Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13329#issuecomment-221974375
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13329#issuecomment-221974106
**[Test build #59395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59395/consoleFull)**
for PR 13329 at commit
[`2e794dc`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#discussion_r64807974
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -448,6 +448,14 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13334#issuecomment-221972267
**[Test build #59407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59407/consoleFull)**
for PR 13334 at commit
[`6361ac5`](https://gi
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13334
[SPARK-15576] Add back hive tests blacklisted by SPARK-15539
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add back hive tests blacklisted by SPARK-15539
## How was this patch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-221971534
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-221971527
**[Test build #59406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59406/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
[`4111b2d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-221971531
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13319#issuecomment-221971263
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13319#issuecomment-221971262
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#issuecomment-221971129
**[Test build #59406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59406/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
[`4111b2d`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13319#issuecomment-221970787
**[Test build #59394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59394/consoleFull)**
for PR 13319 at commit
[`f0f6e85`](https://g
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11033#issuecomment-221970852
thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-221970385
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-221970378
**[Test build #59404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59404/consoleFull)**
for PR 11996 at commit
[`db93d17`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-221970389
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331#issuecomment-221970260
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331#issuecomment-221970262
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331#issuecomment-221969986
**[Test build #59396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59396/consoleFull)**
for PR 13331 at commit
[`a1baec5`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318#issuecomment-221969935
**[Test build #59405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59405/consoleFull)**
for PR 13318 at commit
[`f651956`](https://gi
Github user clockfly commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13271#issuecomment-221969548
@rxin
I have moved the changes about innerChildren to another PR. I also have
updated the description based on your comment (add SQL query).
Please t
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318#discussion_r64805207
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/ShuffleInMemorySorter.java ---
@@ -101,14 +94,17 @@ public void expandPointerArray(LongArray newArr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-221968760
**[Test build #59404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59404/consoleFull)**
for PR 11996 at commit
[`db93d17`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13271#issuecomment-221968745
**[Test build #59403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59403/consoleFull)**
for PR 13271 at commit
[`27328f9`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-221968733
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-221968586
@kayousterhout Thanks a lot for your review and comments. I have fixed
them, please have a look into this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-221968384
Unfortunately, I don't have the code anymore, but I can try to sketch out
what I think the right solution looks like. Basically, the problem is that
`planLater` is a
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-221968007
@xwu0226 thanks for working on this. This patch currently exposes too much
to the user. The config is internal and should be kept that way; that's the
reason why it'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64804537
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
+#
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#discussion_r64804303
--- Diff: conf/spark-defaults.conf.template ---
@@ -25,3 +25,4 @@
# spark.serializer
org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoSerializer
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64803994
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
+#
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-221967254
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-221967104
**[Test build #59402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59402/consoleFull)**
for PR 13139 at commit
[`a00a470`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-221967252
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#discussion_r64804173
--- Diff:
repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/SparkILoop.scala ---
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ class SparkILoop(in0: Option[BufferedReader], out:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#discussion_r64803892
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -585,6 +585,18 @@ class SparkSession private(
sparkContext.stop(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#discussion_r64803748
--- Diff: repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/Main.scala
---
@@ -88,10 +88,22 @@ object Main extends Logging {
}
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#discussion_r64803716
--- Diff: repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/Main.scala
---
@@ -88,10 +88,22 @@ object Main extends Logging {
}
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#issuecomment-221966605
@rdblue Thank you for this PR. Those improvements sound good. I chatted
with others. Here are two questions.
1. `sqlContext.table("source").write.byName.insertInto("de
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-221966464
Thanks for the update @NarineK - The R changes are looking pretty good to
me. Had some minor documentation comments. @sun-rui Could you take one more
look ?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-221966410
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-221966408
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-221966136
**[Test build #59399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59399/consoleFull)**
for PR 13176 at commit
[`39d3dfb`](https://g
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64803396
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
+
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64803455
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
+
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r64803173
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,137 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+## G
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13330#discussion_r64802782
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#issuecomment-221965040
**[Test build #59402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59402/consoleFull)**
for PR 13139 at commit
[`a00a470`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13309
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r64802567
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,137 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+## G
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13307
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r64802545
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,137 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+## G
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13309#issuecomment-221964506
Merging into master 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13307#issuecomment-221964196
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15576
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13271#issuecomment-221962010
**[Test build #59391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59391/consoleFull)**
for PR 13271 at commit
[`296159a`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13307#issuecomment-221963953
OK, let's do that in a follow-up patch. Thanks, merging into master 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-221963853
**[Test build #59400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59400/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
[`5a71f89`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#issuecomment-221963878
**[Test build #59401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59401/consoleFull)**
for PR 13315 at commit
[`d994460`](https://gi
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
[SPARK-13445][SQL]Improves error message and add test coverage for Window
function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add more verbose error message when order by clause
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-221962590
**[Test build #59399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59399/consoleFull)**
for PR 13176 at commit
[`39d3dfb`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11033
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13316#issuecomment-221962589
**[Test build #59398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59398/consoleFull)**
for PR 13316 at commit
[`325a2ea`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13332#issuecomment-221962471
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-221962515
ping?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12919#issuecomment-221962428
ping?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13271#issuecomment-221962312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13271#issuecomment-221962310
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13316#issuecomment-221962144
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
GitHub user sitalkedia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13332
[SPARK-15569] Reduce frequency of updateBytesWritten function in Diskâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Profiling a Spark job spilling large amount of intermediate d
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11033#issuecomment-221961068
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user GayathriMurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#discussion_r64799207
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -145,9 +148,11 @@ for more details on the API.
passed to other algorithms like LDA.
During the f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12824#issuecomment-221958607
**[Test build #59397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59397/consoleFull)**
for PR 12824 at commit
[`1c48d07`](https://gi
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12824#issuecomment-221958301
@trystanleftwich to clarify you get this exception because you are
specifying the config in ms, or the default value is causing this exception?
---
If your project
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12824#issuecomment-221958395
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#discussion_r64796991
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulAggregate.scala
---
@@ -82,40 +82,62 @@ case class StateStoreRestoreExec(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#discussion_r64796697
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/utils.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +34,7 @@ object Utils {
resultExpressions: Seq[Na
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#discussion_r64796643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -319,14 +362,19 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#discussion_r64796289
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -500,6 +500,25 @@ def mode(self, saveMode):
self._jwrite = self._jwrite.mode(saveMode)
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13285#issuecomment-221954150
@yanboliang Can you please help review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#issuecomment-221953361
@andrewor14 The behavior you mentioned is the one I was expecting also.
For some reason it does not work in my env. I was trying for a spark-shell .
What cat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#discussion_r64795297
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -448,6 +448,14 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221952267
Merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#discussion_r64794004
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -289,37 +289,53 @@ case class TruncateTableCommand(
val c
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-221950905
So when I was skimming it last night, it looked like it also drops "a and"
to "and" (which is good) but we might also want to mention.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#discussion_r64793761
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -289,37 +289,53 @@ case class TruncateTableCommand(
val c
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-221950494
Let me rebase and try again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-221948556
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#issuecomment-221949749
{{sql("truncate table emp16") }} should delete all partitions, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331#issuecomment-221949136
**[Test build #59396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59396/consoleFull)**
for PR 13331 at commit
[`a1baec5`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13330#issuecomment-221949059
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331#issuecomment-221948972
LGTM, pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#issuecomment-221949078
@sureshthalamati what behavior did you expect? I would think that
truncating a partitioned table without specifying the specs should just delete
data from all partit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331#discussion_r64792393
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -440,14 +439,16 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCon
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-221948560
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-221948371
**[Test build #59390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59390/consoleFull)**
for PR 13088 at commit
[`9c3bd5a`](https://g
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13331
[SPARK-15550][SQL][WIP] Dataset.show() should show contents nested products
as rows
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses two related issues:
1.
GitHub user xinhhuynh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13330
[MINOR][DOCS] Typo fixes in Dataset scaladoc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Minor typo fixes in Dataset scaladoc
* Corrected return type as DataFrame, not DataSet
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13319#issuecomment-221945433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13139#discussion_r64790223
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -374,6 +374,137 @@ regression model and extracting model summary
statistics.
+#
501 - 600 of 893 matches
Mail list logo
