Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49047222
QA tests have started for PR 1112. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16681/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1404#issuecomment-49047341
QA results for PR 1404:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1404#issuecomment-49048202
QA results for PR 1404:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/634#issuecomment-49048527
I just thought of something bad here. Now the default behavior is to wait
for 0% and we have removed the bit of sleep there so if someone is just using
the default
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1404#issuecomment-49048633
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-49049288
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1404#issuecomment-49049597
QA tests have started for PR 1404. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16682/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1404#issuecomment-49049544
QA results for PR 1404:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-49051002
Merged. Thanks for your contribution!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1196#issuecomment-49051107
QA tests have started for PR 1196. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16683/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/991#issuecomment-49053374
QA tests have started for PR 991. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16684/consoleFull
---
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49054435
Thanks, I'll test out the 0.23 code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1419
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49058593
If the executor is running out of memory, what good does it make to call
`System.gc()` on the driver side? You're calling it in a SparkContext listener,
which as far as I
Github user avulanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-49058671
Thanks! I'll be glad to contribute more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49059065
QA results for PR 1112:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brcase class
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1411#issuecomment-49061090
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49061792
`SparkContext.cleaner` will clean up no reference RDD, shuffle and
broadcast.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49061972
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/991#issuecomment-49062165
QA tests have started for PR 991. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16686/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49062792
QA tests have started for PR 1112. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16687/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1404#issuecomment-49063020
QA results for PR 1404:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49065703
BTW, there is no `finalize()` that I can find in the Spark tree, so the
only thing `System.gc()` is achieving here is freeing memory.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49065130
I'm not sure I understood your last comment, but anyway: these object had
references to them at some point. What you're suggesting is that, at some
point, those
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1409#issuecomment-49066268
Testing that patch, it seems to have fixed the deadlock we were seeing in
production.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user staple opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1421
[SPARK-2314] Override collect and take in JavaSchemaRDD, forwarding to
SchemaRDD implementations.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49064468
Explicitly clear the means to keep all the reference object, for Java
programmers ,it is very unfriendly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1421#issuecomment-49066976
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49067472
Yes , `System.gc()` is just advice, may not really free resources. But RDD
no close method,can only be cleared by `ContextCleaner`
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user tsudukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1094#issuecomment-49069859
OK, thank you for your reply.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49070018
So your whole issue is with the `FileNotFoundException` being logged? Or,
aside from that, is there a user-visible side-effect, such as the wrong job
status being
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49072342
Just as a thought exercise: what if you change `ContextCleaner.stop()` to
interrupt the cleaning thread, wait for it to finish, and then manually clean
all buffered
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49072476
Yes this solution is not perfect. I have been thinking about this problem.
BTW the `runGC ` method run GC and make sure it actually has run.
reference
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#discussion_r14953652
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskEventListener.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1393#issuecomment-49072664
Yeah API stability is very important. I keep banging on about the flip-side
-- freezing an API that may still need to change. You get a different important
problem. I'm
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49072778
@witgo the problem is that there's no reliable way to make sure the gc has
run. Have you tried with all available gcs in the Oracle vm? Have you tried
with different vms?
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#discussion_r14953877
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskEventListener.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/991#issuecomment-49074313
QA results for PR 991:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brtrait Lifecycle
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1351#issuecomment-49074527
Can you add [SQL] to the title please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49074742
I'm sorry, my English is poor. The problem now is we do not have a reliable
solution to the RDD is cleared. Close this first?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49075062
QA results for PR 1112:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brcase class
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49075444
`runGC` method's main problem is likely to run for a long time and still
didn't work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49076040
In my tests, `runGC` method is normally working in jdk7_45.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112#issuecomment-49076295
Looks good. Thanks @witgo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1112
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49076858
@witgo you do know that the Oracle VM has 3 different GCs, configurable
using command line arguments, right? Have you tried all of them (and
combinations thereof, since
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49077092
@manishamde It looks like MIMA is complaining about binary compatibility.
Could you please check out the errors in the Jenkins log, which give commands,
e.g.:
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1387#issuecomment-49077845
Ok, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow I try it on the way you said. I only
tested the default gc configuration and I will test the other.
---
If your project is set up
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1371#issuecomment-49079782
Create issue #SPARK-2494 to track this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1094#issuecomment-49083255
@rahulsinghaliitd can you please upmerge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49084154
QA tests have started for PR 886. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16688/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1330#issuecomment-49085302
Jenkins, retest this pleae.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1330#issuecomment-49085313
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1421#issuecomment-49085915
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1417#issuecomment-49085969
Merging this in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1330#issuecomment-49085897
QA tests have started for PR 1330. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16690/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1351#issuecomment-49086571
QA tests have started for PR 1351. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16692/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1421#issuecomment-49086561
QA tests have started for PR 1421. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16691/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1415#issuecomment-49090832
@rxin IIRC at one point we changed this before and it caused a performance
regression for our perf suite so we reverted it. At the time I think we were
running on
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1337#issuecomment-49091029
okay LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1372#issuecomment-49091169
@fireflyc will you have a chance to address the comments so we can merge
this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1402
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1411
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1411#issuecomment-49092118
Thanks for reviewing @yhuai. I've merged this into master and 1.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1396
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1414#issuecomment-49092504
@liancheng, please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1406
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1359#issuecomment-49093280
Thanks! Merged into master and 1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1359
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14964217
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#issuecomment-49094992
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/637#issuecomment-49094948
ping...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1331#issuecomment-49094964
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#issuecomment-49095245
QA tests have started for PR 731. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16693/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49095921
QA results for PR 886:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49097254
@manishamde The @DeveloperApi does not seem to have fixed MIMA's
complaints. I think that modifying the spark/project/MimaExcludes.scala file
should do the trick.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1407#issuecomment-49098158
QA results for PR 1407:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49098644
@jkbradley I will make the changes that you mentioned.
The documentation from the MimaExcludes.scala says the the DeveloperApi
classes will be skipped. May be
GitHub user giwa opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1422
follow pep8 None should be compared using is or is not
http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
## Programming Recommendations
- Comparisons to singletons like None should always
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1422#issuecomment-49098978
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1421#issuecomment-49099033
QA results for PR 1421:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1351#issuecomment-49098508
QA results for PR 1351:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1393#issuecomment-49099667
QA tests have started for PR 1393. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16694/consoleFull
---
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1415#issuecomment-49099980
Yea - stability seems much more important than a small performance gain
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49100250
@manishamde Thanks! I'll look into the MIMA issue. The code looks good,
and it tests fine vs. scikit-learn on some datasets I've tried.
My only comment now is
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1415#issuecomment-49100370
Only the codec names are stored in the event logs; no other information is
currently recorded. But this change isn't really breaking anything in that
area. (And, by
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1415#issuecomment-49100573
FYI filed JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2496
Compression streams should write its codec info to the stream
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1422#issuecomment-49100610
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1370#discussion_r14967550
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTypes.scala ---
@@ -365,20 +366,23 @@ private[parquet] object ParquetTypesConverter
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1422#issuecomment-49101045
QA tests have started for PR 1422. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16695/consoleFull
---
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49102109
@jkbradley Thanks a lot for taking a look at the MIMA issue. Also many
thanks for testing out versus scikit-learn! I will update the documentation to
speak about
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1383#issuecomment-49102405
Thanks for submitting this. Is there any way we can construct a unit test
for this as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1383#discussion_r14968203
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1223,6 +1223,8 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/** Returns true
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1383#issuecomment-49104351
OK. I will add a comment for my change.
And I will also add test case for this issue to FailureSuite.scala. Is that
proper?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-49104473
@manishamde Apparently MIMA is a bit fragile currently, but is being
worked on: [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2069] I added a
subtask for this specific
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1393#issuecomment-49104938
Wise words Matei! anyway here's another cut that preserves the original
API. Tests are still running. Up to you guys' judgment on whether it's
worthwhile.
---
If your
GitHub user concretevitamin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1423
[SQL] Synchronize on a lock when using scala reflection inside data type
objects.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1423#issuecomment-49105217
Jenkins, add to whitelist please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1330#issuecomment-49105352
Could you paste exactly which warnings you are eliminating? I don't see any
warnings in our master jenkins build that seem relevant to these changes.
---
If your
101 - 200 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
