Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#discussion_r49406988
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2093,6 +2093,95 @@ class RFormulaModel(JavaModel):
"""
+@inherit_doc
+class
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#discussion_r49406980
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2093,6 +2093,95 @@ class RFormulaModel(JavaModel):
"""
+@inherit_doc
+class
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#discussion_r49406991
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2093,6 +2093,95 @@ class RFormulaModel(JavaModel):
"""
+@inherit_doc
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170703104
**[Test build #49172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49172/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170703109
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10709#issuecomment-170708917
**[Test build #49175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49175/consoleFull)**
for PR 10709 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170709106
**[Test build #49178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49178/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170709115
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170710545
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170710543
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552#issuecomment-170715008
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks for the PR!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#discussion_r49391345
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -38,13 +38,120 @@
from pyspark.mllib.util import Saveable, Loader, inherit_doc, JavaLoader,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170722730
**[Test build #49170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49170/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170723789
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170738009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#discussion_r49398766
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170738011
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170744337
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dusenberrymw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#issuecomment-170744335
@jkbradley Now that #9458 has been merged, this is ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170744338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170744399
**[Test build #49196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49196/consoleFull)**
for PR 10604 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#discussion_r49403219
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -206,22 +230,230 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170747173
**[Test build #49187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49187/consoleFull)**
for PR 10703 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170747333
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170747335
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10714#issuecomment-170750310
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170754853
@zsxwing Could you also update the patch for callback server to use new
API? see https://github.com/bartdag/py4j/issues/147
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170711143
**[Test build #49167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49167/consoleFull)**
for PR 10705 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10085#issuecomment-170710926
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170724485
**[Test build #49187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49187/consoleFull)**
for PR 10703 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-170727983
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#discussion_r49395627
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/GLMFamilies.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10711#issuecomment-170737484
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170741917
**[Test build #49184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49184/consoleFull)**
for PR 10649 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#issuecomment-170744030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#issuecomment-170743821
**[Test build #49192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49192/consoleFull)**
for PR 9441 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#issuecomment-170744026
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170746058
**[Test build #49195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49195/consoleFull)**
for PR 10628 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170746066
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170746070
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#discussion_r49406251
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -206,22 +230,230 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children:
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10709
[SPARK-9383][PROJECT-INFRA] PR merge script should reset back to previous
branch when possible
This patch modifies our PR merge script to reset back to a named branch
when restoring the
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10709#issuecomment-170703734
/cc @srowen @ijuma, I finally got around to this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10085#issuecomment-170706592
**[Test build #49177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49177/consoleFull)**
for PR 10085 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170706410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170706402
**[Test build #49179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49179/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170706406
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170709769
@cloud-fan can you also take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170711333
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-170711337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170712550
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170712548
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704#issuecomment-170713355
**[Test build #49166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49166/consoleFull)**
for PR 10704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-170713648
**[Test build #49165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49165/consoleFull)**
for PR 10703 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170713469
**[Test build #49185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49185/consoleFull)**
for PR 10604 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170723792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10274#discussion_r49400106
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquaresSuite.scala
---
@@ -74,6 +89,35 @@ class WeightedLeastSquaresSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9441#issuecomment-170741144
**[Test build #49192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49192/consoleFull)**
for PR 9441 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#discussion_r49400552
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/IterativelyReweightedLeastSquares.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10713#issuecomment-170741952
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170742130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-170742069
**[Test build #49193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49193/consoleFull)**
for PR 10604 at commit
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10668#issuecomment-170742801
Here's a screenshot of @tgravescs summary table idea. [Note: this code is
NOT committed] What do people think of this alternative? Opinions on how to
improve it? I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170745264
**[Test build #49195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49195/consoleFull)**
for PR 10628 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#discussion_r49402268
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -683,9 +685,28 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation private[sql](
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10714
[SPARK-9844][CORE] File appender race condition during shutdown
When an Executor process is destroyed, the FileAppender that is
asynchronously reading the stderr stream of the process can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10708#issuecomment-170700955
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170703468
**[Test build #49174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49174/consoleFull)**
for PR 10150 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170705376
**[Test build #49174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49174/consoleFull)**
for PR 10150 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170705382
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10710#issuecomment-170705375
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170705386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#issuecomment-170707177
**[Test build #49181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10150 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170730359
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170730361
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170730217
**[Test build #49173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49173/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r4946
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49400036
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+package
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#discussion_r49399720
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+package
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10712#issuecomment-170739243
**[Test build #49189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49189/consoleFull)**
for PR 10712 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#discussion_r49402388
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9548#issuecomment-170755883
@gatorsmile we will revisit this in the future. Do you mind closing the
pull request for now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170755933
@gatorsmile I think we'd need more proper design for limits. Let's close
this as later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user antlypls commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10687#issuecomment-170460587
@yhuai I've updated test according to your comments, not sure why build
failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9484#issuecomment-170460427
Sorry for the late response. Update sent
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9484#issuecomment-170460988
**[Test build #49109 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49109/consoleFull)**
for PR 9484 at commit
Github user yucai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170462047
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9484#issuecomment-170483110
Getting many TimeoutException.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10256
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9484#issuecomment-170489132
**[Test build #49124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49124/consoleFull)**
for PR 9484 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10627#issuecomment-170491266
**[Test build #49130 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49130/consoleFull)**
for PR 10627 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10695
[SPARK-12747][SQL] Use correct type name for Postgres JDBC's real array
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12747
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170509970
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-170460037
**[Test build #49107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49107/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
101 - 200 of 749 matches
Mail list logo
