Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1484#issuecomment-72528593
Yes, it would be nice to add feature discretization to MLlib. We had a PP,
but as you've tried it doesn't scale well. I don't have concrete scalable
algorithms in mind
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4051#issuecomment-72530870
Alright, in summary, the proposal here is to default the min to 0 and the
max to Int.Max, and add a new `initialExecutors` config that defaults to the
min. On second
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4293#issuecomment-72534397
@sryza the fact that we have a test case failing I think is enough of a
reason to not do something too drastic here. How about just changing it to
logWarning for now?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4257#issuecomment-72534355
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4293#issuecomment-72534424
Looks like the test failures are legit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2813#issuecomment-72534368
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4300#issuecomment-72534476
LGTM. Another thing we could do is just remove the `--spark-version` option
since it defaults to the latest release of Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#issuecomment-72534474
[Test build #26533 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26533/consoleFull)
for PR 4106 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72540524
[Test build #26540 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26540/consoleFull)
for PR 4299 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#issuecomment-72540606
[Test build #26531 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26531/consoleFull)
for PR 3833 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4258#issuecomment-72543087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-72544829
That latest test passing was before I added the class tag to firstParent;
the next will be with the class tag added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#discussion_r23961901
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api.scala ---
@@ -171,6 +171,33 @@ private[sql] trait DataFrameSpecificApi {
def
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#discussion_r23961862
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api.scala ---
@@ -171,6 +171,33 @@ private[sql] trait DataFrameSpecificApi {
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4314#issuecomment-72547711
[Test build #26546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26546/consoleFull)
for PR 4314 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3850#issuecomment-72547861
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3850#issuecomment-72547846
[Test build #26529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26529/consoleFull)
for PR 3850 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4220#issuecomment-72549138
I've merged this PR into `branch-1.1` (1.1.2), so feel free to close it
(GitHub won't auto-close PRs that are opened against maintenance branches).
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#issuecomment-72550665
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#issuecomment-72550651
[Test build #26543 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26543/consoleFull)
for PR 3833 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72552049
[Test build #26548 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26548/consoleFull)
for PR 3571 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1484#issuecomment-72528802
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4306#issuecomment-72530762
LGTM except minor inline comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4293#issuecomment-72530752
[Test build #26525 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26525/consoleFull)
for PR 4293 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4293#issuecomment-72530765
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-72532830
[Test build #26526 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26526/consoleFull)
for PR 4253 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1093#issuecomment-72534517
[Test build #26534 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26534/consoleFull)
for PR 1093 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23958696
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -47,9 +49,13 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) extends
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#discussion_r23958649
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -282,7 +282,9 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
if
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72544592
I built this branch under Windows and tested it out using `spark-shell`; I
was able to reproduce the original bug and can confirm that this patch fixes
it, so I'm
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-72544680
[Test build #26526 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26526/consoleFull)
for PR 4253 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4270
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4314
[SQL] Correct the default size of TimestampType and expose NumericType
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yhuai/spark minor
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4221#issuecomment-72549252
Let's leave this PR open for a few days until we complete the 1.2.1 release
voting, then I'll merge it into `branch-1.2` (1.2.2).
---
If your project is set up for
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72551467
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23951392
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -47,9 +49,13 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#discussion_r23954862
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -18,30 +18,42 @@
package
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4051
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72538475
Ah, the Git timeout problem resurfaces once again :(.
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user MiguelPeralvo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4300#issuecomment-72542008
I think that's even a better option. I'm happy to propose it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72544044
@JoshRosen I've just added the documentation. I hope there is enough of it
:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72544031
[Test build #26544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26544/consoleFull)
for PR 3571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3347#issuecomment-72545572
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3347#issuecomment-72545561
[Test build #26532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26532/consoleFull)
for PR 3347 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#discussion_r23962899
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitUtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4316
[Doc] Minor: Fixes several formatting issues
Fixes several minor formatting issues in the [Continuous Compilation] [1]
section.
[1]:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jacek-lewandowski closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4220
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4314#issuecomment-72549399
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72549420
@jacek-lewandowski Thanks for adding docs; I'll look over them now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#discussion_r23964277
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -142,9 +148,39 @@ import org.apache.spark.network.sasl.SecretKeyHolder
*
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#discussion_r23953370
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -334,6 +335,71 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#discussion_r23954570
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -18,30 +18,42 @@
package
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72531678
Alright, LGTM thanks a lot @lianhuiwang I'm merging this into master. We
can fix the SPARK_HOME issue separately.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4293#discussion_r23956870
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/NewHadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -29,16 +29,14 @@ import
org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.{CombineFileSplit,
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4313
[SPARK-5514] DataFrame.collect should call executeCollect
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark SPARK-5514
Alternatively you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-72541454
[Test build #26541 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26541/consoleFull)
for PR 4216 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4258#issuecomment-72543067
[Test build #26528 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26528/consoleFull)
for PR 4258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#issuecomment-72543176
[Test build #26543 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26543/consoleFull)
for PR 3833 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-72543219
[Test build #26542 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26542/consoleFull)
for PR 4253 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72544929
[Test build #26545 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26545/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#discussion_r23961981
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -618,8 +619,84 @@ class DataFrame protected[sql](
*/
@Experimental
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user medale opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4315
[SPARK-3039] [BUILD] Spark assembly for new hadoop API (hadoop 2) contai...
...ns avro-mapred for
hadoop 1 API had been marked as resolved but did not work for at least some
builds due
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72551042
[Test build #26544 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26544/consoleFull)
for PR 3571 at commit
Github user selvinsource commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3062#issuecomment-72551243
Either approach has its pros and cons and I don't have a strong argument in
favor of any of the two.
R, for instance, use a similar approach to what I have
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#discussion_r23964702
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -142,9 +148,39 @@ import org.apache.spark.network.sasl.SecretKeyHolder
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72552424
[Test build #26545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26545/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72552433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3062#issuecomment-72552402
The R case is slightly different because the `pmml` package is maintained
separately from other packages. @srowen , are you okay with the interface I
proposed?
---
If
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23951634
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -47,9 +49,13 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager) extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4309
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4293#issuecomment-72538956
Ah, so the failing tests expose the possibility that someone could write
their own `InputFormat` that doesn't reuse a single object, and caching that
would be fine. So
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4270#issuecomment-72539246
Merging this. Thanks for catching and fixing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#discussion_r23962607
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitUtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#issuecomment-72551055
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ksakellis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23953114
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -472,12 +512,12 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab)
extends
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4220#issuecomment-72529009
@JoshRosen is it ok to go now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#discussion_r23954974
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/GeneralizedLinearAlgorithm.scala
---
@@ -107,6 +124,12 @@ abstract class
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72532026
Ok LGTM thanks a lot @lianhuiwang I'm merging this into master. We can fix
the SPARK_HOME issue separately later. Could you file a JIRA for it?
---
If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-72532059
That last commit added the transient tag back and uses firstParent in
isCheckpointed, per @mengxr 's suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3839#issuecomment-72533555
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4304#discussion_r23957512
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/PCA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4220#issuecomment-72540322
@jacek-lewandowski This looks good to me, so I'll merge it in a few
minutes. It looks like your PRs against the other branches have also been
updated, so I'll pull
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3062#issuecomment-72540267
@srowen @selvinsource From user perspective, this is the code they need to
export a model to PMML:
~~~
import org.apache.spark.mllib.export.ModelExporter
Github user MiguelPeralvo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4300#issuecomment-72543263
I've amended the commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014#issuecomment-72546189
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#discussion_r23963316
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/hiveUdfs.scala
---
@@ -321,6 +324,18 @@ private[hive] case class HiveGenericUdtf(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4315#issuecomment-72548453
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-72548543
Thanks for working on this!
I agree with @chenghao-intel, can't you just convert it to a Generate
instead of leaving it inside of a `Project` clause?
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4222#issuecomment-72548525
I've merged this into `master` (1.3.0). Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4314#issuecomment-72549392
[Test build #26546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26546/consoleFull)
for PR 4314 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3571#discussion_r23964014
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SSLOptions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4309#issuecomment-72532674
Merging into master thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72533691
[Test build #26527 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26527/consoleFull)
for PR 4299 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4258#issuecomment-72533654
[Test build #26528 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26528/consoleFull)
for PR 4258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3833#issuecomment-72533636
[Test build #26531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26531/consoleFull)
for PR 3833 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#issuecomment-72533681
[Test build #26530 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26530/consoleFull)
for PR 4067 at commit
Github user MartinWeindel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72538918
Am 02.02.2015 um 22:07 schrieb UCB AMPLab:
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 876 matches
Mail list logo
