Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61151/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
**[Test build #61151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61151/consoleFull)**
for PR 13881 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13883
Thanks - can you describe the bug in the pr description?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13883
https://gist.github.com/vlad17/964c0a93510d79cb130c33700f6139b7
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884#discussion_r68355286
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -688,6 +688,14 @@ object FoldablePropagation extends
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884#discussion_r68355194
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1541,4 +1541,13 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13883
What is the bug?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
**[Test build #61151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61151/consoleFull)**
for PR 13881 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
**[Test build #61150 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61150/consoleFull)**
for PR 13881 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61150/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
**[Test build #61150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61150/consoleFull)**
for PR 13881 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
having 2 implementations is also kind of a branch: the virtual function
call need to be dispatched between these 2 implementations, while the only one
implementation can be marked as final and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701#discussion_r68353312
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -85,8 +85,15 @@ private[sql] object
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884
**[Test build #61149 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61149/consoleFull)**
for PR 13884 at commit
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13883
[SPARK-16179] [PYSPARK] fix bugs for Python udf in generate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the bug when Python UDF is used in explode (generator),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
**[Test build #61145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61145/consoleFull)**
for PR 13844 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884#discussion_r68353553
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -688,6 +688,14 @@ object FoldablePropagation extends
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884
[SPARK-16181][SQL: outer join with isNull filter may return wrong result
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The root cause is: the output attributes of outer join are
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
@yhuai As I mentioned in the description, I am not sure if we can
manipulate row groups as we want, but I have manually tested it to show the
actually scanned row numbers.
---
If your project is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13883
**[Test build #61148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61148/consoleFull)**
for PR 13883 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61145/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
Thank you for the testing. Can you also test the case that a file contains
multiple row groups and we can avoid of scanning unneeded ones?
Also since it is not fixing a critical bug, let's
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13877
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13877
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks for reviewing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61144/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
**[Test build #61144 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61144/consoleFull)**
for PR 13881 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701#discussion_r68352913
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -85,8 +85,15 @@ private[sql] object
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701#discussion_r68352884
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -85,8 +85,15 @@ private[sql] object
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
**[Test build #61147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61147/consoleFull)**
for PR 13701 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
@cloud-fan , for the first issue, we are on the same page. Your proposal is
what I am thinking about as possible solutions. I will do that.
For the second issue, it seems to be design choice
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865
**[Test build #61146 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61146/consoleFull)**
for PR 13865 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13877
The new document in the screenshot looks pretty good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68352383
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68352349
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68352336
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68352322
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68352282
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68352258
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
**[Test build #61143 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61143/consoleFull)**
for PR 13701 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61143/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13877#discussion_r68352034
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -390,23 +376,41 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"KMeansModel"),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
**[Test build #61145 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61145/consoleFull)**
for PR 13844 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844
@mengxr Thanks for your review. Sent update for the style issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
**[Test build #61144 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61144/consoleFull)**
for PR 13881 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844#discussion_r68350637
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -232,7 +233,9 @@ object MinMaxScalerModel extends
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13881
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bomeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
ok, i will work on it based on comments. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13879
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13844#discussion_r68350339
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -232,7 +233,9 @@ object MinMaxScalerModel extends
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13879
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
**[Test build #61143 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61143/consoleFull)**
for PR 13701 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13874
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13874
LGTM - thanks! Merging to master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
ping @liancheng @yhuai again...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13874
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61141/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13874
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13874
**[Test build #61141 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61141/consoleFull)**
for PR 13874 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61140/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
**[Test build #61140 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61140/consoleFull)**
for PR 13699 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13130
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13130
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61142/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13130
**[Test build #61142 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61142/consoleFull)**
for PR 13130 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
ping @vlad17 @davies @liancheng Any thing else?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13130
**[Test build #61142 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61142/consoleFull)**
for PR 13130 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13130
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user Div333 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
Hello everyone, Thanks a lot for implementing the pivot functionality. I
have started using SparkR recently and would like to know if the pivot method
is included in the library as I don't find it
Github user JustinPihony commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601
Bump @HyukjinKwon I have some comments to your comments. Could you please
review them and I can push my changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13882
Please close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720#discussion_r68343766
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -522,7 +523,7 @@ case class DescribeTableCommand(table:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13882
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13865#discussion_r68343609
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +68,77 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest
GitHub user liu549676915 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13882
Branch 1.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
For the test, currently we only have one `desc table` test in
`HiveDDLSuite`, It will be good if we can have an individual test suite for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720#discussion_r68342801
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -522,7 +523,7 @@ case class DescribeTableCommand(table:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13874
**[Test build #61141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61141/consoleFull)**
for PR 13874 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61139/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13880
**[Test build #61139 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61139/consoleFull)**
for PR 13880 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
@kiszk we should definitely put zero into the corresponding field when set
null. It will be a little harder than `UnsafeRow`, as we need `setNullBoolean`,
`setNullInt`, etc. but it's still
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61138/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
Merging to master/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
**[Test build #61138 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61138/consoleFull)**
for PR 13832 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61137/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860
@hvanhovell Sure, will do it! It sounds like you also like the suggestion
by @cloud-fan . Let me do it too. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61137/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13837#discussion_r68341391
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetOptions.scala
---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ private[sql] class
1 - 100 of 475 matches
Mail list logo
