Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
**[Test build #61274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61274/consoleFull)**
for PR 13915 at commit
[`8be1263`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
[SPARK-16081] Disallow using `l` as variable name
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a ScalaStyle custom rule, `DisallowMisleadingVariableName`, by
usin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61272/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
**[Test build #61272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61272/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
[`83c9c5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #61273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61273/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
[`36cd826`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13885
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760#discussion_r68508656
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -243,17 +236,73 @@ setMethod("gapply",
signature(x = "GroupedData"),
function(x, func, schema)
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13885
LGTM. Thanks @felixcheung - Merging this into master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61271/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61271/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`3411fd6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13885
@shivaram this is ready, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Moved the prefered location and consumer creation strategies to an explicit
interface, let me know if that's more usable from your point of view.
Scala api looks like
KafkaUtils.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
**[Test build #61272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61272/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
[`83c9c5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r68506637
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameComplexTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.test.SharedS
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r68506607
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameComplexTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.test.SharedS
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r68506564
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -51,27 +51,52 @@ case class CreateArr
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r68506515
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -51,27 +51,52 @@ case class CreateArr
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912#discussion_r68506371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -195,18 +202,50 @@ private[sql] class CsvOu
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912#discussion_r68506352
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -195,18 +202,50 @@ private[sql] class CsvOu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61271/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`3411fd6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61270/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61270/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`efdd270`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61270/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`efdd270`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61269/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61269/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`dc5d585`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61267/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
**[Test build #61267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61267/consoleFull)**
for PR 13914 at commit
[`63ab73a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61269/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`dc5d585`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61266/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`9378764`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61266/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user krishnakalyan3 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
cc @holdenk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61268/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
**[Test build #61268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13910 at commit
[`1cfbea2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Hi, @mengxr .
Could you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914#discussion_r68502088
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -733,7 +734,8 @@ object Unidoc {
unidocSourceBase :=
s"https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v${versi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914#discussion_r68502066
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ object Unidoc {
// Skip class names containing $ and some internal packages in Javad
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
**[Test build #61268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13910 at commit
[`1cfbea2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
**[Test build #61267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61267/consoleFull)**
for PR 13914 at commit
[`63ab73a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
[SPARK-16111][DOC] Hide SparkOrcNewRecordReader in API docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR hides `SparkOrcNewRecordReader` from API docs.
## How
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61266/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`9378764`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13913
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13913
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61265/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13913
**[Test build #61265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61265/consoleFull)**
for PR 13913 at commit
[`834f515`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61264/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #61264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61264/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`681be95`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13913
Hi, @liancheng .
When I check
[SPARK-10591](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10591) today, it is
handled by `Row.equals` correctly.
I just make this PR for ensuring that for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61262/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13913
**[Test build #61265 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61265/consoleFull)**
for PR 13913 at commit
[`834f515`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
**[Test build #61262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61262/consoleFull)**
for PR 13911 at commit
[`333f7b6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13913
[SPARK-10591][TEST] Add a testcase to ensure if `checkAnswer` handles map
correctly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a testcase to ensure if `checkAns
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61263/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61263/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`3136ab5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61260/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
**[Test build #61260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61260/consoleFull)**
for PR 13906 at commit
[`bd39437`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #61264 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61264/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`681be95`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61263/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`3136ab5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
I see, maybe better to just fix the denominator then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user yanghaogn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
As explained in apache#2874
```
The max size of the input seq was Int.MaxValue - 1
```
This change may cause a bug. For the input is very big and It can be
treated as `not a problem
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
**[Test build #61262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61262/consoleFull)**
for PR 13911 at commit
[`333f7b6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
**[Test build #61261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61261/consoleFull)**
for PR 13910 at commit
[`f91e55e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Not quite, see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark and
other PRs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user yanghaogn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
@srowen It's been related now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
**[Test build #61261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61261/consoleFull)**
for PR 13910 at commit
[`f91e55e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13910
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61258/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
**[Test build #61258 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61258/consoleFull)**
for PR 13912 at commit
[`79a290a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
I suppose that if it's configurable, and not the default, then you're
letting people do what they want at least, including specify a format with a
timezone. I think it's virtually always asking for t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
**[Test build #61260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61260/consoleFull)**
for PR 13906 at commit
[`bd39437`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61255/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61255/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
[`c3016f3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13845
@JoshRosen Could you take a look by any change please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
**[Test build #61254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61254/consoleFull)**
for PR 13730 at commit
[`ba9a529`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Hm.. Anyway do you think I should close this and deal with JSON one? I
can't decide.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
I understand the problem without a timezone but.. hm.. to be honest, I have
seen a lot of cases of reading and writing times without a timezone (e.g. by
Microsoft Excel).
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61256/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
**[Test build #61256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61256/consoleFull)**
for PR 13911 at commit
[`b1f6289`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
@srowen How about leaving them as timestamps long values but write them as
formatted strings only when `dateFormat` is given?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
@rxin thank you for your comment. As you said, holistic view is important.
This PR is not only for machine learning.
This PR has another use case for improving projection of an array in any
p
101 - 197 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
