Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170457917
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170454473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170457916
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170457858
[Test build #49106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49106/console)
for PR 10690 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170454414
**[Test build #49105 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49105/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170456618
**[Test build #49104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49104/consoleFull)**
for PR 10693 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170456634
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170454472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170456629
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170431156
**[Test build #49090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49090/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434435
**[Test build #49091 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49091/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#discussion_r49290681
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQlSuite.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +49,11 @@ class CatalystQlSuite extends PlanTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434505
**[Test build #49091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49091/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434508
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434507
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#discussion_r49290887
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -25,17 +25,26 @@ import
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#issuecomment-170436089
After talk with @mwws offline, we probably need to serialize the
`accumulator` variables as well.
I personally agree with @srowen, we need to think
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170436168
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170436166
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170436106
**[Test build #49087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49087/consoleFull)**
for PR 10480 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436196
**[Test build #49093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49093/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436782
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436774
**[Test build #49093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49093/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436786
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170438966
**[Test build #49092 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49092/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170439459
This is NOT ready to merge; it looks like these exclusions have somehow
catastrophically broken tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170439442
This is NOT ready to merge; it looks like these exclusions have somehow
catastrophically broken tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170413848
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170413849
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#discussion_r49285986
--- Diff: project/MimaBuild.scala ---
@@ -91,11 +91,16 @@ object MimaBuild {
def mimaSettings(sparkHome: File, projectRef: ProjectRef) = {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170416396
**[Test build #49082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49082/consoleFull)**
for PR 10480 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170418713
**[Test build #49083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49083/consoleFull)**
for PR 10688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170419332
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170419723
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170422188
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170422189
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170422175
**[Test build #49085 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49085/consoleFull)**
for PR 10685 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170422086
@hvanhovell @rxin Could you take a look? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9276#discussion_r49287822
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170424371
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170424304
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170425066
**[Test build #49086 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49086/consoleFull)**
for PR 10687 at commit
Github user JoshRosen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#discussion_r49288754
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQlSuite.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +49,11 @@ class CatalystQlSuite extends PlanTest {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170427560
**[Test build #49083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49083/consoleFull)**
for PR 10688 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49289367
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +126,24 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428263
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428264
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428259
**[Test build #49088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49088/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428142
**[Test build #49088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49088/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690
[SPARK-12734][BUILD] Backport Netty exclusion + Maven enforcer fixes to
branch-1.5
This patch backports the Netty exclusion fixes from #10672 to branch-1.5.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170428472
**[Test build #49084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49084/consoleFull)**
for PR 10688 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170429827
[Test build #49089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49089/consoleFull)
for PR 10690 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#discussion_r49286033
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2272,3 +2260,40 @@ setMethod("with",
newEnv <- assignNewEnv(data)
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#discussion_r49286036
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2272,3 +2260,40 @@ setMethod("with",
newEnv <- assignNewEnv(data)
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170415749
rebased and updated. thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#discussion_r49286045
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -556,3 +556,61 @@ createExternalTable <- function(sqlContext, tableName,
path = NULL, source = NUL
sdf <-
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170418270
```
spark-mllib: found 0 potential binary incompatibilities (filtered 10)
sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170418047
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170418048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170418031
**[Test build #49082 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49082/consoleFull)**
for PR 10480 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170419331
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170419302
**[Test build #49074 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49074/consoleFull)**
for PR 10685 at commit
Github user yucai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170419313
Sorry, I miss the conversation! I will update it right now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170420565
**[Test build #49084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49084/consoleFull)**
for PR 10688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-170421549
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-170421478
**[Test build #49078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49078/consoleFull)**
for PR 10585 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-170421550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170421465
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170421463
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#discussion_r49288092
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1465,4 +1465,15 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#discussion_r49288079
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1465,4 +1465,15 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170424902
@antlypls Thank you for the PR! Overall it looks good. Just left two
comments about the test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170426165
Test failure is unrelated (it failed almost at the very end of the build
with a timeout), so I'm going to merge this now in order to unblock another
backport.
---
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49288690
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170426398
Thanks for reviewing. I'm going to merge this into master and will open
separate PRs to test the backports, which might possibly require a different
set of exclusion
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170426453
**[Test build #49086 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49086/consoleFull)**
for PR 10687 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170426462
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170426463
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612#issuecomment-170426738
I've merged this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170427636
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170427637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170428534
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170428533
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691
[SPARK-12734][BUILD] Backport Netty exclusion + Maven enforcer fixes to
branch-1.6
This patch backports the Netty exclusion fixes from #10672 to branch-1.6.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49289994
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +126,24 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170416098
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170416071
**[Test build #49076 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49076/console)**
for PR 10679 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170416096
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9276#discussion_r49286654
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170421364
**[Test build #49085 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49085/consoleFull)**
for PR 10685 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170421391
**[Test build #49080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49080/consoleFull)**
for PR 10689 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170421900
@davies Could you take a look if the fix covers the analysis resolution
issue in TPCD? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user Wenpei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10587#issuecomment-170423933
Thank you @srowen, I refine parameter explanation base on your suggestion.
Pls take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170425634
**[Test build #49087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49087/consoleFull)**
for PR 10480 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612#issuecomment-170426571
**[Test build #49081 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49081/consoleFull)**
for PR 10612 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612#issuecomment-170426634
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612#issuecomment-170426632
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
