Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5491#issuecomment-92624802
[Test build #30218 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30218/consoleFull)
for PR 5491 at commit
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5290#discussion_r28302489
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +381,33 @@ class Analyzer(catalog: Catalog,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#issuecomment-92635498
[Test build #30221 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30221/consoleFull)
for PR 5505 at commit
GitHub user WangTaoTheTonic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5506
[SPARK-6894]spark.executor.extraLibraryOptions =
spark.executor.extraLibraryPath
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6894
cc @vanzin
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#issuecomment-92653950
The trade off is in predictability and how easily users can interpret the
implications of the options they are passing. I think it could be fine
later on to add
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5491#issuecomment-92624868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#issuecomment-92664731
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5475#issuecomment-92664701
i just found that we can only allocate the accumulator for first one
`InMemoryRelation` instead of for all following `InMemoryRelation`. Because the
following relations
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92665417
[Test build #30225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30225/consoleFull)
for PR 4704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#issuecomment-92664670
[Test build #30221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30221/consoleFull)
for PR 5505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#issuecomment-92671839
[Test build #30227 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30227/consoleFull)
for PR 5505 at commit
Github user tsudukim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5447#discussion_r28302293
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1659,9 +1659,14 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
val
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92621825
Why would we get wrong properties in this case? We are explicitly setting
it in the thread that is launching the Spark job, so there is no question of
inheriting local
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#issuecomment-92631828
@andrewor14 What's the rationale to have exact cores per executor vs
allowing any cores that is between maxCoresPerExecutor and executor cores? It
seems like the cookie
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92647115
[Test build #30223 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30223/consoleFull)
for PR 5473 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92646872
Please ignore that `Processing time` and `Total delay` are `-`. It's an
issue about `JobScheduler`. I will open a JIRA for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4602#discussion_r28303497
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5506#issuecomment-92656393
[Test build #30224 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30224/consoleFull)
for PR 5506 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#issuecomment-92657307
I see, only concern for me is that if we enforce this setting in mesos
coarse
Grain mode, then all existing users with most likely see a decrease of
performance
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92660739
Please ignore that Processing time and Total delay are -. It's an issue
about JobScheduler. I will open a JIRA for it.
After thinking it carefully, this may not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92665436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4886#issuecomment-92671020
[Test build #30228 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30228/consoleFull)
for PR 4886 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r28302364
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,15 @@ case class Project(projectList:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#discussion_r28302683
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest {
)
}
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505
[SPARK-6865][SQL] DataFrame column names should be treated as string
literals
For example, a.b should match a column named `a.b`.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5417#issuecomment-92638961
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5417#issuecomment-92638878
[Test build #30219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30219/consoleFull)
for PR 5417 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4602#issuecomment-92644150
[Test build #30222 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30222/consoleFull)
for PR 4602 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92662703
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92662661
[Test build #30220 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30220/consoleFull)
for PR 5473 at commit
Github user ypcat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5042#issuecomment-92657249
@JoshRosen I updated PR description. It looks like the parquet code base I
used was too old that it did not include the
ParquetOutputFormat.ENABLE_JOB_SUMMARY thing. I
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#discussion_r28304919
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/parquetSuites.scala ---
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ class ParquetDataSourceOnSourceSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-92668018
[Test build #30226 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30226/consoleFull)
for PR 4887 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r28302328
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5298#issuecomment-92641901
Yeah, sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92646413
I set the max-width of the error column to `300px`. Here is the new
screenshot:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92658759
[Test build #30225 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30225/consoleFull)
for PR 4704 at commit
Github user jrabary commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92658574
@jkbradley yes this is still active. I just can't figure out how to push
the fix. It's my first PR here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5507
[HOTFIX] [SPARK-6896] [SQL] fix compile error in hive-thriftserver
SPARK-6440 #5424 import guava but did not promote guava dependency to
compile level.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92678279
@vanzin I agree that this PR should focus on following the previous
protocol instead of fixing issues of the protocol. Do you have other comments?
---
If your project
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5467#issuecomment-92679362
I've addressed your comments. I did not use the blas calls from linalg.blas
initially since I thought there might be some overhead due to preprocessing.
This
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92679453
[Test build #30233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30233/consoleFull)
for PR 5392 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r28307147
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92694018
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5502#issuecomment-92694087
You need a JIRA and to update the title here... see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-92696369
[Test build #30237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30237/consoleFull)
for PR 5208 at commit
Github user kno10 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3297#issuecomment-92696538
Apparently the .jar files are no longer included in the package with that
change...
This line seems to be missing:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#issuecomment-92700931
[Test build #30227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30227/consoleFull)
for PR 5505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5508#issuecomment-92705040
[Test build #30239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30239/consoleFull)
for PR 5508 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5467#issuecomment-92712446
[Test build #30232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30232/consoleFull)
for PR 5467 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5467#issuecomment-92712486
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5507#issuecomment-92717846
[Test build #30229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30229/consoleFull)
for PR 5507 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5507#issuecomment-92717875
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5507#issuecomment-92723213
Hey Daoyuan, I got same error but don't know why it acted like this.
Changing the dependency scope seems like a solution. But could you please do
some
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5506#issuecomment-92674676
Yes, good catch. LGTM. @vanzin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28305846
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ abstract class Generator extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92677740
[Test build #30230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30230/consoleFull)
for PR 5392 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92677742
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user DanielMe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1063#issuecomment-92678825
Okay, thanks for the clarification. Initially, I had naively assumed that
the functionality you added was just a layer above the Hive API hence it was a
bit confusing
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92683141
[Test build #30233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30233/consoleFull)
for PR 5392 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92683178
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5506#issuecomment-92691267
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5506#issuecomment-92691258
[Test build #30224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30224/consoleFull)
for PR 5506 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5508#issuecomment-92698359
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28310316
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -56,28 +65,33 @@ case class Generate(
val boundGenerator =
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28310315
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
Github user tsingfu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4272#issuecomment-92713227
@WangTaoTheTonic Hi, today I got the error when I did a new clean build in
updated master branch as follows:
```
cd spark
//in master branch, update my local
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92713368
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92713336
[Test build #30234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30234/consoleFull)
for PR 4704 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#discussion_r28305663
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -117,6 +117,15 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#discussion_r28306051
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -117,6 +117,15 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28306055
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -56,28 +65,33 @@ case class Generate(
val boundGenerator =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92677846
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92677841
[Test build #30231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30231/consoleFull)
for PR 4704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92682373
[Test build #30223 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30223/consoleFull)
for PR 5473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-92682417
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4272#issuecomment-92691600
@tsingfu Could you add more description about how you found the build
error? As I got same building error message when I tried to add some code in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-92693289
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-92692706
[Test build #30235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30235/consoleFull)
for PR 5208 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4886#issuecomment-92698066
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4886#issuecomment-92698047
[Test build #30228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30228/consoleFull)
for PR 4886 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5508#issuecomment-92698353
[Test build #30238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30238/consoleFull)
for PR 5508 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#issuecomment-92700970
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5507#issuecomment-92677635
[Test build #30229 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30229/consoleFull)
for PR 5507 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92677632
[Test build #30231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30231/consoleFull)
for PR 4704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92677543
[Test build #30230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30230/consoleFull)
for PR 5392 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#discussion_r28306610
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -117,6 +117,15 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5505#discussion_r28307206
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -117,6 +117,15 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#issuecomment-92696279
[Test build #30236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30236/consoleFull)
for PR 5392 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5508#issuecomment-92697977
[Test build #30238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30238/consoleFull)
for PR 5508 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4886#issuecomment-92710924
[Test build #30240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30240/consoleFull)
for PR 4886 at commit
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4272#issuecomment-92720333
@tsingfu Okay I tested it too and the error meesage is:
[INFO] compiler plugin:
BasicArtifact(org.scalamacros,paradise_2.10.4,2.0.1,null)
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28305660
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -52,14 +56,32 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28305665
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -36,6 +39,7 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4704#issuecomment-92679704
[Test build #30234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30234/consoleFull)
for PR 4704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5467#issuecomment-92679663
[Test build #30232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30232/consoleFull)
for PR 5467 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4602#issuecomment-92681545
[Test build #30222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30222/consoleFull)
for PR 4602 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4602#issuecomment-92681556
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-92693283
[Test build #30235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30235/consoleFull)
for PR 5208 at commit
Github user nishkamravi2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5085#issuecomment-92695146
Hey @andrewor14, is this a Mac/Windows issue? I can't seem to be able to
reproduce it on Linux. Also, do you happen to have the path that was returned
by
1 - 100 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
