Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175971832
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175971830
**[Test build #50249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50249/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
[`75cb0f6`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-175971750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175971770
**[Test build #50244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50244/consoleFull)**
for PR 10958 at commit
[`6e4859d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-175971754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-175971589
**[Test build #50246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50246/consoleFull)**
for PR 10963 at commit
[`468abca`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175970101
**[Test build #50249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50249/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
[`75cb0f6`](https://gith
Github user zhuoliu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10648#issuecomment-175966503
Hi @tgravescs , finally fixed the paging stuff in RowsGrouping. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51077616
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51077516
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175955464
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175955469
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175955462
**[Test build #50247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50247/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
[`ab6d601`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-175955168
**[Test build #50247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50247/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
[`ab6d601`](https://gith
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#discussion_r51076979
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -152,13 +152,17 @@ def isDefined(self, param):
return self.isSet(param) or self.hasDefault(pa
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-175946838
cc @davies. Thanks @sunrui for the PR. I'll review this later today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#discussion_r51075753
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -152,13 +152,17 @@ def isDefined(self, param):
return self.isSet(param) or self.hasDefaul
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-175939401
**[Test build #50246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50246/consoleFull)**
for PR 10963 at commit
[`468abca`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#discussion_r51074963
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlLexer.g
---
@@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ Identifier
fragment
QuotedI
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#discussion_r51074937
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlLexer.g
---
@@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ Identifier
fragment
QuotedI
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963
[SPARK-12989] [SQL] Delaying Alias Cleanup after ExtractWindowExpressions
In the rule `ExtractWindowExpressions`, we simply replace alias by the
name. However, this will cause an issue exposed b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#issuecomment-175932477
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#issuecomment-175932469
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10930#issuecomment-175932166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10930#issuecomment-175932171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10930#issuecomment-175931946
**[Test build #50233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50233/consoleFull)**
for PR 10930 at commit
[`e627f5b`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#discussion_r51074011
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -388,57 +445,18 @@ class Analyzer(
.m
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175930915
**[Test build #50244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50244/consoleFull)**
for PR 10958 at commit
[`6e4859d`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10916#discussion_r51073555
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientInterface.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ private[hive] trait ClientInterface {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10916#discussion_r51073506
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Catalog.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ trait Catalog {
def lookupRela
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9940#issuecomment-175927505
ping @liancheng Please see if latest updates are proper for you. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10916#discussion_r51073364
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/CliSuite.scala
---
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ class CliSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-175927249
Github is hiccuping ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#issuecomment-175927638
**[Test build #50243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50243/consoleFull)**
for PR 10527 at commit
[`9476822`](https://gi
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10918#issuecomment-175927636
@ankurdave @srowen ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175926617
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vectorijk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#issuecomment-175924450
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-175921366
I think this makes sense since it is harmonizing the behaviour with the
Scala API. Perhaps adding a note in the PyDoc about the new behaviour as well
as a test might be
Github user iyounus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51071809
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Sinc
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-175920740
**[Test build #50242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50242/consoleFull)**
for PR 10962 at commit
[`d52b1de`](https://gi
Github user iyounus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51071489
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Sinc
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962
[SPARK-13047][PYSPARK][ML] Pyspark Params.hasParam should not throw an error
Pyspark Params class has a method `hasParam(paramName)` which returns
`True` if the class has a parameter by that name, b
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-175917517
@cloud-fan Thank you Wenchen.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10961#issuecomment-175917592
**[Test build #50241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50241/consoleFull)**
for PR 10961 at commit
[`24ca13c`](https://gi
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51070506
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user Neuw84 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8909#issuecomment-175916186
@deenar, I saw it after many hours reading the code in the web docs .
Although, I think that the HiveSparkContext should implement the same logic as
the SparkContext whe
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51070301
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960#issuecomment-175915582
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960#issuecomment-175915586
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51070105
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51070090
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51069962
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -219,33 +219,43 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960#issuecomment-175914531
**[Test build #50240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50240/consoleFull)**
for PR 10960 at commit
[`61edd5e`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10957#issuecomment-175913747
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10957#issuecomment-175913754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user nongli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10961
[SPARK-13043][SQL] Implement remaining catalyst types in ColumnarBatch.
This includes: float, boolean, short, decimal and calendar interval.
Decimal is mapped to long or byte array depending
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10957#issuecomment-175913287
**[Test build #50231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50231/consoleFull)**
for PR 10957 at commit
[`defcc02`](https://g
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960#issuecomment-175911728
cc @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10940#issuecomment-175911585
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51068802
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -17,16 +17,31 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10940#issuecomment-175911586
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10952
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51068566
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -146,6 +172,26 @@ case class Union(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10940#issuecomment-175911254
**[Test build #50227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50227/consoleFull)**
for PR 10940 at commit
[`914cffc`](https://g
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10952#issuecomment-175911147
Merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960
[SPARK-12963] Improve performance of stddev/variance
As benchmarked and discussed here:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10786/files#r50038294, benefits from
codegen, the declarative aggregate
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51068499
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ case class Generate(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51068376
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -17,16 +17,31 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.c
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10952#issuecomment-175909805
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10952#issuecomment-175909089
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175908753
**[Test build #50238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50238/consoleFull)**
for PR 10958 at commit
[`6e4859d`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175908426
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175908428
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10957#issuecomment-175908190
A user is trying to get this working on 1.6 using the dataframe api. That
doesn't work directly because functions.scala misses the functions implemented
in this PR.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175907876
**[Test build #50235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50235/consoleFull)**
for PR 10958 at commit
[`822899d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175907935
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175907933
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-175907259
**[Test build #50236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50236/consoleFull)**
for PR 10608 at commit
[`18c5223`](https://g
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10849#issuecomment-175907368
Please update the title and description (these become the commit message
when merging).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-175907305
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-175907303
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-175906396
`select` is the API that supposed to take `column path`, but something like
`withColumn`, `drop`, etc. is supposed to take `column name`. So what I suggest
is: change
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-175904859
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10957#issuecomment-175904468
Why might this be a bug fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175904183
**[Test build #50235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50235/consoleFull)**
for PR 10958 at commit
[`822899d`](https://gi
GitHub user RaafatAkkad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959
SPARK-13052 waitingApps metric doesn't show the number of apps currently in
the WAITING state
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10955#issuecomment-175903354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10955#issuecomment-175903359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-175903316
**[Test build #50236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50236/consoleFull)**
for PR 10608 at commit
[`18c5223`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10955#issuecomment-175903131
**[Test build #50223 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50223/consoleFull)**
for PR 10955 at commit
[`5b449cc`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175903012
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175902964
**[Test build #50234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50234/consoleFull)**
for PR 10958 at commit
[`5404254`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175903014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51064724
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -558,6 +575,47 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite
}
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#discussion_r51064615
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -558,6 +575,47 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite
}
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-175901752
@iyounus `standardizeLabel = false/ture` with non-zero `regParam`, let's
throw the exception. I explained the mismatch against the analytic normal
equation in the other
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-175901624
@srowen, yep, this is pretty much just the result of running the version
changing and dep update scripts, followed by a grep through the documentation
and build to in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175901408
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-175901457
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#issuecomment-175901412
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
101 - 200 of 600 matches
Mail list logo
