Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#discussion_r40132036
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/pythonUDFs.scala ---
@@ -342,51 +348,57 @@ case class BatchPythonEvaluation(udf:
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#discussion_r40133609
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model = "jobj"))
#' sqlContext <- sparkRSQL.init(sc)
#'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142396754
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142397243
[Test build #42851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42851/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8775#issuecomment-142396888
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8854#issuecomment-142397298
@JoshRosen Can you also take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142401254
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8849#issuecomment-142401217
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142404458
[Test build #42855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42855/consoleFull)
for PR 8860 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142404579
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8854#discussion_r40117487
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +79,28 @@ case class SortMergeJoin(
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6457#issuecomment-142361045
LGTM; the duplicate event issue is very minor and doesn't happen with the
default config (where connections per peer is 1), so not super critical to fix
now.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8668#issuecomment-142363716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8755#discussion_r40119174
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -378,6 +378,22 @@ class Analyzer(
val
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8668#discussion_r40121163
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -147,6 +150,10 @@ class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8668#discussion_r40121097
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ class
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#issuecomment-142370370
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#issuecomment-142372122
[Test build #42845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42845/consoleFull)
for PR 8870 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#issuecomment-142379767
[Test build #42845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42845/console)
for PR 8870 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-142383435
LGTM. merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8858#discussion_r40129413
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -129,34 +129,63 @@ object SetOperationPushDown extends
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142387000
@zhichao-li I further special cased `LazySimpleSerDe`, so that we always
use `TextRecordReader`/`TextRecordWriter` together with it, and uses can
customize field
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8791#issuecomment-142390475
[Test build #42849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42849/consoleFull)
for PR 8791 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#discussion_r40131699
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/pythonUDFs.scala ---
@@ -342,51 +348,57 @@ case class BatchPythonEvaluation(udf:
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8824#issuecomment-142392010
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40125900
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -167,10 +169,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40125908
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -167,10 +169,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40125943
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -302,7 +320,44 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40125898
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -60,12 +60,14 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40125924
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -235,10 +245,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#discussion_r40127437
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model = "jobj"))
#' sqlContext <- sparkRSQL.init(sc)
#'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142383961
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142383987
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142386815
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142386846
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8858
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#discussion_r40131267
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model = "jobj"))
#' sqlContext <- sparkRSQL.init(sc)
#'
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8790#issuecomment-142392584
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8790#issuecomment-142395999
[Test build #42850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42850/consoleFull)
for PR 8790 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8824#issuecomment-142397682
Let me see if I can add a test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#discussion_r40135061
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableRDDCheckpointData.scala ---
@@ -101,7 +101,9 @@ private[spark] object ReliableRDDCheckpointData {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142403967
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40124054
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegression.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +108,12 @@ private[regression] trait
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#discussion_r40126117
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -302,7 +320,44 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8858#discussion_r40127014
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -916,4 +916,43 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8791#issuecomment-142390213
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8791#issuecomment-142390243
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142390287
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142390289
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#discussion_r40131745
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/pythonUDFs.scala ---
@@ -342,51 +348,57 @@ case class BatchPythonEvaluation(udf:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#discussion_r40133051
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/pythonUDFs.scala ---
@@ -329,7 +329,13 @@ case class EvaluatePython(
/**
* ::
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8775#issuecomment-142396548
[Test build #42844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42844/console)
for PR 8775 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142396675
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8775#issuecomment-142396883
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142401220
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8849#issuecomment-142401253
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#issuecomment-142380009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#issuecomment-142380013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142383691
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142384704
[Test build #42846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42846/consoleFull)
for PR 8860 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#discussion_r40128458
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -24,12 +24,15 @@
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142403371
[Test build #42853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42853/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8849#issuecomment-142403265
[Test build #42854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42854/consoleFull)
for PR 8849 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#discussion_r40126866
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model = "jobj"))
#' sqlContext <- sparkRSQL.init(sc)
#'
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142383516
[Test build #42842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42842/console)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-142383683
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#discussion_r40129611
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model = "jobj"))
#' sqlContext <- sparkRSQL.init(sc)
#'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8870#discussion_r40130655
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model = "jobj"))
#' sqlContext <- sparkRSQL.init(sc)
#'
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142389545
[Test build #42848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42848/consoleFull)
for PR 8860 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8858#issuecomment-142388012
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142387961
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142387993
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8854#issuecomment-142392425
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8790#issuecomment-142393514
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8790#issuecomment-142393488
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8849#issuecomment-142402703
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8849#issuecomment-142402761
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8860#issuecomment-142403510
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8811#issuecomment-142188133
[Test build #42814 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42814/console)
for PR 8811 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#discussion_r40055543
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -298,11 +298,7 @@ class LinearRegressionModel private[ml] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6790#issuecomment-142189260
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8569#issuecomment-142189285
@davies this should now work in the other places which are using cogroup
under the hood.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8862
[SQL][Minor] map -> foreach.
DataFrame.explain should use foreach to print the explain content.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#issuecomment-142193435
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#issuecomment-142193376
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8801#issuecomment-142194415
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8862#issuecomment-142194504
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8863#issuecomment-142194452
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8862#issuecomment-142194507
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8863#issuecomment-142194458
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8575
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-142195275
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#discussion_r40057454
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -264,6 +264,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#issuecomment-142198411
Merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8816#issuecomment-142199902
Oops that looked wrong. Merging this into master 1.5 thanks for catching
this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8863#issuecomment-142199703
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#discussion_r40057949
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/_shared_params_code_gen.py ---
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ def _gen_param_header(name, doc, defaultValueStr):
"""
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8811#issuecomment-142188195
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8811#issuecomment-142188194
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 712 matches
Mail list logo
