Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12184#issuecomment-206007445
**[Test build #55029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55029/consoleFull)**
for PR 12184 at commit
GitHub user rekhajoshm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12184
[SPARK-14372] [SQL] : Dataset.randomSplit() needs a Java version
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.Added method randomSplitAsList() in Dataset for java
##
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#discussion_r58622864
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#discussion_r58622715
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -292,11 +357,53 @@ case class AlterTableSetFileFormat(
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#issuecomment-206006902
This change looks good to me pending tests/MiMa & possibly user
verification - we should also either add a follow up JIRA for the Python API or
add it in this PR.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-206005487
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-206005690
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-206005390
**[Test build #55002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55002/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-206005481
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-206005685
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-206005141
**[Test build #55018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55018/consoleFull)**
for PR 12180 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12183#issuecomment-206004627
@rekhajoshm Thank you for working on this! I think there are other methods
in SessionCatalog that handle an existing table/db/function that do not check
the existence of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12156#issuecomment-206004514
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12156#issuecomment-206004520
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12156#issuecomment-206004093
**[Test build #55015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55015/consoleFull)**
for PR 12156 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user joan38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#discussion_r58621915
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -81,9 +81,43 @@ case class MultipleConstructorsData(a:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-206002113
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-206002116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-206001889
**[Test build #55016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55016/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#issuecomment-206001580
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#issuecomment-206001577
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-206001541
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-206001545
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12183#issuecomment-205999728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205999807
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user rekhajoshm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12183
[SPARK-14410] [SQL] : SessionCatalog needs to check database/table/function
existence
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.Check for existence of Function in catalog,
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#issuecomment-205997358
Seems "Checking for ability to automatically mergeâ¦" is taking a long
time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#issuecomment-205996108
LGTM. Just have one comment for altering the location of a partition. But,
we can address that in a follow-up PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-205995990
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-205995991
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#discussion_r58618637
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -232,6 +234,96 @@ public MapData getMap(int
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#discussion_r58618530
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -292,11 +357,53 @@ case class AlterTableSetFileFormat(
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#discussion_r58618579
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -292,11 +357,53 @@ case class AlterTableSetFileFormat(
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-205993243
I don't think it should be needed for OnHeap (it uses Platform.getInt which
I think should work for both). For offheap, as far as I know, only a few of the
puts that
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12078#discussion_r58617810
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#issuecomment-205991505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#issuecomment-205991503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#issuecomment-205991469
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#discussion_r58617460
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -232,6 +234,96 @@ public MapData getMap(int ordinal) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#issuecomment-205991229
**[Test build #55011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55011/consoleFull)**
for PR 12121 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#discussion_r58616584
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -553,9 +553,13 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder extends
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12143#issuecomment-205988320
Please do not delete JavaDeveloperApiExample.java AFAIK, this is the only
code example we have for Java developers who want to build custom ML pipelines.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-205988357
**[Test build #55023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55023/consoleFull)**
for PR 12174 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-205987308
LGTM pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-205987295
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12181#issuecomment-205987176
**[Test build #55022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55022/consoleFull)**
for PR 12181 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12181#issuecomment-205986809
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-205986042
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-205986044
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12181#issuecomment-205985264
```
[warn] Java 8 tests will not run because JDK version is < 1.8.
```
I think that the default PR builder might still be running Java 7 because
my
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12031#discussion_r58614159
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -315,14 +326,23 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
} catch {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12031#discussion_r58613975
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -191,10 +194,18 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
logInfo(s"Executor
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#discussion_r58613973
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -205,4 +210,20 @@ private[sql] object
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12031#discussion_r58613857
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
/** Whether this task
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#discussion_r58613895
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -137,10 +140,12 @@ private[sql] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205983611
**[Test build #55020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55020/consoleFull)**
for PR 12182 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205982806
**[Test build #55019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55019/consoleFull)**
for PR 12182 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205982721
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205982625
The change itself LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205982437
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205982422
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user infynyxx commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205982310
@hvanhovell I didn't create JIRA ticket because as per [Contributing
Guide](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark)
creating JIRA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205982150
**[Test build #55004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55004/consoleFull)**
for PR 12178 at commit
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12020#issuecomment-205981531
Thanks @holdenk and @jkbradley, I'll fix them soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#discussion_r58612163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -86,4 +87,8 @@ class FileScanRDD(
}
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#discussion_r58611815
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -620,17 +621,28 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
if (paths.length >=
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#issuecomment-205980533
So if we are going to add this - it might make sense to also add the Python
API at the same time (or at least create a JIRA to track adding this to the
Python API so
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12136
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205979054
@infynyxx could you add a JIRA ticket and create a ticket like
`[SPARK-][BUILD] use https while downloading binaries` (see the titles of
other PRs).
---
If
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12143#issuecomment-205978731
Awesome :) A few minor things found while reviewing:
One thing I noticed while looking at the differences between the code we
are deleting and the code we are
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-205978561
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-205978659
**[Test build #55018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55018/consoleFull)**
for PR 12180 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-205978313
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#issuecomment-205978307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-205978292
**[Test build #55017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55017/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-205978315
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#issuecomment-205978310
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#discussion_r58610193
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -840,14 +827,13 @@
org.apache.avro
avro-mapred
${avro.version}
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#issuecomment-205978280
**[Test build #55013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55013/consoleFull)**
for PR 12166 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175#issuecomment-205978170
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-205978037
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175#issuecomment-205977980
Finally, I passed the Jenkins with the updated code.
Please let me know if there is something I missed.
Thank you, @marmbrus and @srowen .
---
If your
GitHub user infynyxx opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182
use https while downloading binaries
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`./build/mvn` file was downloading binaries in non HTTPS mode. This PR
tends to fix it.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-205977677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-205977671
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-205977250
**[Test build #55003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55003/consoleFull)**
for PR 11570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-205976944
**[Test build #55012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55012/consoleFull)**
for PR 12180 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-205976976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-205976978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11219#issuecomment-205975994
I don't think this should be public. If this is needed for the
DataFrame-based API, then we should discuss providing the evaluation metric
classes within the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12156#issuecomment-205975799
**[Test build #55015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55015/consoleFull)**
for PR 12156 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-205975829
**[Test build #55016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55016/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-205975808
**[Test build #55017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55017/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12181#issuecomment-205975784
**[Test build #55014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55014/consoleFull)**
for PR 12181 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12180#issuecomment-205975113
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12181
[SPARK-14359] Unit tests for java 8 lambda syntax with typed aggregates
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds unit tests for java 8 lambda syntax with typed aggregates as
Github user ericl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12181#issuecomment-205974560
@rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12136#issuecomment-205974356
LGTM, merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
401 - 500 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
