Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1754#issuecomment-55998415
@pwendell I have updated the regular expression.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1754#issuecomment-55998761
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20526/consoleFull)
for PR 1754 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2443#issuecomment-55999096
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20524/consoleFull)
for PR 2443 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2397#discussion_r17710806
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -166,3 +166,20 @@ case class DescribeCommand(child: SparkPlan,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-55999652
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20525/consoleFull)
for PR 2421 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2294#issuecomment-56001230
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20527/consoleFull)
for PR 2294 at commit
Github user ravipesala commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2397#discussion_r17711807
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -166,3 +166,20 @@ case class DescribeCommand(child: SparkPlan,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2397#issuecomment-56001845
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20528/consoleFull)
for PR 2397 at commit
Github user ravipesala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2397#issuecomment-56001847
Updated as per comments. Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#discussion_r17711980
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -221,19 +221,35 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2426#issuecomment-56002947
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20529/consoleFull)
for PR 2426 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-56002944
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20530/consoleFull)
for PR 1977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1754#issuecomment-56003311
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20526/consoleFull)
for PR 1754 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17712697
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2439#issuecomment-56004216
@rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-56004283
@JoshRosen @mateiz I had addressed all your comments. The
IResulterIterator can be iterated multiple times now, also can be pickled.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903#issuecomment-56004578
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17712911
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903#issuecomment-56004870
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20532/consoleFull)
for PR 1903 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17713126
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17713233
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17713298
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2397#issuecomment-56005574
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20528/consoleFull)
for PR 2397 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17713594
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2294#issuecomment-56006229
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20527/consoleFull)
for PR 2294 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17713674
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#discussion_r17713666
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2426#issuecomment-56008457
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20529/consoleFull)
for PR 2426 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-56009374
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20530/consoleFull)
for PR 1977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903#issuecomment-56009542
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20532/consoleFull)
for PR 1903 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-56010532
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20533/consoleFull)
for PR 2421 at commit
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444
[SPARK-3584] sbin/slaves doesn't work when we use password authentication
for SSH
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#issuecomment-56014482
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20534/consoleFull)
for PR 2444 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-56014536
@WangTaoTheTonic You can let Jenkins works by saying like retest this
please or test this please without extra push.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-56015001
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20535/consoleFull)
for PR 2421 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2403#issuecomment-56015430
I guess we will have to exclude those in MimaExcludes.scala. If this
happens too often, then *may be* we can ignore toString for all classes
possible.
---
If your
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#issuecomment-56018809
Though Hive would throw exception when cast int to date, I think it doesn't
matter if not obey, because query exit with exception is considered a failure
in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#issuecomment-56018945
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20536/consoleFull)
for PR 2425 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#issuecomment-56018966
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20537/consoleFull)
for PR 2344 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#discussion_r17718951
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -177,6 +223,8 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-56019226
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20533/consoleFull)
for PR 2421 at commit
Github user ravipesala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2381#issuecomment-56020207
OK. Closing this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ravipesala closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2381
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ravipesala closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2390
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ravipesala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2390#issuecomment-56020320
OK. Closing this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-56020425
@sarutak Thanks I see, thought only commiters can do it this way.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#issuecomment-56020878
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20534/consoleFull)
for PR 2444 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#issuecomment-56022043
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20537/consoleFull)
for PR 2344 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421#issuecomment-56023011
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20535/consoleFull)
for PR 2421 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2425#issuecomment-56024795
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20536/consoleFull)
for PR 2425 at commit
GitHub user WangTaoTheTonic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2445
[SPARK-3589][Minor]remove redundant code
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/WangTaoTheTonic/spark removeRedundant
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2445#issuecomment-56026443
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20538/consoleFull)
for PR 2445 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#issuecomment-56028120
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20539/consoleFull)
for PR 2344 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2445#issuecomment-56032317
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20538/consoleFull)
for PR 2445 at commit
Github user mohangadm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2323#issuecomment-56032431
I have experienced the same kind of problem when using Avro with spark
streaming API.
If avro message is simple, its fine. but if the avro message has
Union/Arrays
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#issuecomment-56032559
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20539/consoleFull)
for PR 2344 at commit
GitHub user larryxiao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2446
[SPARK-1987] EdgePartitionBuilder: More memory-efficient graph construction
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1987
To save overhead of Edge objects, separate an array of Edge objects
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2446#issuecomment-56042212
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2232#issuecomment-56042913
From the other pr we need to keep backwards compatibility for the env
variables, the configs should be fine. I believe this pr matches the behavior
described below.
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1573#issuecomment-56044590
@renozhang can you address my comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user patmcdonough opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447
SPARK-3389: New public method for RDD's to have consistent way of obtain...
...ing the number of RDD partitions across languages.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56048202
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mattf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17730762
--- Diff: sbin/slaves.sh ---
@@ -67,20 +69,26 @@ fi
if [ $HOSTLIST = ]; then
if [ $SPARK_SLAVES = ]; then
-export
Github user baishuo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2226#discussion_r17731044
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -522,6 +523,52 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends
Github user mattf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17730829
--- Diff: sbin/slaves.sh ---
@@ -67,20 +69,26 @@ fi
if [ $HOSTLIST = ]; then
if [ $SPARK_SLAVES = ]; then
-export
Github user laserson commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56059045
fyi: I think you referenced the wrong JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user patmcdonough commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56061006
thanks for catching that @laserson! Fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user timothysc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1860#issuecomment-56064543
Just for crossref MESOS-1688 has been committed and will be part of 0.21.0
release cycle.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#discussion_r17740875
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,23 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ *
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56071597
LGTM pending a minor comment and tests. Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56072266
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20540/consoleFull)
for PR 2447 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2421
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-56072999
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20541/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2443#issuecomment-56073816
This is a very straightforward change, so I'm going to merge this. However,
@srowen feel free to propose tweaks to this in a follow on PR if you think
there are any
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#discussion_r17741897
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,23 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ *
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2443
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/991#issuecomment-56074326
Let's close this issue for now given the comments from me and @rxin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user witgo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/991
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#discussion_r17743007
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerArguments.scala
---
@@ -44,30 +51,27 @@ private[spark] class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#discussion_r17743439
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/WorkerArguments.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +48,25 @@ private[spark] class WorkerArguments(args:
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17743713
--- Diff: .gitignore ---
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ conf/*.sh
conf/*.properties
conf/*.conf
conf/*.xml
+conf/slaves
--- End diff --
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#discussion_r17744702
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/WorkerArguments.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +48,25 @@ private[spark] class WorkerArguments(args:
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#discussion_r17745104
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,23 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56081115
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20540/consoleFull)
for PR 2447 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#discussion_r17745188
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/WorkerArguments.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +48,25 @@ private[spark] class WorkerArguments(args:
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2448
[SPARK-3592] [SQL] [PySpark] support applySchema to RDD of Row
Fix the issue when applySchema() to an RDD of Row.
Also add type mapping for BinaryType.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2448#issuecomment-56081817
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20544/consoleFull)
for PR 2448 at commit
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903#issuecomment-56082379
Unrelated failure in Streaming. Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-56082465
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20541/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#discussion_r17745821
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/WorkerArguments.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +48,25 @@ private[spark] class WorkerArguments(args:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2435#issuecomment-56082554
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20545/consoleFull)
for PR 2435 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#discussion_r17745881
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerArguments.scala
---
@@ -44,30 +50,19 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903#issuecomment-56083212
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20546/consoleFull)
for PR 1903 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2294#discussion_r17746583
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -197,4 +201,368 @@ private[mllib] object BLAS extends Serializable {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2448#issuecomment-56084672
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20547/consoleFull)
for PR 2448 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1940#issuecomment-56084970
Yeah I think we should just change it to say that the kill request has been
acknowledge, but since killing as asynchronous and best-effort, it may not have
stopped
GitHub user Victsm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2449
[SPARK-3560] Fixed setting spark.jars system property in yarn-cluster mode
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Victsm/spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2294#issuecomment-56085981
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20548/consoleFull)
for PR 2294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2449#issuecomment-56086357
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2426#issuecomment-56086638
This seems fine to me. For very common file editors seems okay to support
them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
