Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57762293
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57762288
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21242/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
[`e108ec1`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57761606
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21241/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
[`d817de8`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57761610
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user ash211 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#issuecomment-57760828
This looks very reasonable. Counting the executor's bookkeeping core
against the resources also seems much more correct than pretending it doesn't
exist like before.
Github user ash211 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#discussion_r18382851
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -253,6 +253,17 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
spark.execut
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57760182
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57760172
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21239/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
[`6570494`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57758618
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57758615
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21237/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
[`ba77ca4`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57758335
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21242/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
[`e108ec1`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57758118
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21241/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
[`d817de8`](https://github.com/ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57753844
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57753841
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21240/consoleFull)
for PR 2633 at commit
[`9dd7826`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57753705
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21240/consoleFull)
for PR 2633 at commit
[`9dd7826`](https://github.com/ap
Github user bijaybisht commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57753405
Fixed for Apache license headers.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2605#issuecomment-57753034
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57752832
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21239/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
[`6570494`](https://github.com/ap
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18381560
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/MetricsSystem.scala
---
@@ -98,10 +96,45 @@ private[spark] class MetricsSystem private (
sinks
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2605#issuecomment-57751730
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57751658
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21237/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
[`ba77ca4`](https://github.com/ap
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18381532
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -187,6 +187,15 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
val m
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57751031
@chouqin Yes, separate PR sounds good. Let's remember to create a JIRA. We
can also try to estimate it based upon the Spark conf and dataset size.
---
If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57748176
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57748170
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21236/consoleFull)
for PR 2501 at commit
[`0ea889e`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2638#issuecomment-57746994
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/259/consoleFull)
for PR 2638 at commit
[`ec213c1`](https://github.com/
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2616#issuecomment-57746732
Comment out the print statement in merge_pr that causes the failure.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> Tried merging bu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#issuecomment-57746419
Thanks! I've merged this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2616#issuecomment-57745439
Tried merging but it failed :(
@kayousterhout what did you end up doing to merge this the first time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user giwa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18379709
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/dstream.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,624 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contri
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57744198
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21236/consoleFull)
for PR 2501 at commit
[`0ea889e`](https://github.com/ap
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2605#issuecomment-57742306
I took a look and found where the behavior that Marcelo is observing is
occurring in YARN. (For future reference), when the ResourceManager's
ClientRMService starts up, it
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2635
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2638#issuecomment-57741192
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/259/consoleFull)
for PR 2638 at commit
[`ec213c1`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2639#issuecomment-57740737
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user tsudukim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2639
[SPARK-3774] typo comment in bin/utils.sh
Modified the comment of bin/utils.sh.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tsudukim/spark f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2497#issuecomment-57740477
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2497#issuecomment-57740476
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21235/consoleFull)
for PR 2497 at commit
[`61162a6`](https://github.com/a
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57740051
LGTM except for some minor issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18378532
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#discussion_r18378504
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,22 +17,61 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.hive
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#discussion_r18378483
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -305,7 +300,7 @@ private[hive] case class MetastoreRelation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57739363
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57739361
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21234/consoleFull)
for PR 2595 at commit
[`db0d24a`](https://github.com/a
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18378352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -52,12 +52,18 @@ private[spark] class PythonRDD(
accumulator: Accu
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#discussion_r18378336
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TestHive.scala
---
@@ -428,7 +429,7 @@ class TestHiveContext(sc: SparkContext) extends
HiveCont
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#discussion_r18378326
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CacheManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57739142
Hmm, strange test failure:
```
[info] - block generator throttling *** FAILED ***
[info] org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException was thrown.
(Net
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57738844
Seems like the unit test are failing with GC-overhead-too-high errors.
@davies Please take a look. I can help out if you want.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2469#issuecomment-57738768
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21233/consoleFull)
for PR 2469 at commit
[`d121883`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2469#issuecomment-57738773
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18378148
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/dstream.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,624 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contri
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18378110
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/context.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,305 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contri
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18378095
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/context.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,305 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contri
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#discussion_r18377923
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/SameResultSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mohnishkodnani commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2044#issuecomment-57737832
Can we have this take a parent directory that has other subdirectories with
parquet files, instead of the parquet files being the immediate children of the
directo
Github user chouqin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57737757
@manishamde I think `maxMemoryInMB` is now setting for executors.
Executor's memory is by default bigger than driver's memory(1G vs 512M), but it
also needs to store a pa
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2628
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2628#issuecomment-57736057
Thanks, merging this into master and 1.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623#issuecomment-57734982
Hey @scwf can you update the title and the description in the JIRA? It's
now inconsistent with what this PR actually does.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2563#discussion_r18377127
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -62,6 +63,12 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
def __ne__(self, other):
return not self.__eq__(other)
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57734254
@chouqin I just took a look at the PR. This is excellent. I don't have any
more comments to add apart from what has been discussed already.
Very interested to
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57734206
I followed the instructions at http://stackoverflow.com/a/14408381/590203
to generate a self-signed certificate, but unfortunately I see errors when I
try to browse to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2497#issuecomment-57733873
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21235/consoleFull)
for PR 2497 at commit
[`61162a6`](https://github.com/ap
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623#issuecomment-57733466
Ok, merging this again into master and 1.1. Thanks @scwf.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57733269
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21232/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
[`ee62bb7`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57733279
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57733203
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21234/consoleFull)
for PR 2595 at commit
[`db0d24a`](https://github.com/ap
Github user chouqin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2595#issuecomment-57733146
@jkbradley thanks for your comments, I have changed my code, could you
please have a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2616#issuecomment-57733000
@marmbrus Let's try to merge this one to master and see whether Jenkins
accepts it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2469#issuecomment-57732513
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21233/consoleFull)
for PR 2469 at commit
[`d121883`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2563#issuecomment-57732079
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21227/consoleFull)
for PR 2563 at commit
[`81e28fb`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2563#issuecomment-57732086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623#issuecomment-57731789
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2623#issuecomment-57731785
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21228/consoleFull)
for PR 2623 at commit
[`10a4437`](https://github.com/a
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57731222
Ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57731180
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57731178
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21229/consoleFull)
for PR 2501 at commit
[`1e23287`](https://github.com/a
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57731094
The table in the documentation should include `spark.ui.https.enabled`,
too; looks like it's missing now, which was confusing.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57730857
Yes, here i did not change it, because "http://joshs-mbp:4041"; will
redirect to https url
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57730551
I'm testing this out locally with my own keystore and truststore. Still
debugging some issues (maybe I've misconfigured my keys), but I noticed that
even with HTTPS en
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57730092
We should probably update the docstrings to remove all references to
ThreadLocal, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2638#issuecomment-57729963
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#issuecomment-57729739
Yes - I mention the need for a read API for this in my comment above, if we
want this to be public.
The current directory name is used as the final log name, but w
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-57729754
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21232/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
[`ee62bb7`](https://github.com/ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57729657
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-57729651
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21226/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
[`37fe06f`](https://github.com/a
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2638
[SPARK-3771][SQL] AppendingParquetOutputFormat should use reflection to
prevent breaking binary-compatibility.
Original problem is
[SPARK-3764](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3764).
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57727917
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57727911
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21230/consoleFull)
for PR 2633 at commit
[`2002151`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57727877
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21230/consoleFull)
for PR 2633 at commit
[`2002151`](https://github.com/ap
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-57727001
ok to test. Hey @bijaybisht can you open an associated JIRA for this PR?
See how other PRs are opened.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#issuecomment-57726091
Hey @vanzin I will take a more detailed look shortly. From a quick glance
it seems that now we encode the metadata in the first part of the log file and
use a header m
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2501#issuecomment-57726136
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21229/consoleFull)
for PR 2501 at commit
[`1e23287`](https://github.com/ap
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57725962
Hey, sorry for the delay; I've been swamped with other work. I'm going to
take a look right now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#issuecomment-57725678
Have added redirect from http to https and updated docs. Some directions as
follows
1 There is no changes for web ui when not set ```spark.ui.https.enabled```
2 When
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18374241
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/dstream.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,624 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# c
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18374226
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/dstream.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,624 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# c
1 - 100 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
