Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178350183
**[Test build #50525 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50525/consoleFull)**
for PR 10943 at commit
[`dfaa13b`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11015#issuecomment-178349454
**[Test build #50531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50531/consoleFull)**
for PR 11015 at commit
[`be5586b`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10942#discussion_r51519464
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -59,6 +61,159 @@ class BucketedReadSuite extends QueryTest w
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10942#discussion_r51519475
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -59,6 +61,159 @@ class BucketedReadSuite extends QueryTest w
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-178348003
Thank you everyone! : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178346293
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178346294
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178345954
**[Test build #50520 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50520/consoleFull)**
for PR 11012 at commit
[`6e0156c`](https://g
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9288#issuecomment-178345844
Let me take a crack at this issue :).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11015
[SPARK-13089] [Doc] spark.ml Naive Bayes user guide and examples
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13089
Add section in ml-classification.md for NaiveBayes DataFrame-based AP
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11013#issuecomment-178342555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11013#issuecomment-178342548
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8195#issuecomment-178342313
I doubt this will be merged at this stage given lack of graphx activity.
Instead I think this should be closed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11013#issuecomment-178341540
**[Test build #50521 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50521/consoleFull)**
for PR 11013 at commit
[`e16fabf`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11002#issuecomment-178337808
Seems OK, are there other redundant usages? The constant name including 13
seems overly specific too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178335843
**[Test build #50529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50529/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
[`735e113`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-178334612
**[Test build #50517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50517/consoleFull)**
for PR 10904 at commit
[`200a5df`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-178334958
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178336884
Test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178335886
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-178334964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178333626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178333524
**[Test build #50519 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50519/consoleFull)**
for PR 11011 at commit
[`e605a09`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178333628
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178335884
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178329536
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178329510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178329534
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178329512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178329506
**[Test build #50527 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50527/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
[`735e113`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11014#issuecomment-178329483
**[Test build #50528 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50528/consoleFull)**
for PR 11014 at commit
[`ae356d1`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-178328745
@navis you can close this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178328771
**[Test build #50518 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50518/consoleFull)**
for PR 10844 at commit
[`b52742a`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#discussion_r51516100
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,17 @@ class StatsReportListener extends SparkListener with
Lo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11001#issuecomment-178327848
**[Test build #50530 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50530/consoleFull)**
for PR 11001 at commit
[`fbed906`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178327196
**[Test build #50529 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50529/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
[`735e113`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178323245
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178322983
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178322981
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178321052
**[Test build #50527 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50527/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
[`735e113`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11009#issuecomment-178320218
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11009#issuecomment-178320220
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11009#issuecomment-178319870
**[Test build #50515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50515/consoleFull)**
for PR 11009 at commit
[`ff187c3`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178319137
**[Test build #50525 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50525/consoleFull)**
for PR 10943 at commit
[`dfaa13b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-178318013
**[Test build #50524 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50524/consoleFull)**
for PR 10794 at commit
[`30048ac`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51514134
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178314893
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user budde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178314141
Pinging @andrewor14 , the original implementor of unrollSafely(), for any
potential feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51513704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataStreamWriter.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user Astralidea commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10768#issuecomment-178313347
@dragos Sorry about busy these days, In your comment, The feature is great.
Because if I change the configuration I did not redeploy mesos-dispacher, but
In my Syste
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178310099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178310098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178310067
**[Test build #50522 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50522/consoleFull)**
for PR 10943 at commit
[`dfaa13b`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-178309811
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11014#issuecomment-178309731
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11014#issuecomment-178309734
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11014#issuecomment-178309726
**[Test build #50523 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50523/consoleFull)**
for PR 11014 at commit
[`1c2f67d`](https://g
Github user Astralidea commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10770#issuecomment-178309526
@andrewor14 I tried but it does not work. Because I Need run with root on
mesos. and read Hive use another USER. with this I must set HADOOP_USER_NAME,
if i didn't r
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11014#issuecomment-178309506
**[Test build #50523 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50523/consoleFull)**
for PR 11014 at commit
[`1c2f67d`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51511655
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamProgress.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-178302904
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-178302908
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-178302380
**[Test build #50510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50510/consoleFull)**
for PR 10959 at commit
[`9549c83`](https://g
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11014
[SPARK-13094][SQL] Add encoders for seq/array of primitives
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark seqEncoders
Altern
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178300442
**[Test build #50522 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50522/consoleFull)**
for PR 10943 at commit
[`dfaa13b`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10951#issuecomment-178300028
@tgravescs Don't we need to make the events posted in the right order,
otherwise we'll still run into SPARK-11334? I agree with the high level idea in
this patch, bu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11013#issuecomment-178299984
**[Test build #50521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50521/consoleFull)**
for PR 11013 at commit
[`e16fabf`](https://gi
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-178299378
@cloud-fan Thanks a lot. I have implemented as per your input.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178299115
**[Test build #50520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50520/consoleFull)**
for PR 11012 at commit
[`6e0156c`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10951#discussion_r51510297
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -982,6 +988,52 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite wi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10951#discussion_r51510185
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1153,7 +1153,16 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
if (!
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-178297491
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-178297483
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10958#discussion_r51510044
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1144,13 +1144,12 @@ class DAGScheduler(
null
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-178297063
**[Test build #50512 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50512/consoleFull)**
for PR 10702 at commit
[`2480dc1`](https://g
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178295713
Opened #11013 for master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11013
[SPARK-13087][SQL] Fix group by function for sort based aggregation
It is not valid to call `toAttribute` on a `NamedExpression` unless we know
for sure that the child produced that `NamedExpressi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178295383
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178295577
**[Test build #50518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50518/consoleFull)**
for PR 10844 at commit
[`b52742a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178295397
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178294869
**[Test build #50519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50519/consoleFull)**
for PR 11011 at commit
[`e605a09`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178294673
**[Test build #50509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50509/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
[`5220ea8`](https://g
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11009#discussion_r51509060
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1257,7 +1257,8 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
def drop(colNames: Stri
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11009#discussion_r51509057
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1257,7 +1257,8 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
def drop(colNames: Stri
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11010
[SPARK-12950] [SQL] Improve lookup of BytesToBytesMap in aggregate
This PR improve the lookup of BytesToBytesMap by:
1. Generate code for calculate the hash code of grouping keys.
GitHub user budde opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012
[SPARK-13122] Fix race condition in MemoryStore.unrollSafely()
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13122
A race condition can occur in MemoryStore's unrollSafely() method if two
thre
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11009#issuecomment-178281031
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-178283366
Yes, this is the yarn-client only AM reattempt issue, I address this issue
before by resetting the status of `ExecutorAllocationManager` and
`CoarseGrainedSchedulerBa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-178281427
**[Test build #50512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50512/consoleFull)**
for PR 10702 at commit
[`2480dc1`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178292411
/cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51506712
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataStreamWriter.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178280862
@marmbrus comments addressed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011#issuecomment-178292463
I'm investigating if this is a problem in master and will open another PR
if needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11011
[SPARK-13087][SQL] Fix group by function for sort based aggregation
It is not valid to call `toAttribute` on a `NamedExpression` unless we know
for sure that the child produced that `NamedExpressi
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178291758
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-178291319
**[Test build #50517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50517/consoleFull)**
for PR 10904 at commit
[`200a5df`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178291029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11010#issuecomment-178291024
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178291030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11010#issuecomment-178291023
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
201 - 300 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
