Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188661197
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188660473
**[Test build #51935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51935/consoleFull)**
for PR 11324 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059562
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059544
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059585
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059572
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059552
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059534
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059489
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r54059524
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user vectorijk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11321#issuecomment-188658913
@mengxr, Thanks for replying!
Definitely, I will post a rough draft proposal on JIRA later.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Xiangrui Meng
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#discussion_r54059178
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11360
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#discussion_r54058886
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -81,8 +82,20 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
new
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11360#issuecomment-188658196
Thanks - going to merge this in master and branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user zhonghaihua commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#discussion_r54058736
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -81,8 +82,20 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
new
Github user zhonghaihua commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#discussion_r54058368
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10566#issuecomment-188656355
**[Test build #51943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51943/consoleFull)**
for PR 10566 at commit
Github user lin-zhao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11176#discussion_r54057678
--- Diff:
external/akka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/akka/ActorReceiver.scala
---
@@ -162,6 +177,18 @@ abstract class JavaActorReceiver
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#discussion_r54057627
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -81,8 +82,20 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
new
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11321#issuecomment-188651306
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
For GSoC, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13489 to
collect some project ideas. Let's move our discussion
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#discussion_r54057531
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11321
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188647418
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11349#discussion_r54056540
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +47,17 @@ class HiveMetastoreCatalogSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-188647094
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-188647091
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-188646971
**[Test build #51926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51926/consoleFull)**
for PR 11347 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11349#discussion_r54055804
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -542,7 +542,14 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-188640712
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-188640714
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11347#issuecomment-188640208
**[Test build #51925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51925/consoleFull)**
for PR 11347 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9097#issuecomment-188638097
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9097#issuecomment-188638099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9097#issuecomment-188637662
**[Test build #51929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51929/consoleFull)**
for PR 9097 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10753#issuecomment-188634972
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10753#issuecomment-188634976
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10753#issuecomment-188634859
**[Test build #51930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51930/consoleFull)**
for PR 10753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364#issuecomment-188634685
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364#issuecomment-188634677
**[Test build #51939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51939/consoleFull)**
for PR 11364 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364#issuecomment-188634683
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188634681
**[Test build #51942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51942/consoleFull)**
for PR 11363 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11236#issuecomment-188634551
@nongli @rxin ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188634349
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364#issuecomment-188634330
Note that Jenkins will fail, until we merge #11363
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188634322
**[Test build #51937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51937/consoleFull)**
for PR 11363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188634351
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11354#issuecomment-188633958
**[Test build #51940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51940/consoleFull)**
for PR 11354 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188633964
**[Test build #51941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51941/consoleFull)**
for PR 11324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364#issuecomment-188633957
**[Test build #51939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51939/consoleFull)**
for PR 11364 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364#issuecomment-188633707
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188633649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11364
[SPARK-13487][SQL] User-facing RuntimeConfig interface
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch creates the public API for runtime configuration and an
implementation for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188633638
**[Test build #51936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51936/consoleFull)**
for PR 11363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188633652
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188633506
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188633385
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188633381
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188633059
**[Test build #51933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51933/consoleFull)**
for PR 11356 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-188633095
**[Test build #51938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51938/consoleFull)**
for PR 10794 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188632407
**[Test build #51937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51937/consoleFull)**
for PR 11363 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188632012
cc @cloud-fan for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#discussion_r54052828
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/TestSQLContext.scala ---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ private[sql] class TestSQLContext(sc: SparkContext)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363#issuecomment-188631746
**[Test build #51936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51936/consoleFull)**
for PR 11363 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11363
[SPARK-13486][SQL] Move SQLConf into an internal package
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch moves SQLConf into org.apache.spark.sql.internal package to make
it very
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188631576
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188631579
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188631382
**[Test build #51932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51932/consoleFull)**
for PR 11356 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11361#issuecomment-188629681
Can you take a look why would 2 queries take 13 mins?
```
EXPLAIN
SELECT count(1) FROM (
SELECT key, value FROM src UNION ALL
SELECT key, value
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188627486
**[Test build #51934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51934/consoleFull)**
for PR 11324 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188627492
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188627490
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188627467
**[Test build #51935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51935/consoleFull)**
for PR 11324 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11361#issuecomment-188627434
@rxin Looks like HiveCompatibilitySuite.union16 doesn't hang from this. But
it actually takes long time to finish that test (`[info] - union16 (13 minutes,
21
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11361#issuecomment-188626798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11361#issuecomment-188626796
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11324#issuecomment-188626411
**[Test build #51934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51934/consoleFull)**
for PR 11324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11361#issuecomment-188626175
**[Test build #51928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51928/consoleFull)**
for PR 11361 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11360#issuecomment-188625878
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11360#issuecomment-188625881
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11360#issuecomment-188624899
**[Test build #51927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51927/consoleFull)**
for PR 11360 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11346#issuecomment-188622694
@steveloughran do we also needs an update for master branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11358#issuecomment-188621725
This looks like it might affect HDFS tokens as well and error that looks
like this might come up during the initial token renewal:
```
WARN
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10241#discussion_r54049969
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -318,6 +318,14 @@ If you need a reference to the proper location to put
log files in the YARN so t
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11358#issuecomment-188615270
So I have not tested using the keytab-based login with proxy user stuff at
all. We get delegation tokens even there - does this issue affect that as well?
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11359#issuecomment-188613970
@sameeragarwal you should update the pr description to actually include
what this patch does (in addition to that it was built on an earlier pr).
For code gen
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11208#discussion_r54048383
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -369,28 +370,83 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188613807
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-18865
**[Test build #51933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51933/consoleFull)**
for PR 11356 at commit
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11362#issuecomment-188610588
@mengxr can you review it when you have time? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#discussion_r54047942
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +71,41 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11362#issuecomment-188609863
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11362#issuecomment-188609862
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11362#issuecomment-188609806
**[Test build #51931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51931/consoleFull)**
for PR 11362 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#discussion_r54047585
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +71,41 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11354#issuecomment-188608671
**[Test build #2583 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2583/consoleFull)**
for PR 11354 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#issuecomment-188608553
**[Test build #51932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51932/consoleFull)**
for PR 11356 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11356#discussion_r54047396
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +71,41 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo
