Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-198007480
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#discussion_r56406626
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -65,6 +72,106 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return False
+class TypeConv
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197827330
**[Test build #53420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53420/consoleFull)**
for PR 11769 at commit
[`5b7279f`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11734#issuecomment-197537154
Oh, @vanzin .
Sorry for writing comments at the closed PR.
I've read your concern and investigate some. The root cause was
`GenerateMIMAIgnore.scala`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-198138468
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-198094579
**[Test build #53471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53471/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`f679e14`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11817#issuecomment-198295919
**[Test build #53529 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53529/consoleFull)**
for PR 11817 at commit
[`0ee7072`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#issuecomment-198569180
**[Test build #53565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53565/consoleFull)**
for PR 11709 at commit
[`b0cd621`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11735#issuecomment-197351215
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-197585623
**[Test build #53344 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53344/consoleFull)**
for PR 11747 at commit
[`a950ffc`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11797#issuecomment-198203581
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11818#issuecomment-198318580
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11826#issuecomment-198473954
**[Test build #53546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53546/consoleFull)**
for PR 11826 at commit
[`312e4ff`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11749#issuecomment-197595610
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11447#issuecomment-197883529
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11722#issuecomment-197866820
**[Test build #53423 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53423/consoleFull)**
for PR 11722 at commit
[`665bf50`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11759#discussion_r56611882
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -218,48 +218,64 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends QueryPlan[SparkPla
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197898733
**[Test build #53426 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53426/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`004b19d`](https://g
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11824#discussion_r56692821
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -2443,29 +2401,26 @@ Please refer to the project for more details.
# Where to Go from Here
* Ad
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11808#issuecomment-198475938
@sameeragarwal At least, TimestampType is not supported.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11645#discussion_r56390002
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apach
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11701#issuecomment-197473498
**[Test build #5 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 11701 at commit
[`1fd489c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11768#issuecomment-197541540
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user wangyang1992 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11762
[SPARK-13934][SQL] Fixed table name parsing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
val tableName = "1e34abcd"
hc.sql("select 123").registerTempTable(tableName)
hc.dropT
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197899321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-198044655
**[Test build #53461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53461/consoleFull)**
for PR 9229 at commit
[`e5bef10`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11108#discussion_r56434392
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/JavaStratifiedSamplingExample.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11804#discussion_r56732082
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -52,13 +55,28 @@ class StreamExecution(
/** Mini
Github user yy2016 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11795#issuecomment-198100608
@yhuai
How about this change ?
```
diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
index 92a32e7..bdb0408 100644
--- a/pom.xml
+++ b/pom.xml
@@ -1800,6 +1800,7
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#discussion_r56428259
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -268,6 +275,140 @@ private[sql] class Defau
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11799#issuecomment-19839
**[Test build #53476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53476/consoleFull)**
for PR 11799 at commit
[`9fdb852`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-197585737
Sorry for the confusiong. When I said "current accumulator user facing
API", I literally meant the current one in Spark master branch right now.
---
If your project is s
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11794#discussion_r56690434
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -293,7 +293,15 @@ private void growPointerArrayIfN
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11605#issuecomment-197875599
**[Test build #53422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53422/consoleFull)**
for PR 11605 at commit
[`90cf309`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197554367
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11696#issuecomment-197502136
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11768 is the commit for generator. To
avoid of destroying @cloud-fan's branch by any accident, I create that new PR.
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-197460528
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11765#issuecomment-197495711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11410#issuecomment-198457241
**[Test build #53541 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53541/consoleFull)**
for PR 11410 at commit
[`41c2cc5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198079212
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11774#issuecomment-197659095
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197592697
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11208#issuecomment-197634281
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-197569435
BTW, a different approach where the list of known configs is kept by the
code in `o.a.s.internal.config` would make this change simpler. The main reason
I didn't do that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-198138028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11822#issuecomment-198321275
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-197382565
**[Test build #53321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53321/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
[`2965e93`](https://gi
Github user joan38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#issuecomment-198816120
Damn, it failed again! Should we try with 100ms?
I just pushed the 100ms version.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user joan38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11747#discussion_r56757462
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListenerSuite.scala ---
@@ -255,21 +262,19 @@ class SparkListenerSuite extends SparkFunSuite wit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11701#issuecomment-198050192
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11735#issuecomment-197277577
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11701#issuecomment-197497522
**[Test build #53336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53336/consoleFull)**
for PR 11701 at commit
[`20d2e2a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11801#issuecomment-198162212
**[Test build #53481 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53481/consoleFull)**
for PR 11801 at commit
[`43d8161`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11782#issuecomment-198336881
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11676#discussion_r56455176
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +155,7 @@ case class Filter(condition: Expression, child:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197554041
**[Test build #53341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53341/consoleFull)**
for PR 11769 at commit
[`4fcf4e2`](https://g
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769
[SPARK-13826][SQL] Revises Dataset ScalaDoc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR revises Dataset API ScalaDoc. All public methods are divided into
the following g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11722#issuecomment-197272455
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11709#issuecomment-197615064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197589588
Now I cleaned up the description of this PR and JIRA consistently.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11745#issuecomment-197730305
**[Test build #53400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53400/consoleFull)**
for PR 11745 at commit
[`b853e01`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11798
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11620#issuecomment-197558093
**[Test build #53347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53347/consoleFull)**
for PR 11620 at commit
[`91f72a9`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10231#issuecomment-198501179
**[Test build #53552 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53552/consoleFull)**
for PR 10231 at commit
[`a847bc9`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-197276405
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11770#issuecomment-197589743
**[Test build #53370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53370/consoleFull)**
for PR 11770 at commit
[`74e51b1`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11775#issuecomment-197787129
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11823#issuecomment-198326602
**[Test build #53536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53536/consoleFull)**
for PR 11823 at commit
[`aacf266`](https://g
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#issuecomment-197557069
@dbtsai There is a good chance of precision loss during the computation of
A^T A is A is ill-conditioned. A better approach is to factorize A directly. It
is similar to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11769#issuecomment-197862620
**[Test build #53427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53427/consoleFull)**
for PR 11769 at commit
[`50502a5`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11797#issuecomment-198206057
**[Test build #53503 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53503/consoleFull)**
for PR 11797 at commit
[`696ea5c`](https://gi
Github user yy2016 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11787#issuecomment-197974831
bq. Why not just increase the pattern match analysis budget
There is a chance the new budget gets exceeded in the future when more
cases are added.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11775#issuecomment-197787132
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-198468855
**[Test build #2651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2651/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
[`c5d0bcf`](https://
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764
[SPARK-13928] Move org.apache.spark.Logging into
org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Logging was made private in Spark 2.0. If we move i
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11095#discussion_r56636220
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -256,7 +261,20 @@ public MemoryBlock allocatePage(long size,
MemoryConsume
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197764401
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11810#issuecomment-198240058
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11724#discussion_r56385761
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -108,14 +109,38 @@ private[csv] object CSVInferS
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11798#issuecomment-198198220
@JoshRosen It seems that tuning `scalac.patmat.analysisBudget` doesn't work
for this case. According to [Scala compiler code][1],
`-Dscalac.patmat.analysisBudget=off`
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11108#discussion_r56435017
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/HypothesisTestingExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11108#discussion_r56434972
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/HypothesisTestingExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11784#discussion_r56616389
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -508,12 +508,10 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel privat
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11776#issuecomment-197778301
Merged to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11108#discussion_r56434617
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/python/mllib/hypothesis_testing_kolmogorov_smirnov_test_example.py
---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11768#issuecomment-198471908
Closing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-197579760
**[Test build #53355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53355/consoleFull)**
for PR 11748 at commit
[`719ad3c`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748#issuecomment-198177377
**[Test build #53489 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53489/consoleFull)**
for PR 11748 at commit
[`2970932`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11756#issuecomment-197628087
This makes sense to me. Actually for CSV, when `any row does not have a
same schema`, it just means `corrupted format`, as CSV has a very simple format
and can always
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9884#discussion_r56428301
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -298,4 +412,51 @@ private class VectorAttributeRewriter(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11764#issuecomment-197628092
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11831#issuecomment-198543400
**[Test build #53563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53563/consoleFull)**
for PR 11831 at commit
[`cfe89e9`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11297#issuecomment-197720740
**[Test build #53397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53397/consoleFull)**
for PR 11297 at commit
[`29a4f59`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11759#discussion_r56455618
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -218,48 +218,64 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends QueryPlan[SparkPla
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#issuecomment-197906450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11774#issuecomment-197658459
**[Test build #53378 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53378/consoleFull)**
for PR 11774 at commit
[`fbb93ca`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11636#issuecomment-198085861
**[Test build #53470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53470/consoleFull)**
for PR 11636 at commit
[`8c9d054`](https://gi
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#discussion_r56406644
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -65,6 +72,106 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return False
+class TypeConv
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11814#issuecomment-198240507
**[Test build #53510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53510/consoleFull)**
for PR 11814 at commit
[`f078796`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11763#issuecomment-197402108
I'm going to merge so I can see if this resolves the failures on the QA
test pull request builder.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
201 - 300 of 1792 matches
Mail list logo
