Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-178173549
Also, follow-up question: have you tested this with cluster mode and/or
with dynamic allocation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10915#issuecomment-178172474
Can you close this PR now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10996
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178169642
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178169641
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10991#issuecomment-178169443
cc @andrewor14, @squito for thoughts on above
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178169396
I see, that seems unnecessary. We deleted all the code path that would
parse the format so it's pretty much impossible for it to be picked up right?
---
If your pro
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10996#issuecomment-178169426
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178169324
Can you include the generated code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178169233
**[Test build #50493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50493/consoleFull)**
for PR 11004 at commit
[`326a213`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#issuecomment-178168455
**[Test build #50499 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50499/consoleFull)**
for PR 10908 at commit
[`2ea2d54`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10915#issuecomment-178167383
Thanks, merged to branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178167283
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178167285
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178166829
sure - that was just to make sure it doesn't get picked up, as a negative
test. I can purge all of that since it seems both you and @vanzin have the same
feedback?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178166922
**[Test build #50494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50494/consoleFull)**
for PR 10998 at commit
[`02f2a25`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178166468
@felixcheung this looks great! I'm excited about how many lines of code
we're deleting in this patch. I had one question about the tests but this is
good to go other
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#discussion_r51472679
--- Diff: .rat-excludes ---
@@ -63,14 +63,15 @@ logs
.*dependency-reduced-pom.xml
known_translations
json_expectation
-local-14229817592
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10901
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#discussion_r51472337
--- Diff:
core/src/test/resources/spark-events/local-1425081759268/EVENT_LOG_1 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{"Event":"SparkListenerBlockManagerAdded","Block
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11002#issuecomment-178160294
This change looks good to me, maybe @JoshRosen who was the last to touch
that line can take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178159771
Could we merge this please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10901#issuecomment-178163321
Merging to master and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#issuecomment-178162846
@drcrallen This looks great, thanks for fixing the issue. I left a few
minor comments. Once you fix them I'll merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51471696
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-178161088
LGTM, thanks for adding a bunch of tests!
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51471308
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -364,7 +379,27 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470918
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -364,7 +379,27 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470974
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -364,7 +379,27 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10431#issuecomment-178158109
Yeah, since its labeled experimental, I'd like to fix as many Dataset bugs
as we can for 1.6.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470346
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470296
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -60,6 +62,12 @@ private[spark] class Coar
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178153656
Hm, I think `block` is also not `accurate`. Never mind, just update the
title should be enough.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178151805
**[Test build #50498 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50498/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
[`7147b3f`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178146931
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-178151143
Looks like this is failing real tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178150124
> @zsxwing Other than the PR title - I think everything else says inflight
in code/documentation. Did you see anything to the contrary ?
I mean changing `reques
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178147379
**[Test build #2486 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2486/consoleFull)**
for PR 10989 at commit
[`c1c0588`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178146926
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178144361
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178143406
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178143411
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-178142661
hi @steveloughran sorry for another really long delay on my end. mostly
this looks fine, there are some style nits and a couple of comments that need
updating. I also l
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178141964
@zsxwing Other than the PR title - I think everything else says inflight in
code/documentation. Did you see anything to the contrary ?
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-178139377
Thanks, merging to master and 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-178139026
jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user iyounus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-178134675
For the case (3), I'm assuming that the label and features are not
standardized. So, in that case, the solution exists. Here is my perspective on
this.
The nor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178133351
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178133344
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006
[SPARK-10820][SQL] Support for the continuous execution of structured
queries
This is a follow up to 9aadcffabd226557174f3ff566927f873c71672e that
extends Spark SQL to allow users to _repeatedly_
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934#issuecomment-178132065
I did not merge this into 1.6 or before because of 2 reasons:
- It doesn't merge cleanly, and more importantly
- This changes internal semantics and it's not t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934#issuecomment-178130645
Merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934#discussion_r51463360
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/CheckpointSuite.scala ---
@@ -821,6 +821,75 @@ class CheckpointSuite extends TestSuiteBase w
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178129985
@tgravescs in general, this patch doesn't limit number of concurrent
outbound connections. Instead, it just limits number of in flight blocks. Could
you update the titl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178128143
**[Test build #50494 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50494/consoleFull)**
for PR 10998 at commit
[`02f2a25`](https://gi
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#discussion_r51462376
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedPlainValuesReader.java
---
@@ -52,15 +55,49 @@ public void skip
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#discussion_r51462281
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedRleValuesReader.java
---
@@ -180,6 +188,152 @@ public void read
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11005#issuecomment-178126949
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user huaxingao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11005
[SPARK-12506][SPARK-12126][SQL]use CatalystScan for JDBCRelation
As suggested https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9182?focusedCommentId=15031526&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issue
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#discussion_r51461171
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -31,22 +33,20 @@
* TODO: replaced it by batched column
Github user huaxingao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10750#issuecomment-178119526
@viirya @HyukjinKwon @rxin
Thank you all very much for your comments. I will change JDBCRelation to
implement CatalystScan, and then directly access Catalyst ex
Github user huaxingao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10750
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10431#issuecomment-178118573
@marmbrus Should we backport this to branch-1.6? I missed @yhuai's comment
above and haven't done it yet.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178118188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178118185
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178117669
**[Test build #50492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50492/consoleFull)**
for PR 10928 at commit
[`4934ad3`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178112452
**[Test build #50493 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50493/consoleFull)**
for PR 11004 at commit
[`326a213`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178097238
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178097245
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178096904
**[Test build #50490 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50490/consoleFull)**
for PR 11004 at commit
[`8247d8e`](https://g
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51451496
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,667 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51451010
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +297,197 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51450652
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -21,16 +21,29 @@ import java.net.{HttpURLConnection, URL}
im
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51450618
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -44,7 +57,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.ResetSystemProperties
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51450584
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -21,16 +21,29 @@ import java.net.{HttpURLConnection, URL}
im
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51449903
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51447527
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -666,6 +804,40 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51447480
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -666,6 +804,40 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51447272
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -613,13 +739,23 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51446839
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -386,24 +437,49 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51446687
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -42,6 +42,35 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{Clock, SystemClock,
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51445356
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,658 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51444707
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -430,8 +517,55 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r51444027
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,667 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178062076
**[Test build #50492 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50492/consoleFull)**
for PR 10928 at commit
[`4934ad3`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178061786
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178061788
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178056994
**[Test build #50490 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50490/consoleFull)**
for PR 11004 at commit
[`8247d8e`](https://gi
Github user blbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-178055015
Moved the enum column to `c14` to keep real and double arrays next to each
other.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004
[SPARK-10605][SQL] Add structs to collect_list/collect_set
We currently use the Hive implementations for the
```collect_list```/```collect_set``` aggregate functions. This has a few major
drawb
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9007#issuecomment-178009731
@tdas I'd like to merge unless you object. I also find this a useful
developer API.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9007#issuecomment-178008540
@tdas @srowen Can we either get this merged, or officially close off the
possibility of merging it?
People are still raising specific issues on a fairly regu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11002#issuecomment-177996778
**[Test build #50489 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50489/consoleFull)**
for PR 11002 at commit
[`4b846dd`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11002#issuecomment-177997036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11002#issuecomment-177997035
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10983#issuecomment-177969053
@hvanhovell, Yea I tried to merge my branch
(https://github.com/jayadevanmurali/spark/tree/branch-0.1-SPARK-SPARK-12982)
with apache spark master. But I cant se
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11003#issuecomment-177968286
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
501 - 600 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
