Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9208#issuecomment-150060609
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150060900
**[Test build #44105 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44105/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`1749aec`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150060626
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150060616
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150060667
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user yolandagao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9208
[SPARK-10181] [SQL] UserGroupInformation class needs to be shared for login
credentials
@yhuai
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150058761
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150058763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150058759
**[Test build #44104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44104/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`368879f`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150058485
**[Test build #44104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44104/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`368879f`](https://gith
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-150058459
/cc @rxin @aarondav
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150058402
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-150058416
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150057960
**[Test build #44103 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44103/consoleFull)**
for PR 8587 at commit
[`1505cd2`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150057965
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150057969
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
[SPARK-11171][SPARK-11237][SPARK-11241][ML][WIP] Try adding PMMLExportable
to ML with KMeans
Add PMMLExportable to ML & use it for KMeans in ML pipeline. This is a bit
different than the PMMLExport
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150057635
**[Test build #44103 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44103/consoleFull)**
for PR 8587 at commit
[`1505cd2`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-150057544
**[Test build #44102 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44102/consoleFull)**
for PR 9206 at commit
[`73a0bb8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-150056546
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150056545
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#issuecomment-150056525
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-150056518
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150056406
**[Test build #44101 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44101/consoleFull)**
for PR 8829 at commit
[`f7c620c`](https://gith
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#discussion_r42697800
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -221,4 +221,40 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends QueryTest
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206
[SPARK-11235] [network] Add ability to stream data using network lib.
The current interface used to fetch shuffle data is not very efficient for
large buffers; it requires the receiver to buffer t
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4897#issuecomment-150056080
cc @JoshRosen @sknapp who are more familiar with Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150055879
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150055853
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150055744
**[Test build #1934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1934/consoleFull)**
for PR 8829 at commit
[`f7c620c`](https://git
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#issuecomment-150055578
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11250
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150055150
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9201#issuecomment-150054928
Right, let me change that too. Thx Sean!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150054848
**[Test build #44100 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44100/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
[`cab9286`](https://gith
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#issuecomment-150054734
cool! I can help you with scala and python :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#discussion_r42696960
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1457,15 +1457,142 @@ setMethod("join",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
-#' @rdname merge
+#'
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150054474
**[Test build #44099 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44099/consoleFull)**
for PR 8729 at commit
[`353f23a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150054477
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150054478
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#discussion_r42696855
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1457,15 +1457,142 @@ setMethod("join",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
-#' @rdname merge
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150054181
**[Test build #44099 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44099/consoleFull)**
for PR 8729 at commit
[`353f23a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150053787
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150053767
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9201#discussion_r42696318
--- Diff: conf/spark-env.sh.template ---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
# - SPARK_EXECUTOR_INSTANCES, Number of workers to start (Default: 2)
# - SPARK_EXECUTOR_CO
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150053373
**[Test build #44098 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44098/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
[`1421bce`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150053054
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150053026
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150053055
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150053029
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42695679
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -618,6 +618,25 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer)
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42695693
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -95,41 +99,75 @@ public void alignToWords(i
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150051020
**[Test build #44090 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44090/consoleFull)**
for PR 8829 at commit
[`f7c620c`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150051059
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8829#issuecomment-150051060
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8840#discussion_r42694917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -128,30 +136,32 @@ private[sql] object Partitionin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150049165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150049161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-150048853
**[Test build #44093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44093/consoleFull)**
for PR 9154 at commit
[`4394f00`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150046812
**[Test build #44097 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44097/consoleFull)**
for PR 8729 at commit
[`45472f0`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150046813
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150046814
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150046454
**[Test build #44097 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44097/consoleFull)**
for PR 8729 at commit
[`45472f0`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150046031
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150045997
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150045688
**[Test build #44096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44096/consoleFull)**
for PR 9202 at commit
[`e7e401f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150044864
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150044863
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9190#issuecomment-150044716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150044743
**[Test build #44092 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44092/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
[`e33170d`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9190#issuecomment-150044715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150044370
@JoshRosen If we only scan the cached string and access it (without adding
a ConvertToUnsafe), this could be a little bit slower, because we copy the
bytes into UnsafeRow
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9190#issuecomment-150044350
**[Test build #44087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44087/consoleFull)**
for PR 9190 at commit
[`b172d78`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150043998
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150043989
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rick-ibm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150043741
Thanks, Josh. My last commit should address that long line problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42692096
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -95,41 +99,75 @@ public void alignToWords(i
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42692044
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ private void zeroOutPadding
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150043228
LGTM / merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150041856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150041884
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150041882
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150041854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150041762
**[Test build #44089 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44089/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
[`81e3fad`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9175#issuecomment-150041672
**[Test build #44088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44088/consoleFull)**
for PR 9175 at commit
[`59319e1`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8354
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8354#issuecomment-150038788
I've merged this to master. Thanks @navis!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150038460
LGTM otherwise.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42688421
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/GenerateColumnAccessor.scala
---
@@ -20,18 +20,42 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.columnar
Github user ehsanmok commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8729#issuecomment-150035571
@mengxr sorry for taking your time, but what's the issue now? everything is
updated and all dev/lint-scala tests have passed locally!
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42687468
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -95,41 +99,75 @@ public void alignToWords(int
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42687247
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ private void zeroOutPaddingBy
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-150034498
I'm really excited to see how much of a performance difference this makes
when scanning string columns, since this could potentially provide a big perf.
boost to the s
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42686848
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -618,6 +618,25 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer) {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#discussion_r42686721
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -618,6 +618,25 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204#issuecomment-150033093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204#issuecomment-150033096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204#issuecomment-150032938
**[Test build #44084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44084/consoleFull)**
for PR 9204 at commit
[`f7edb37`](https://git
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150032928
```
Scalastyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder@3/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jd
Github user rick-ibm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-150032606
The following style tests ran cleanly for me:
build/sbt scalastyle
What other style tests should I run?
Thanks,
-Rick
---
If your proje
301 - 400 of 790 matches
Mail list logo
