Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9445#issuecomment-153533742
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9394
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-153537473
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-153537472
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153539361
**[Test build #44969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44969/consoleFull)**
for PR 9450 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3816#issuecomment-153540430
**[Test build #44967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44967/consoleFull)**
for PR 3816 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153543299
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153543842
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153543543
[Test build #44987 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44987/consoleFull)
for PR 9367 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-153548710
**[Test build #44988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44988/consoleFull)**
for PR 8669 at commit
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9453
[SPARK-9858] [SQL] Add an ExchangeCoordinator to estimate the number of
post-shuffle partitions for aggregates and joins (follow-up)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9858
This PR
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9453#issuecomment-153527809
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153527858
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153528665
**[Test build #44972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44972/consoleFull)**
for PR 9383 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-153529582
How about we update the title to include the jira? Is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9372 the right one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9385#discussion_r43826123
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1019,7 +1019,16 @@ class Analyzer(
* scoping
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-153529631
Regarding the format of the title, we can do `[SPARK-x] [SQL] ...`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-153529478
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#discussion_r43826411
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -127,23 +127,30 @@ public TaskMemoryManager(MemoryManager memoryManager,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#discussion_r43826383
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -161,10 +168,10 @@ public long acquireExecutionMemory(long required,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-153532873
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-153532876
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-153532869
**[Test build #44978 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44978/consoleFull)**
for PR 9454 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#discussion_r43828243
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeFixedWidthAggregationMapSuite.scala
---
@@ -183,31 +180,30 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9439#issuecomment-153533381
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9439#issuecomment-153533385
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9394#issuecomment-153533980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153534051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153534052
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9394#issuecomment-153533901
**[Test build #44976 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44976/consoleFull)**
for PR 9394 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9394#issuecomment-153533981
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447#issuecomment-153535190
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447#issuecomment-153535095
**[Test build #44964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44964/consoleFull)**
for PR 9447 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9442#issuecomment-153535172
Thanks! LGTM. Merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447#issuecomment-153535188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9320#discussion_r43830050
--- Diff: docs/_plugins/include_example.rb ---
@@ -38,7 +38,15 @@ def render(context)
code = File.open(@file).read.encode("UTF-8")
code =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-153536466
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153536587
**[Test build #44965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44965/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9455
[SPARK-11495] Fix potential socket / file handle leaks that were found via
static analysis
The HP Fortify Opens Source Review team
(https://www.hpfod.com/open-source-review-project) reported a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153536651
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#discussion_r43830079
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/distributed.py ---
@@ -500,6 +661,25 @@ def numCols(self):
"""
return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153536652
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9455#discussion_r43830137
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -31,10 +30,8 @@
* Reads spill files
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-153536924
[Test build #44983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44983/consoleFull)
for PR 5668 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9385#issuecomment-153536898
**[Test build #44981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44981/consoleFull)**
for PR 9385 at commit
Github user dusenberrymw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#discussion_r43831148
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/distributed.py ---
@@ -297,6 +444,20 @@ def numCols(self):
"""
return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153539496
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dusenberrymw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#discussion_r43831207
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/distributed.py ---
@@ -500,6 +661,25 @@ def numCols(self):
"""
return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153539495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153540902
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#discussion_r43831883
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/distributed.py ---
@@ -500,6 +661,25 @@ def numCols(self):
"""
return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153540890
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user a1singh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9456
Update LDAOptimizer.scala
In file LDAOptimizer.scala:
line 441: since "idx" was never used, replaced unrequired
zipWithIndex.foreach with foreach.
-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9456#issuecomment-153541597
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153543287
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5855#discussion_r43822024
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/SlidingRDD.scala
---
@@ -66,36 +69,54 @@ class SlidingRDD[T: ClassTag](@transient val parent:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9364#discussion_r43823876
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -997,4 +1001,116 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8643#discussion_r43823836
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/LDAModelWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153527227
**[Test build #44959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44959/consoleFull)**
for PR 9383 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9452#issuecomment-153529071
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9452#issuecomment-153529161
**[Test build #1974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1974/consoleFull)**
for PR 9452 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#discussion_r43826213
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/MemoryConsumer.java ---
@@ -74,26 +78,26 @@ public void spill() throws IOException {
public abstract
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-153529807
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451#issuecomment-153529828
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9394#issuecomment-153534639
@felixcheung @shivaram Thank you so much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153535525
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#discussion_r43829408
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingLinearAlgorithm.scala
---
@@ -91,7 +112,22 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153535482
**[Test build #44977 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44977/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153535524
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9385#issuecomment-153536164
I think there is some issue in Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9385#issuecomment-153536227
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#discussion_r43829680
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/distributed.py ---
@@ -500,6 +661,25 @@ def numCols(self):
"""
return
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153538637
**[Test build #44985 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44985/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9455#issuecomment-153538651
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9455#issuecomment-153538647
**[Test build #44984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44984/consoleFull)**
for PR 9455 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9455#issuecomment-153538652
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9429#issuecomment-153540121
After checking with Hive like:
```
hive> select sum(a-b) as ab from mytable group by b with rollup;
FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10210]: Grouping
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153541323
**[Test build #44986 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44986/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8374#discussion_r43833399
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JdbcDialects.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ abstract class JdbcDialect {
def getJDBCType(dt:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153544392
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153544394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9419#issuecomment-153546000
is this PR fix the sample problem with
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9429?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9428#issuecomment-153546887
/cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9419#issuecomment-153547807
Yes, true, but in different approach.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9452#issuecomment-153547863
**[Test build #1974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1974/consoleFull)**
for PR 9452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-153547820
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-153547836
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user choochootrain commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153550645
whoops, fixed the style error.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r43836051
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitSuite.scala ---
@@ -366,6 +367,72 @@ class SparkSubmitSuite
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153550807
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kmader commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9417#issuecomment-153550148
@srowen @hvanhovell this is a nice improvement and more elegant than the
original approach.
As a side node, In our code base (which uses PortableDataStream
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-153550955
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9457#issuecomment-153550959
**[Test build #44990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44990/consoleFull)**
for PR 9457 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-153551172
[Test build #44991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44991/consoleFull)
for PR 9367 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9349#issuecomment-153553626
@davies Thanks for the advice. The commit has been updated, please check if
that's what we want.
Btw, I think the cause of this problem is the inconsistency
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9458#issuecomment-153554779
**[Test build #44992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44992/consoleFull)**
for PR 9458 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8728#issuecomment-153556500
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43838362
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -37,3 +35,39 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9320#issuecomment-153559587
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
601 - 700 of 973 matches
Mail list logo
