Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#discussion_r48912881
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -223,14 +227,9 @@ public void loadNext() {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10607#issuecomment-169171784
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169172279
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#discussion_r48913054
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -94,16 +94,18 @@ class
LogisticRegressionModel(LinearClassificationModel):
Github user vectorijk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#issuecomment-169172817
cc @cloud-fan @marmbrus @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#issuecomment-168982479
**[Test build #48763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48763/consoleFull)**
for PR 10541 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-168982645
**[Test build #48765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48765/consoleFull)**
for PR 10498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-168984129
**[Test build #48766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48766/consoleFull)**
for PR 10583 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-168985619
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-168985593
**[Test build #48762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48762/consoleFull)**
for PR 10570 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-168985620
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#issuecomment-168986043
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vijaykiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48839934
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -130,15 +133,22 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.1,
maxPatternLength=10, maxLocalProjDBSize=320
Github user vijaykiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48839858
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -68,11 +68,14 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.3, numPartitions=-1):
"""
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-168988730
**[Test build #48768 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48768/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
GitHub user somideshmukh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602
[SPARK-12632][Python][Make Parameter Descriptions Consistent for PySpark
MLlib FPM and Recommendation]
Made changes in FPM file ,Recommendation file doesnot contain param changes
You can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-168988728
**[Test build #48769 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48769/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10545#issuecomment-168990626
**[Test build #48767 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48767/consoleFull)**
for PR 10545 at commit
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10603
[STREAMING][DOCS][EXAMPLES] Minor fixes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaceklaskowski/spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-168991865
**[Test build #48769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48769/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-168991988
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-169192724
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10523#issuecomment-169193276
@yhuai Yes, quoted tables in postgres are always case-sensitive. We need to
support case-insensitive table names? Table names in sparksql
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#issuecomment-169193588
I see. Adding this seems reasonable since some spark.ml algorithms depend
on these APIs. However, I want to avoid breaking the public optimization APIs
in
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#discussion_r48920477
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ class GradientDescent private[spark]
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#discussion_r48920506
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ object GradientDescent extends Logging {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#discussion_r48920464
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ class GradientDescent private[spark]
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10593#discussion_r48920875
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169196055
cc @cloud-fan can you take a look at this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169196126
**[Test build #48808 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48808/consoleFull)**
for PR 10609 at commit
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169196705
Thanks @jkbradley might have missed it or thought it was under
discussion.updated.thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10589#discussion_r48921242
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48921238
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -587,6 +586,13 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169197671
**[Test build #48799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48799/consoleFull)**
for PR 10578 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169198124
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169198126
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10376#issuecomment-169198730
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48921611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/bucket.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10376#issuecomment-169200095
**[Test build #48809 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48809/consoleFull)**
for PR 10376 at commit
801 - 841 of 841 matches
Mail list logo
