GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14127
[SPARK-15467][build] update janino version to 3.0.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR updates version of Janino compiler from 2.7.8 to 3.0.0. This
version fixes
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
@srowen yeah i agree with you its same like non async actions but yeah we
should list it because its more useful in real life application when single
application running multiple jobs of different
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
@srowen yeah you are right its not blocking calling thread but they execute
sequentially right but in async action its return future so its running on
different threads soo not run sequentially soo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62058/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #62058 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62058/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
@cloud-fan could you please review this? As you pointed, I also changed
code related to `cast`. I added benchmark results, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14081
Thanks for the review Sean!
On Jul 10, 2016 4:29 AM, "Sean Owen" wrote:
> I'm going to merge this to master only if nobody has further comments.
>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #62059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62059/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62057/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62057/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
yea, so whatever the data type is(python udt or normal sql type), at java
side there is no difference, the data is converted to corrected format by
pickler. That's why I think maybe it's possible
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
LGTM except some style comments, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70183976
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -31,4 +33,46 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70183958
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,20 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70183882
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -31,4 +33,46 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70183835
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -660,18 +660,51 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #62058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62058/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
```
val rdd = spark.sparkContext.makeRDD(Seq("{\"a\" : 1}", "{\"a\" : null}"))
val schema = StructType(StructField("a", IntegerType, nullable = false) ::
Nil)
val df =
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70183276
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r70183088
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -1493,7 +1495,62 @@ def test_infer_schema(self):
self.assertTrue(m, self.sm1)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62056/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
**[Test build #62056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62056/consoleFull)**
for PR 14111 at commit
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r70183009
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r70183002
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r70182998
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r70182979
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r70182969
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62057/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
@HyukjinKwon hi. The explanation above intends to help reviewers better
understand how we introduced the regression. Regarding whether `StringType`
should be ignored or not, I don't have strong
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118#discussion_r70182426
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -238,59 +238,55 @@ private[csv] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62054/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
**[Test build #62054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62054/consoleFull)**
for PR 14124 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
**[Test build #62056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62056/consoleFull)**
for PR 14111 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14122#discussion_r70181416
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -327,6 +327,11 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62055/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14122
**[Test build #62055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62055/consoleFull)**
for PR 14122 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068
LGTM, just a minor nit! Thanks for this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068#discussion_r70181303
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -426,16 +426,19 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068#discussion_r70181291
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -426,16 +426,19 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14122
**[Test build #62055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62055/consoleFull)**
for PR 14122 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Oh, I mean they should be serialized/deserialized by pickler.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
**[Test build #62054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62054/consoleFull)**
for PR 14124 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62053/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
**[Test build #62053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62053/consoleFull)**
for PR 14124 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14122#discussion_r70180443
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -327,6 +327,11 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068
LGTM but CC @brkyvz
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104#discussion_r70180403
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1099,6 +1099,34 @@ for details.
+ Asynchronous Actions
+Spark provide asynchronous
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Mostly this just duplicates the non-async documentation. I think it's worth
mentioning the existence of the async methods with a pointer to the API docs,
but, I don't think this table adds value.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104#discussion_r70180404
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1099,6 +1099,34 @@ for details.
+ Asynchronous Actions
+Spark provide asynchronous
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14054
I'm going to merge this to `master` only if I don't hear back soon. however
if anyone feels moderately strongly about adding a config param I can do that.
It could even be done later.
---
If your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14081
I'm going to merge this to master only if nobody has further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14097#discussion_r70180299
--- Diff: docs/streaming-kinesis-integration.md ---
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Here we explain how to configure Spark Streaming to receive
data from Kinesis.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14115#discussion_r70180202
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user ystop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14126
l want delete it. how can l do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ystop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14126
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14126
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user ystop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14126
123update
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14086
Hm, it seems like it should be another `SaveMode` if anything. Its
semantics would be identical to `Overwrite`, I guess, for other non-JDBC
sources. CC @yhuai ?
However... is it not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62052/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
**[Test build #62052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62052/consoleFull)**
for PR 14013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
**[Test build #62053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62053/consoleFull)**
for PR 14124 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62051/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14121
OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #62051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62051/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14125
There's enough wrong with this PR that you need to close it, then read
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14125
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user tianxuan911 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14125
New Feature!
Configure file named slaves in directory conf support ssh param custom!
Before this commit,only username and ip.Such as
locahost
name@localhost
After,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62050/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62050/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62049/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
**[Test build #62049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62049/consoleFull)**
for PR 14124 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62048/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #62048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62048/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14123
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62047/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14123
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70178966
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14123
**[Test build #62047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62047/consoleFull)**
for PR 14123 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Can you point out where we catch `PythonUserDefinedType` and do special
serialization at java side? It looks to me that we just get its corresponding
sql type.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62045/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
**[Test build #62045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62045/consoleFull)**
for PR 14113 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62046/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
**[Test build #62046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62046/consoleFull)**
for PR 14113 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14013
**[Test build #62052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62052/consoleFull)**
for PR 14013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
**[Test build #62051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62051/consoleFull)**
for PR 14014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62050/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
also cc @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
201 - 300 of 320 matches
Mail list logo