Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
@dongjoon-hyun Do you mind if I ask a question please?
It seems it works in MySQL supports `UNION ALL` for the compatible types,
for example, numeric compatible types. If my
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62849/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
**[Test build #62849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62849/consoleFull)**
for PR 14354 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
this this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62847/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62847 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62847/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62846/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
**[Test build #62846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62846/consoleFull)**
for PR 13620 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36
**[Test build #66 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/66/consoleFull)**
for PR 36 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36
**[Test build #66 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/66/consoleFull)**
for PR 36 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
**[Test build #62850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62850/consoleFull)**
for PR 14355 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Now that 2.0 is in the final RC would maybe @davies have a chance to take a
look and see if this is something that would be interesting?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
[SPARK-16726][SQL] Improve error message for `Union` queries for
incompatible types
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `UNION` queries on incompatible
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62843/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #62843 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62843/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user zasdfgbnm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14231#discussion_r72167441
--- Diff: bin/spark-class ---
@@ -65,24 +65,25 @@ fi
# characters that would be otherwise interpreted by the shell. Read that
in a while loop,
Github user zasdfgbnm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14231#discussion_r72167136
--- Diff: bin/spark-class ---
@@ -65,24 +65,25 @@ fi
# characters that would be otherwise interpreted by the shell. Read that
in a while loop,
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Thanks a lot @JoshRosen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
This is an example of this leak:
http://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.2/1429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
**[Test build #62849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62849/consoleFull)**
for PR 14354 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354#discussion_r72163631
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -819,10 +819,13 @@ class StreamingContextSuite extends
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
[SPARK-16722][Tests]Fix a StreamingContext leak in StreamingContextSuite
when eventually fails
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR moves `ssc.stop()` into
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
LGTM (from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62842/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
**[Test build #62842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62842/consoleFull)**
for PR 14269 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
Tests have passed. Merging this to master and 2.0. Thanks for reviewing
@zsxwing @jaceklaskowski
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r72160752
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
**[Test build #62848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62848/consoleFull)**
for PR 14353 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
/cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r72160650
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -97,6 +97,49 @@ package object config {
.toSequence
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r72160497
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -204,6 +213,7 @@ case object TaskResultLost extends TaskFailedReason {
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
[SPARK-16714][SQL] `array` should create a decimal array from decimals with
different precisions and scales
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.0, we will
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
**[Test build #3190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14292 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62838/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
**[Test build #62838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62838/consoleFull)**
for PR 14350 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62847/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62839/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
**[Test build #62839 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62839/consoleFull)**
for PR 14349 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
@srowen
The sparkContext, by default, will running a cleaner to release not
referenced RDD/broadcasts on background. But, I think, we'd better to release
them by ourselves because the
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
@chenghao-intel Will you have time to update this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14352
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user nwbvt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14352
Fix description of spark.speculation.quantile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Minor doc fix regarding the spark.speculation.quantile configuration
parameter. It
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62844/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62845/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62845/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
**[Test build #62844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62844/consoleFull)**
for PR 14351 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
**[Test build #62846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62846/consoleFull)**
for PR 13620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62837/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
**[Test build #62837 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62837/consoleFull)**
for PR 13920 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
LGTM. Let's run the test again since this is a pretty old PR. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62845/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241#discussion_r72154191
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -275,62 +271,152 @@ private[sql] case class RowDataSourceScanExec(
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241#discussion_r72154195
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -275,62 +271,152 @@ private[sql] case class RowDataSourceScanExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62836/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
**[Test build #62836 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62836/consoleFull)**
for PR 14174 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
**[Test build #62844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62844/consoleFull)**
for PR 14351 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
@rxin could you check this before the v2.0 release?
An actual default seems to be `snappy`:
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
[SQL][DOC] Fix a default name for parquet compression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to fix a wrong description for parquet default compression.
You can
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Now that 2.0 is mostly ready to go out (with the new accumulator API) -
does maybe @squito have some cycles to look at this? I know @rxin is probably
pretty busy with the packaging but after 2.0 is
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14311
Weird, both `core/test-only *DistributedSuite*` and `repl/test-only
*ReplSuite*` pass locally for me (jdk-8). I'll look into it tomorrow when I
have access to my desktop.
---
If your project is set
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
Now that 2.0 is mostly out - does @dbtsai have some cycles to review it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Now that 2.0 RC5 has passed - maybe it would be an OK time to revisit this?
I think it can also be an ok base for adding more formats if we need to.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #62843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62843/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72148282
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -247,6 +248,46 @@ private[sql] trait SQLTestUtils
}
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72148009
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -269,19 +273,11 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
**[Test build #62842 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62842/consoleFull)**
for PR 14269 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284#discussion_r72144974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WindowExec.scala ---
@@ -625,10 +643,12 @@ private[execution] final class
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
Removed unused import.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
one minor issue with import otherwise changes LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62841 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269#discussion_r72143443
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.internal
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62841 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
**[Test build #3190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14292 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62840 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
201 - 300 of 699 matches
Mail list logo
