Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64299/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #64309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64309/consoleFull)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64306/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
**[Test build #64306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64306/consoleFull)**
for PR 14725 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r75944093
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -644,13 +644,39 @@ methods for creating DStreams from files as input
sources.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r75944182
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -196,29 +192,33 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
**[Test build #64308 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64308/consoleFull)**
for PR 14768 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14772
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14772
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14770
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14775
**[Test build #64307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64307/consoleFull)**
for PR 14775 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64307/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14775
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14770
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
**[Test build #64295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64295/consoleFull)**
for PR 14763 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Good for you! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Thanks @dongjoon-hyun for the pointer; I've regenerated the answer set and
all tests are now passing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64295/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r75939624
--- Diff: mesos/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14775
cc @felixcheung @olarayej
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14775
**[Test build #64307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64307/consoleFull)**
for PR 14775 at commit
GitHub user shivaram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14775
[SPARK-16581][SPARKR] Make JVM backend calling functions public
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change exposes a public API in SparkR to create objects, call
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64305/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
**[Test build #64305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64305/consoleFull)**
for PR 14725 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
**[Test build #64306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64306/consoleFull)**
for PR 14725 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
@deepakmk9 For now, you need to rename the field. As long as it is not
called `element`, it should work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
**[Test build #64305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64305/consoleFull)**
for PR 14725 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64296/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #64296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64296/consoleFull)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Thanks @holdenk. I have an example usage for primitive arrays in the PR
description, let me know if that is not clear enough to show how this change
useful. I also added usage for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64304/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
**[Test build #64304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64304/consoleFull)**
for PR 14725 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
**[Test build #64304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64304/consoleFull)**
for PR 14725 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r75930641
--- Diff: mesos/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
@rxin there's no top-level package being created anymore (after the
remaining test code is moved).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r75929868
--- Diff: mesos/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14741
The value of `what` shouldn't change if we are retrying the read. If it was
`integer` it should remain `integer`. There is a corner case of what happens if
we say read the first byte of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64303/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Can we avoid creating another top level package? We have a lot of those
already. Perhaps just put it into one of the existing one. (network.crypto or
storage.crypto).
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64302/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64302/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r75927255
--- Diff: mesos/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64302/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r75926093
--- Diff: mesos/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64301/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64301/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64301/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64297/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
**[Test build #64297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64297/consoleFull)**
for PR 14613 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64293/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64293/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
@srowen Thanks for the review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14774
**[Test build #64300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64300/consoleFull)**
for PR 14774 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
I probably need some oversight here since I'm not familiar with pyspark in
this regard, but it looks like PythonMLLibAPI treated seeds a little
differently in a few cases which meant they couldn't
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Yes to all three of those.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14774
[SparkR][BUILD]:ignore cran-check.out under R folder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
R add cran check which will
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
merged to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
I did test locally this time, thanks Felix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
btw, this has info on document generation so you could test this out
locally:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/R/DOCUMENTATION.md
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64299/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761#discussion_r75921988
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -550,3 +532,27 @@ processSparkPackages <- function(packages) {
}
splittedPackages
}
+
+#
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
@srowen OK, added the profile to:
- .travis.yml
- release-build.sh
- lint-java
- mima
- scalastyle
What about dev/test-dependencies.sh.
Also, I added mesos to
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761#discussion_r75921626
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -550,3 +532,27 @@ processSparkPackages <- function(packages) {
}
splittedPackages
}
+
+#
Github user deepakmk9 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14014
IS there any way to make this work in Spark 1.6.2 , I ma facing the same
issue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Just to clarify what we are talking about on the Python side, pyspark-mllib
given `seed=None` will generate a random seed based on system time, while
pyspark-ml given `seed=None` will use a
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
1. updated the code to bypass the glob routine when there is no wildcard;
this bypasses something fairly inefficient.
1. reporting FNFE on that base dir differently; skip the stack trace
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64298/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #64298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64298/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
@felixcheung, Any comments on the new change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
@felixcheung I changed the tests according to your comments. For the
`specialtypeshandle`, it should return the key in `PRIMITIVE_TYPES` based on
the original backend return type. In the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #64298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64298/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
**[Test build #64297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64297/consoleFull)**
for PR 14613 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #64296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64296/consoleFull)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user krishnakalyan3 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14741
@shivaram @davies
- Signature of the readBin function is `readBin(con, what, n,
as.integer(size), endian)`
What should the value of `what` be when an the process is interrupted
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
**[Test build #64295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64295/consoleFull)**
for PR 14763 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64294/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64294/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64294/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
The first one seems fine to me. LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64293/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Some small things left to take care of, otherwise looking good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
For this piece of code:
I think lines in` if `and `else` blocks should be at
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r75913749
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/crypto/ShuffleEncryptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r75913315
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/SerializerManager.scala ---
@@ -143,7 +179,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
LGTM. Since I mostly work on scala part, wait for other vote. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
201 - 300 of 525 matches
Mail list logo
