Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-162783007
I can send out another PR if other people think that variant is needed.
This PR has been closed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162782886
**[Test build #47312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47312/consoleFull)**
for PR 10189 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162782894
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#discussion_r46917559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDatasetSuite.java ---
@@ -386,6 +389,20 @@ public void testNestedTupleEncoder() {
}
GitHub user RotemShaul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10190
[SPARK-12197] [SparkCore] Kryo & Avro - Support Schema Repo
Adding ability for efficient and dynamic generic records serialization
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user ygcao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r46923499
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -534,8 +588,13 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
// Need
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10102#issuecomment-162797184
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10102#issuecomment-162797185
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10102#issuecomment-162797178
**[Test build #47316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47316/consoleFull)**
for PR 10102 at commit
Github user ygcao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r46921737
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -469,7 +469,32 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162791608
**[Test build #47314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47314/consoleFull)**
for PR 10189 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10086#issuecomment-162801479
**[Test build #47318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47318/consoleFull)**
for PR 10086 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10098
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8534#issuecomment-162803003
Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10190#issuecomment-162802941
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10145#issuecomment-162793797
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10145#issuecomment-162793798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10145#issuecomment-162793714
**[Test build #47313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47313/consoleFull)**
for PR 10145 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162796584
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162796525
**[Test build #47314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47314/consoleFull)**
for PR 10189 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10102#issuecomment-162796594
**[Test build #47316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47316/consoleFull)**
for PR 10102 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#discussion_r46920864
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162796583
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002#issuecomment-162799563
@mengxr Yes, I'll submit a follow-up pr to refine it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-162799727
**[Test build #47317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47317/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162799660
**[Test build #47310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47310/consoleFull)**
for PR 10188 at commit
GitHub user yucai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10192
[SPARK-12196][Core]Store blocks in storage devices with hierarchy way
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12196
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#discussion_r46919957
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162797991
@mengxr @selvinsource As we talked there, I don't think PMML has good
supports for multinomial naive bayes because we cannot fit the model of
multinomial naive bayes
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10086#issuecomment-162799550
@dragos just updated the docs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-162800260
@jkbradley as far as I can see:
The input to `fit` is `dataset: RDD[Iterable[String]]`. However, in
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8534
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10191
[SPARK-12198] [SparkR] SparkR support read.parquet and deprecate parquetFile
SparkR support read.parquet and deprecate parquetFile.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-162781596
There are two drop variants for single column:
```
def drop(colName: String)
def drop(col: Column)
```
But there is only one drop accepting multiple
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10145#issuecomment-162787774
**[Test build #47313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47313/consoleFull)**
for PR 10145 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162787574
@sun-rui Got it, thanks for your kindly remind.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#discussion_r46918098
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162780584
**[Test build #47311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47311/consoleFull)**
for PR 10188 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162780940
@yanboliang, thanks for the PR. But for SparkR RDD API, still discussion
how to evolve it. So maybe we need more discussion before submitting a PR for
all RDD related
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189
[SPARK-12170] [SparkR] Deprecate the JAVA-specific deserialized storage
levels
Deprecate the JAVA-specific deserialized storage levels.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10166#issuecomment-162795582
@jkbradley Thanks for reviewing, will take those comments into account.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002#discussion_r46921864
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -794,39 +411,7 @@ dctDf.select("featuresDCT").show(3)
Refer to the [DCT Java
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-162802294
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ygcao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r46922797
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -281,16 +280,17 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10057#discussion_r46922802
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcher.scala
---
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ private[mesos] class MesosClusterDispatcher(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-162802293
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-162802287
**[Test build #47317 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47317/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-162804040
Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162790306
yes, in fact we are instructed not to work on Spark 2.0 release yet
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162795966
**[Test build #47315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47315/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162799792
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002#issuecomment-162799717
Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162799790
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10183#issuecomment-162801697
LGTM. Merged into branch-1.5. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162801792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162801753
**[Test build #47315 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47315/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162801790
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-162781291
**[Test build #47303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47303/consoleFull)**
for PR 10094 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-162781378
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-162781379
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162782245
**[Test build #47312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47312/consoleFull)**
for PR 10189 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10189#issuecomment-162782896
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162802436
**[Test build #47311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47311/consoleFull)**
for PR 10188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162802522
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162537898
**[Test build #47267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47267/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-162540970
**[Test build #47268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47268/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#issuecomment-162562042
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-162526464
Pinging @mengxr @MechCoder @jkbradley (and I think @Ishiihara was the
original author of Word2Vec?)
So let's focus this PR in on making the max sentence size
GitHub user stephankessler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174
[SPARK-7727] [SQL] Avoid inner classes in RuleExecutor
Moved (case) classes Strategy, Once, FixedPoint and Batch to the companion
object. This is necessary if we want to have the Optimizer
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8513#issuecomment-162527770
Feel free to do whatever.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107#discussion_r46826348
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/AllStagesResourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162552952
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162552814
**[Test build #47269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47269/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162552947
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162534062
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107#discussion_r46826421
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/AllStagesResourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162543995
**[Test build #47269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47269/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162571320
**[Test build #47267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47267/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-162584115
**[Test build #47268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47268/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162602716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162602714
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#discussion_r46852150
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsPage.scala
---
@@ -128,11 +152,36 @@ private[ui] class ExecutorsPage(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162602535
**[Test build #47270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47270/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#discussion_r46852090
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsPage.scala
---
@@ -117,6 +119,28 @@ private[ui] class ExecutorsPage(
val
Github user tribbloid commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#issuecomment-162604858
@srowen yeah, I'll reply shortly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162571699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162571693
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-162580841
**[Test build #47271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47271/consoleFull)**
for PR 6935 at commit
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10166#issuecomment-162566145
Hey @holdenk, thanks for reviewing.
Do you mean regarding StringIndexer#setHandleInvalid method? If so, yes
that'd be a good addition.
However, I'm
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-162584734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10146#issuecomment-162569175
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162569257
weird. these tests are passed on my server.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-162566075
**[Test build #47270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47270/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-162591780
@marmbrus
What do you think ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#discussion_r46852254
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsPage.scala
---
@@ -128,11 +152,36 @@ private[ui] class ExecutorsPage(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162446652
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162446599
**[Test build #47259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47259/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9988#issuecomment-162450972
**[Test build #47262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47262/consoleFull)**
for PR 9988 at commit
1 - 100 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
