
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39292938
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13665/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39292937
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#issuecomment-39293084
@mateiz I agree that neither `wholeTextFile` nor `wholeTextFiles` is a good
name. Shall we wait for a day or two and see whether there are better
suggestions? This PR is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39293201
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39293197
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#issuecomment-39293384
`sc.textFileRecords(...)`, `sc.textFileElements()`? Guess that's not great
either :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39293478
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/297#issuecomment-39294062
merged. thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#issuecomment-39294300
How about textFiles() ? @liancheng recommended it just now.
2014-4-2 PM2:40Ãà Patrick Wendell notificati...@github.comôµÃ£º
sc.textFileRecords(...),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/297#issuecomment-39294686
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/298#issuecomment-39294687
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13668/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/297#issuecomment-39294688
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13667/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39294689
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194622
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -21,12 +21,11 @@ import java.io._
import java.net.URI
import
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194637
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/284#discussion_r11194651
--- Diff:
project/spark-style/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scalastyle/SpaceAfterColonStyleCheck.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user haoyuan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194656
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -206,6 +206,53 @@
scopetest/scope
/dependency
dependency
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-39295721
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39295724
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13669/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39295722
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/299#issuecomment-39295723
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-39295725
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13671/
---
If your project
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194776
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -59,6 +57,17 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39295925
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194943
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194937
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11194950
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11195032
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/297
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/301
Renamed stageIdToActiveJob to jobIdToActiveJob.
This data structure was misused and, as a result, later renamed to an
incorrect name.
This data structure seems to have gotten into
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/301#issuecomment-39297208
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/301#issuecomment-39297297
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11195271
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11195315
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/246#issuecomment-39297535
Hey @sundeepn, so there's one other problem with your change which is that
the code you added in the UI to clean up the stages for a cancelled job doesn't
quite
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11195342
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11195474
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/TachyonStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11195556
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -277,11 +277,18 @@ object SparkBuild extends Build {
val slf4jVersion = 1.7.5
val excludeNetty =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39298583
Build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39298584
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13673/
---
If your project
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#issuecomment-39298749
Left some minor comments and a couple higher level questions -- it's likely
these questions have been discussed before, I just want to make sure because
they could
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/245#issuecomment-39299309
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/245#issuecomment-39299299
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39300410
Can you start a new test please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/252#issuecomment-39300760
`swallowFiles`? It seems to me `wholeTextFiles` is still the best
candidate, which also reminds me Whole Foods and makes me feel hungry ... This
is why I recommended
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39300850
Jenkins, retest this please,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39301237
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39301253
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39301776
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39301788
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user witgo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/234
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/301#issuecomment-39301994
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/301#issuecomment-39303096
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user LIDIAgroup commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/216#discussion_r11196809
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/discretization/ArrayAccumulator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11196822
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39304970
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39304956
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#discussion_r11197597
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/VectorRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/245#issuecomment-39308190
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13676/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39308221
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39308189
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13677/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/245#issuecomment-39308187
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39308188
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39308222
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13678/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39309710
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39309694
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39309937
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13680/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39309936
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39310264
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39310274
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/285#discussion_r11198762
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/ColumnTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -55,10 +56,8 @@ class ColumnTypeSuite extends FunSuite {
GitHub user mridulm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/302
fix computePreferredLocations signature to not depend on underlying
implementation
Change to Map and Set - not mutable HashMap and HashSet
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/302#issuecomment-39313191
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/302#issuecomment-39313257
Jenkins, this is ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/302#issuecomment-39314000
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user darabos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/276#discussion_r11199524
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/impl/EdgePartition.scala ---
@@ -84,19 +87,13 @@ class EdgePartition[@specialized(Char, Int, Boolean,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39314778
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13679/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39314774
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39315675
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13681/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39315674
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39316766
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39316778
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/273#issuecomment-39319966
I noticed that you added explicit return type to all public methods...I
think there is a PR about this (but I cannot find it now.)en...is that
merged? @pwendell
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39321329
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13683/
---
If your project
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
