Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59937/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13469#discussion_r65746393
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ case class CreateExternalRow
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
@subrotosanyal could you update the title to follow the convention?
`[SPARK-][yarn] Summary.` Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59938/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
**[Test build #59938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59938/consoleFull)**
for PR 13499 at commit
[`16ce28c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454#discussion_r65744198
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ abstract class SchedulerIntegrationSuite[T
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65743060
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends Q
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476#discussion_r65742476
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -151,6 +151,40 @@ setMethod("substr", signature(x = "Column"),
column(jc)
})
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #59940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59940/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`153293e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13475
Merging to master / 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
**[Test build #59938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59938/consoleFull)**
for PR 13499 at commit
[`16ce28c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
**[Test build #59939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59939/consoleFull)**
for PR 13446 at commit
[`e892324`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559
@skonto I just merged https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454, please
let me know if that does not address the issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user inouehrs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
I reverted the file mode change. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
ok as this seems to be failing quite commonly in some envs I'm going to
merge this since it fixes the issue, but open to more feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3049/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418
whoops triggered a build on this one... sorry about that
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59937/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3048/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3047/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3044 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3044/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418
**[Test build #3045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3045/consoleFull)**
for PR 13418 at commit
[`77166bc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3046/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59935/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Ok I suspect that not all tables are created in the same way. Added some
code to dump the table metadata.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
**[Test build #59935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59935/consoleFull)**
for PR 13454 at commit
[`08ab5d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
can you revert the file mode change? the test LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13483
@gatorsmile Thanks a lot for your explanation. I agree that if we
internally generate the aggregate expressions that is different than user
specified one , then we should eliminate the duplicate
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59934/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59933/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
**[Test build #59934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59934/consoleFull)**
for PR 13061 at commit
[`031e5b0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
**[Test build #59933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59933/consoleFull)**
for PR 13454 at commit
[`6ef06c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418
@cloud-fan Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13487
Thank you, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user inouehrs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
Since the new encoder framework ([SPARK-15494]) has been merged, my bug fix
part is no longer needed.
I appreciate if the new test case part can be merged. Thanks!
---
If your project is set u
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
**[Test build #59936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59936/consoleFull)**
for PR 13446 at commit
[`3837825`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13492#discussion_r65732323
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ private[sql] object PreInsertCastAndRenam
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59931/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
**[Test build #59931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59931/consoleFull)**
for PR 13496 at commit
[`c809cc6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59932/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59932/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3039 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3039/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3038/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3041/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3040/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3042/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13483
@viirya Based on my understanding, we want to avoid having duplicate output
columns generated by our APIs. If users want to explicitly have two duplicate
output columns, they can specify them in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3043/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user subrotosanyal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
SPARK-15754 Not letting the credentials containing hdfs delegation tokens
to be added in current user credential.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The credentials are n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59930/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #59930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59930/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`8426522`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
**[Test build #59935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59935/consoleFull)**
for PR 13454 at commit
[`08ab5d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
**[Test build #59934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59934/consoleFull)**
for PR 13061 at commit
[`031e5b0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
**[Test build #59933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59933/consoleFull)**
for PR 13454 at commit
[`6ef06c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
thanks for the feedback @vanzin . I updated the comments slightly, which I
hope addresses your concerns.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user amitsela commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13424
I'm guessing here that the PR didn't start a Jenkins build because of the
[WIP] so if a committer could "kick" Jenkins here... Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3043 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3043/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3042/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user amitsela commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13424
I've added a test suite since I couldn't find an existing one that would
fit (I needed to override `beforeAll()`) so I will remove WIP from the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3040/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3041 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3041/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3039 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3039/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3038/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Test failure is unrelated. kicking again.
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59929/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59932/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2c16bcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #59929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59929/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`edea710`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
I'll trigger a bunch of tests and see what happens.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
[SPARK-15011][SQL] Re-enable 'analyze MetastoreRelations' in hive
StatisticsSuite [WIP]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This test re-enables the `analyze MetastoreRelatio
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454#discussion_r65713698
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ abstract class SchedulerIntegrationSuite[T
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
**[Test build #59931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59931/consoleFull)**
for PR 13496 at commit
[`c809cc6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #59930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59930/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`8426522`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #59929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59929/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`edea710`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user xiaowangyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113
@viper-kun It's random!
You can check the code from hive:
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/release-1.2.1/jdbc/src/java/org/apache/hive/jdbc/ZooKeeperHiveClientHelper.java#L53-L93
---
I
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559
A test is failing:
`Map(8 -> 42, 7 -> 42) was not empty
ScalaTestFailureLocation:
org.apache.spark.scheduler.BlacklistIntegrationSuite$$anonfun$1 at
(BlacklistIntegrationSuite.scala:51)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59928/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #59928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59928/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`45b7984`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65692163
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -39,16 +39,16 @@ class MulticlassClassific
Github user jmabuin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13468
I just wrote to the developers list asking this, so I am closing this PR.
Thank you all
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user jmabuin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13468
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13497
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user subrotosanyal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13497
Added a new State (FINISHED_UNKNOWN) for the listeners of SparkLauncher
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This situation can happen when the LauncherConnection gets an ex
Github user vectorijk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r65691008
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1069,6 +1079,8 @@ setMethod("first",
#'
#' @param x A SparkDataFrame
#'
+#' @family SparkDataFrame
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13492
**[Test build #3037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3037/consoleFull)**
for PR 13492 at commit
[`11768e8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
401 - 500 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
