Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217353911
**[Test build #57964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57964/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-217353785
@yhuai Agree! Actually, I initially tried to do it in a batch mode. That is
the following API we need to use
```
public List dropPartitions(String dbName,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217352598
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217352599
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217352525
**[Test build #57959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57959/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217351727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217351726
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217351688
**[Test build #57963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57963/consoleFull)**
for PR 12918 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217349774
**[Test build #57963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57963/consoleFull)**
for PR 12918 at commit
Github user mwws closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11101
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mwws closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-217349115
@srowen @zsxwing could you help merge itï¼
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217348849
**[Test build #57962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57962/consoleFull)**
for PR 12947 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348813
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348812
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348761
**[Test build #57961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57961/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217348613
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217348611
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217348567
**[Test build #57957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57957/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947
[SPARK-14476][SQL] Improves the output of dataset.explain by adding source
table names and file paths.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the physical plan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217348014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348026
**[Test build #57961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57961/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217348013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217347997
**[Test build #57956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57956/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217347901
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217347900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217347818
**[Test build #57955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57955/consoleFull)**
for PR 12926 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217347602
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217347601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217347534
**[Test build #57954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57954/consoleFull)**
for PR 12898 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217347142
@MLnick Args-Parsing was removed in those examples
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#discussion_r62287954
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ def roc(self):
Returns the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217346608
Happy to, I was going to leave those files for the people working in them
during QA but I can update them as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217346237
I like it! @holdenk Could you make change for all links in spark.ml docs? I
found there are links in ```regression.py```, ```recommendation.py``` and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946#issuecomment-217345558
**[Test build #57960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57960/consoleFull)**
for PR 12946 at commit
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946
[SPARK-15085][Streaming][Kafka] Rename streaming-kafka artifact to inâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Renaming the streaming-kafka artifact to include kafka version, in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217344576
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217344567
**[Test build #57958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57958/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217344578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217344297
**[Test build #57959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57959/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217343853
**[Test build #57958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57958/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217343655
I'm updating the title of the PR to reflect the change in approach. I think
the boolean property will be sufficient.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217343071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217343068
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217343030
**[Test build #57957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57957/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217342999
**[Test build #57951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57951/consoleFull)**
for PR 12856 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62286319
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ private[ml] trait
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62286255
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ private[ml] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217341678
**[Test build #57956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57956/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62286043
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/_shared_params_code_gen.py ---
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ def __init__(self):
if defaultValueStr is not None:
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217341428
True. So really the desired behavior is always just to ignore `*`
resources. A boolean property would suffice here. What about
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285930
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/_shared_params_code_gen.py ---
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ def __init__(self):
if defaultValueStr is not None:
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217341006
Yes I am aware of multi roles, but not sure in what situation you would
want to register with multiple roles but only use one role's resources?
---
If your project is
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285684
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -280,7 +281,9 @@ def explainParam(self, param):
else:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217340511
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217340512
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285526
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -280,7 +281,9 @@ def explainParam(self, param):
else:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217340426
**[Test build #57946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57946/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217339830
**[Test build #57955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57955/consoleFull)**
for PR 12926 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285048
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -280,7 +281,9 @@ def explainParam(self, param):
else:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217339397
**[Test build #57954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57954/consoleFull)**
for PR 12898 at commit
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217339163
I see that as a potential solution, however at some future point mesos will
support frameworks which can hold multiple roles (MESOS-1763 ð) so perhaps
leaving it
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62284776
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-217338855
Lets create a wrapper - I think its better for R users.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user bomeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12916#issuecomment-217338702
The test failure was caused by timeout for HiveThriftHttpServerSuite and
SingleSessionSuite... have not figure out the cause, any suggestion will be
welcome.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338674
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338672
**[Test build #57953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57953/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338675
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338558
**[Test build #57953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57953/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217338464
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62284518
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217338463
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217338429
**[Test build #57952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57952/consoleFull)**
for PR 12920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217338062
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217338038
**[Test build #57944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57944/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217338064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-217337928
ping @jkbradley @dbtsai @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217337832
I see, I wonder besides the wildcard role if it ever makes sense to have
two lists of roles, one set that you are registered with and another set you
want to accept
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-217337836
@gatorsmile I am not sure we should ban dropping multiple partitions in a
single call, which is a useful command.
I just took a look at our implementation of
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12204#issuecomment-217337755
ping @cloud-fan @yhuai Please take a look at this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217337677
**[Test build #57952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57952/consoleFull)**
for PR 12920 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12436#issuecomment-217337519
No, this is not the same issue. SPARK-14915 deals with duplicate tasks in
case of Speculation. But this change has nothing to do with Speculation. This
is fixing
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12942#issuecomment-217337276
hm probably not this way because this wouldn't make sense once we make the
catalog mountable. we might want to have some other way to tell though.
---
If your project
Github user taku-k commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#issuecomment-217337159
@MLnick Thank you. I rebased to latest master and resolved conflicts. I
would like you to review my Pull/Req.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62283924
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62283730
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62283685
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62283513
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217336202
**[Test build #57951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57951/consoleFull)**
for PR 12856 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62283467
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ private[ml] trait
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62283462
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62283436
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217335030
**[Test build #57950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57950/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217335041
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217335037
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217334522
**[Test build #57950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57950/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217333974
**[Test build #57949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57949/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217333977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217333976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-217333880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 864 matches
Mail list logo
