Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14057
**[Test build #61788 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61788/consoleFull)**
for PR 14057 at commit
[`3affa5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61793/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #61793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61793/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
[`a519540`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #61793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61793/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
[`a519540`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61785/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61782/
Test PASSed.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
**[Test build #61785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61785/consoleFull)**
for PR 13756 at commit
[`08b5374`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
**[Test build #61782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`cb6a2ec`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cb
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
**[Test build #61792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61792/consoleFull)**
for PR 13834 at commit
[`7b58a04`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
Jenkins retest this please (last failure was a hard JVM crash, obviously
not related)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
I had thought that closing the stream was sufficient (at least, that's the
current assumption in the code). But OK I can see making that change for a
slightly different reason, to make sure any fatal
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
> Do we have weird corner cases here like circular references?
That's a good question; the current code doesn't handle that (if you
reference a config that itself has references, those are no
Github user avulanov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868#discussion_r69644212
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -691,7 +692,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
My only concern is the added complexity vs how useful it would be. Do we
have weird corner cases here like circular references? or resolving references
among many sources in the right order leading t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61784/
Test FAILed.
---
I
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Randomly pinging a couple of people... @JoshRosen @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
**[Test build #61784 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61784/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`9170b3f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/91
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61780/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13951
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61778/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
**[Test build #61780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61780/consoleFull)**
for PR 14055 at commit
[`72ef9c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13951
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13951
**[Test build #61778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61778/consoleFull)**
for PR 13951 at commit
[`e6664ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
@KevinGrealish were you planning to add a unit test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
**[Test build #3162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3162/consoleFull)**
for PR 14041 at commit
[`2ea2b17`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
@srowen : I also changed the `NonFatal` to `Throwable` to account for your
comment at : https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834#issuecomment-230238421
The `proc` should always be terminated e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
Not sure what's up with that, but to be clear, I mean, isn't this just a
one-line change? `Utils.tryLogNonFatalError(outputStream.close())` there's no
need to modify anything else. This was the whole
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61791/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
[`b035865`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868#discussion_r69639163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -691,7 +692,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
C
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13957
**[Test build #61790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61790/consoleFull)**
for PR 13957 at commit
[`8f97b66`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61777/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13957
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13957
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61789/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13957
**[Test build #61789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61789/consoleFull)**
for PR 13957 at commit
[`893f70e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61777/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`6cef803`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13957
**[Test build #61789 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61789/consoleFull)**
for PR 13957 at commit
[`893f70e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61779/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61779/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
[`e497bd7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051#discussion_r69636913
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
def
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051#discussion_r69636858
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -517,16 +517,10 @@ private[spark] class MesosClus
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14057
**[Test build #61788 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61788/consoleFull)**
for PR 14057 at commit
[`3affa5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69635886
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14057
[SPARK-15425][SQL] Disallow cross joins, even if it is broadcast nested
loop - WIP
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WIP
## How was this patch tested?
WIP
You can
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69635495
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14056
Dang it, my fault. Yes that's the right change, sorry.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69635219
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -423,18 +432,35 @@ private[spark] cl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #61787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61787/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`0244f34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69634824
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -423,18 +432,35 @@ private[spark] cl
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
yeah. @zsxwing is looking into it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69633021
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61783/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
**[Test build #61783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61783/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
[`0d7defa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69632635
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61771/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981#discussion_r69631781
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +97,25 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14056
**[Test build #61786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61786/consoleFull)**
for PR 14056 at commit
[`5dc29f0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
**[Test build #61771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61771/consoleFull)**
for PR 13886 at commit
[`e4cc35d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14056
[SPARK-16385][core] Catch correct exception when calling method via râ¦
Using "Method.invoke" causes an exception to be thrown, not an error, so
Utils.waitForProcess() was always throwing an exc
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69630404
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #3163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3163/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
[`a519540`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
Thank you, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #3163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3163/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
[`a519540`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
**[Test build #61785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61785/consoleFull)**
for PR 13756 at commit
[`08b5374`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61769/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`7ed75b4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
> I have a few questions.
>
> Is it a regression from 1.6? Looks like not?
I don't know about 1.6. I know it's a regression from 1.5.
> Is it a correctness issue or a perfor
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
@mallman never mind.
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5b7a1770ac9cf36a1e92b31d10fe692fef17
fixed the issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
@zsxwing I was able to do following without error:
git clone g...@github.com:apache/spark.git spark-master
cd spark-master
./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.10
./bui
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
**[Test build #61784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61784/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`9170b3f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/917
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61781/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #61781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61781/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`0244f34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #61781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61781/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`0244f34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
**[Test build #61782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`cb6a2ec`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cb6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
**[Test build #61783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61783/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
[`0d7defa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61767/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61770/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #61767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61767/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
[`ca74f9a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
**[Test build #61770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61770/consoleFull)**
for PR 13756 at commit
[`08b5374`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
**[Test build #61780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61780/consoleFull)**
for PR 14055 at commit
[`72ef9c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14055
[SPARK-16383][SQL] Remove `SessionState.executeSql`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes `SessionState.executeSql` in favor of `SparkSession.sql`.
We c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61779/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
[`e497bd7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
301 - 400 of 657 matches
Mail list logo
