Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201393204
**[Test build #54195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54195/consoleFull)**
for PR 11911 at commit
[`f59c85f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201393248
**[Test build #54194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54194/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`5eb63b6`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11920#issuecomment-201392194
Thank you for the positive feedback. Indeed, it was just one-line change to
block `reset`.
All the others changes in that file is just about ScalaStyle correct
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57471001
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,65 @@ class StreamExecution(
priv
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11714
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201389883
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57470403
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,65 @@ class StreamExecution(
priva
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#discussion_r57470219
--- Diff: bin/pyspark ---
@@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ if [[ -n "$IPYTHON_OPTS" || "$IPYTHON" == "1" ]]; then
# If IPython options are specified, assume user want
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201385697
**[Test build #54193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54193/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
[`631c44c`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11920#issuecomment-201385003
OK. If it's pretty simple and there is no good reason to call reset (since
it kills the `SparkContext`) maybe it is worth blocking after all.
---
If your project is set
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201383708
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201383515
**[Test build #54192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54192/consoleFull)**
for PR 11623 at commit
[`c0e73cd`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201383385
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201383428
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201382523
**[Test build #54191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54191/consoleFull)**
for PR 11953 at commit
[`2f43d41`](https://gi
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201382352
thanks, done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57468288
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -291,10 +308,10 @@ private[orc] case class OrcTableScan(
val
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950#issuecomment-201381524
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201381299
**[Test build #54190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54190/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`01d9f0d`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57467951
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +123,66 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends FileFormat
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57467872
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +123,66 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends FileFormat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201379414
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201379419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201378991
**[Test build #54187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54187/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
[`d8f5d6e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201378536
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201378532
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201376467
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201376305
**[Test build #54188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54188/consoleFull)**
for PR 11934 at commit
[`947fc70`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201376459
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201376311
**[Test build #54175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54175/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
[`631c44c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201376017
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201376022
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201375885
**[Test build #54186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54186/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
[`080a506`](https://g
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201375961
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57465871
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201374973
**[Test build #54187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54187/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
[`d8f5d6e`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201374918
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#discussion_r57465383
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -246,9 +246,7 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201373865
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201373903
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-201373343
Overall looks good. Let's fix the serialization issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57465176
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ private[sql] object FileSourceStra
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201373230
**[Test build #54183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54183/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
[`a26973e`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57465015
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201370479
Cool, guess I'll wait for those, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201370396
Let me submit a PR for parsing `TOK_DESCDATABASE` and `TOK_DROPDATABASE`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201369432
However, #11895 is blocked by #11940. It can not pass tests :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201368662
@vanzio I fixed it in #11895
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57464019
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ private[sql] object FileSourceStra
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201361949
cc @jkbradley whenever you get a chance, could you take a look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57462957
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JSONRelation.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +122,39 @@ class DefaultSource extends File
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57462916
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -119,6 +119,31 @@ class GBTClassifierSuite extends SparkFun
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57462635
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -222,16 +222,10 @@ final class RandomForestClassificati
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201359154
this is the same flaky test that's failing in other places with maven...
let me see if it's easy to fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201358136
**[Test build #54186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54186/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
[`080a506`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201357380
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201357385
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961
[SPARK-11730][ML] Add feature importances for GBTs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that GBTs have been moved to ML, they can use the implementation of
feature impor
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201357116
**[Test build #54179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54179/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
[`5319ced`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201356605
**[Test build #54185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54185/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`976ce2c`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201355617
once more with sbt... retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11871#issuecomment-201353993
**[Test build #54184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54184/consoleFull)**
for PR 11871 at commit
[`789342f`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#discussion_r57459785
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -53,12 +54,19 @@ case class CreateDatabase(
extends NativeDDLC
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11916#discussion_r57459040
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -620,6 +620,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
/
Github user liyintang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11921
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liyintang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11921#issuecomment-201347094
Thanks @koeninger for the review and insightful comments ! It has been
great start experience to contribute to the community.
For this PR, I think it makes se
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10669#issuecomment-201347045
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10676#issuecomment-201347040
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201346907
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201346909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201346656
**[Test build #54177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54177/consoleFull)**
for PR 11959 at commit
[`f0c43b9`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11828
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11745
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-201345705
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201345745
#11828 Has been merged, could you enable `union20` here ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-201345704
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11828#issuecomment-201345415
Merging into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-20134
**[Test build #54180 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54180/consoleFull)**
for PR 11960 at commit
[`3efd4a1`](https://g
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11920#issuecomment-201341699
Hi, @srowen .
Recently Jenkins was a little bit flakey.
How do you think about this PR now?
The code is the same. It is just rebased to pass the test.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11938#discussion_r57456787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -31,17 +32,34 @@ import
org.apache.spark.sql.cat
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57456602
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +123,66 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends FileFor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#issuecomment-201339819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#issuecomment-201339820
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#issuecomment-201339654
**[Test build #54176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54176/consoleFull)**
for PR 11829 at commit
[`e1a0c40`](https://g
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#discussion_r57455819
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -246,9 +246,7 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming]
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201336839
LGTM except the minor issue. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#discussion_r57455505
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -149,6 +151,8 @@ class JavaMLWritable(MLWritable):
(Private) Mixin for ML instances that provide :py:cl
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#discussion_r57455467
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -134,13 +134,15 @@ class MLWritable(object):
.. versionadded:: 2.0.0
"""
+@prope
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57455299
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +123,66 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends FileFor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201332626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r57454374
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201332833
**[Test build #54183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54183/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
[`a26973e`](https://gi
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201332718
Just realized the problem while washing dishes...
The above comment is a false alarm. The real problem is that I ignored
start position and length of the `Par
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201332624
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201332513
**[Test build #54181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54181/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
[`cf02cf8`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201332139
**[Test build #54182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54182/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
[`2cbb56d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201332145
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201332143
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201331875
**[Test build #54182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54182/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
[`2cbb56d`](https://gi
401 - 500 of 657 matches
Mail list logo
