Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14682#discussion_r75483271
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/LogicalRelation.scala
---
@@ -79,11 +79,18 @@ case class LogicalRelation(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64069/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
**[Test build #64069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64069/consoleFull)**
for PR 14717 at commit
[`06c2147`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75481689
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -33,7 +34,7 @@ import
org.apache.spark.sql.cata
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
**[Test build #64068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64068/consoleFull)**
for PR 14717 at commit
[`396ba1d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64068/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
**[Test build #64068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64068/consoleFull)**
for PR 14717 at commit
[`396ba1d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
GitHub user hqzizania opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717
[SPARK-17090][ML]Make tree aggregation level in linear/logistic regression
configurable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Linear/logistic regression use treeAggregate w
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75480152
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +90,30 @@ case class AnalyzeTableCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75479677
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -99,9 +99,7 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14709
**[Test build #64067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64067/consoleFull)**
for PR 14709 at commit
[`442918f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14709
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14124
**[Test build #64066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64066/consoleFull)**
for PR 14124 at commit
[`079aae2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
thanks, merging to master/2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14707
LGTM, but let's wait for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155 to
avoid conflict, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14697#discussion_r75477964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -143,7 +143,9 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset protected[sql]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
**[Test build #64065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64065/consoleFull)**
for PR 14279 at commit
[`405e723`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64063/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
**[Test build #64063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64063/consoleFull)**
for PR 14660 at commit
[`1297a91`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #64064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64064/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
[`26fa2e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64064/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64061/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
**[Test build #64061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64061/consoleFull)**
for PR 14279 at commit
[`7e61674`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64062/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
**[Test build #64062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64062/consoleFull)**
for PR 14038 at commit
[`60f05ad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #64064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64064/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
[`26fa2e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64059/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
**[Test build #64059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64059/consoleFull)**
for PR 14555 at commit
[`b291423`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #64060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64060/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
[`ceb5050`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64060/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
(@rxin cc you in case you just missed this)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
**[Test build #64063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64063/consoleFull)**
for PR 14660 at commit
[`1297a91`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64058/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #64058 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64058/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
[`6ca8909`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660#discussion_r75464633
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -243,6 +243,14 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
**[Test build #64062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64062/consoleFull)**
for PR 14038 at commit
[`60f05ad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
**[Test build #64061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64061/consoleFull)**
for PR 14279 at commit
[`7e61674`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12790
@MLnick Thanks for clarification. Then I think current fix is OK, since
Scala is strongly typed, we can regard ```Array()``` or ```Array.empty``` as
wrong input and throw exception. It's not nece
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14382
I see, I tend to trust your work here. The result looks OK. Looks like this
only needs to go to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12790
Actually the behavior in Scala is consistent - passing in `Array()` or
`Array.empty()` you are passing in `Array[Nothing]` so that is why there is a
`ClassCastException`.
Passing in an empty
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #64060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64060/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
[`ceb5050`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
**[Test build #64059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64059/consoleFull)**
for PR 14555 at commit
[`b291423`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14663
Another one where I'd welcome comments from ... @holdenk @MLnick @davies et
al
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14716
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14711
You can just merge the work over to the other PR. I think we want to fix
latex that's rendering as code accidentally, and latex whose closing braces are
mangled by scaladoc.
---
If your project is
Github user jagadeesanas2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14711
ohh i got it. Can i close this PR..?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14716
Merged into master. Thanks for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14181
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14711
I'm referring to your PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14688 I
don't see that he said he's working on it, just that he encountered it while
working on something else. I'd rather fix the mathj
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14181
@viirya Ah, I noticed this issue has already been fixed in your pr
#14327(SPARK-16686).
So, I'll close this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14666
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64055/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14666
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14666
**[Test build #64055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64055/consoleFull)**
for PR 14666 at commit
[`54fe8a9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jagadeesanas2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14711
@srowen , Actually this fix (mathjax issues) for this JIRA only. As @sethah
mentioned in his comment, he is working on `SPARK-17095`, he will send PR soon.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14181
@viirya I noticed this issues was resolved in SPARK-16686(#14327).
So, I'll close this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14716
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Oh, wait, I think I can handle this. Please ignore the comments I just
left. Sorry for noise.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64057/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14716
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14716
**[Test build #64057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64057/consoleFull)**
for PR 14716 at commit
[`19cb3ad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64053/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
**[Test build #64053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64053/consoleFull)**
for PR 14713 at commit
[`82935a7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Sigh.. I will proceed but please let me note that this will also bring a
breaking change for reading as well not only writing..
It seems there is a backwards compatibility problem with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14709
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14709
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64054/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14709
**[Test build #64054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64054/consoleFull)**
for PR 14709 at commit
[`442918f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14682#discussion_r75452031
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/LogicalRelation.scala
---
@@ -79,11 +79,18 @@ case class LogicalRelation(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75451232
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(c
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75451088
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(c
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75451038
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -189,11 +228,35 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
*/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643
Thresholds are just that -- thresholds. The meaning is certainly as in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643#discussion_r75290480 While I kind
of like the idea of also treating them as a 'weigh
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #64058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64058/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
[`6ca8909`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75450667
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -584,13 +579,8 @@ case class AlterTableSetLocationCommand(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Yup, thanks for informing me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75450024
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14711
I'm confused, isn't this related to SPARK-17095? you're already fixing
mathjax issues there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user kekdke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14686
yes ï¼i have try it ,but the error is still
"execution.ScriptTransformationWriterThread: /bin/bash: test1.py: command not
found"
could i add your QQ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14715
That sounds correct given
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/5545b791096756b07b3207fb3de13b68b9a37b00/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationChecker.s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
**[Test build #3227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3227/consoleFull)**
for PR 14712 at commit
[`4375e76`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14181#discussion_r75448687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -148,6 +148,21 @@ class SimpleTestOptimizer extends Opti
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64050/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14713
**[Test build #64050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64050/consoleFull)**
for PR 14713 at commit
[`9be428a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
501 - 600 of 691 matches
Mail list logo
