GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15063
[SPARK-17463][Core]Make CollectionAccumulator and SetAccumulator's value
can be read thread-safely
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make CollectionAccumulator and
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78420053
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -460,33 +577,74 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13762
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13762
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65256/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78419383
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -311,8 +350,28 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13762
**[Test build #65256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65256/consoleFull)**
for PR 13762 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15061#discussion_r78419280
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -787,9 +792,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14992
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
**[Test build #65261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65261/consoleFull)**
for PR 14969 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65262/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #65262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65262/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78417431
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -538,6 +539,71 @@ public SparkAppHandle
GitHub user rdblue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15062
SPARK-17424: Fix unsound substitution bug in ScalaReflection.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This method gets a type's primary constructor and fills in type parameters
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65253/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #65253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65253/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15061#discussion_r78415480
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -787,9 +792,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15061
[SPARK-14818] Post-2.0 MiMa exclucsion and build changes
This patch makes a handful of post-Spark-2.0 MiMa exclusion and build
updates. It should be merged to master and a subset of it should be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65263/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
**[Test build #65263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65263/consoleFull)**
for PR 14678 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wgtmac commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15035
@JoshRosen yes it may have mask overflow risk. This conversion happens when
user provided schema or hive metastore schema has Long but the parquet files
have Int as the schema. We cannot avoid this
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10655
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user wgtmac commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15035
@HyukjinKwon This is not parquet specific, it applies to other data sources
as well.
1. Change the reading path for parquet: It does not solve the problem. Some
queries need to read all parquet
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
Oh I see. Yes if we can move it to Spark's core test module that would be
nicer.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
but relTol is defined in mllib and sql not reference it, seems better to
move it to spark-core project?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #65260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65260/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65260/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060
Is there any other arg checking we can tighten up here? There are a couple
places were weights need to match something else in size.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060#discussion_r78409055
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -545,7 +553,9 @@ private[ann] object FeedForwardModel {
* @return model
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060#discussion_r78408999
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -395,6 +395,14 @@ private[ann] class FeedForwardTopology private(val
layers:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65258/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #65258 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65258/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060
[SPARK-17507][ML][MLLib] check weight vector size in ANN
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
as the TODO described,
check weight vector size and if wrong throw
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15000
Ah right dumb question. Yeah I think it makes some sense ... maybe not even
for Java because there are lots of methods we don't plumb through because you
can easily access them directly rom scala.
Github user apetresc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15000
PySpark. I don't think anyone runs Java through Jupyter, haha.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15000
Is this Java or Pyspark? In Java you can still get this property directly
from the underlying SparkContext.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user apetresc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15000
Well, here's the use case I want it for: I'm building some plugins for
JupyterHub to make it more Spark-aware, and I want to be able to link the user
out to the right WebUI for their kernel. Short
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r78406032
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,8 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15058
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65255/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15058
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15058
**[Test build #65255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65255/consoleFull)**
for PR 15058 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15040
@cloud-fan : Would it be ok to add a field in CatalogTable to indicate if a
table is from Hive ? For Hive tables, the hashing function also needs to be
different while doing bucketing so having
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
It would also be nice to have unit tests for this. I see there are unit
tests for launch but not startApplication, but I"m not sure why.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65257/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78400990
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -538,6 +539,71 @@ public SparkAppHandle
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65257/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65259/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65259/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78400270
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -538,6 +539,71 @@ public SparkAppHandle
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
We already have a 'relTol' operator for this purpose BTW.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
[SPARK-17506][SQL] Improve the check double values equality rule.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ExpressionEvalHelper`, we check the equality between two
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
do all the options work in thread mode and client mode? For instance there
were some things add in 2.x like redirectOutput and redirecterror that do
processbuilder stuff and I assume don't work
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14917
@hvanhovell Could you review this PR when you have some time please? Thank
you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
@debasish83 any chance to take a look yet?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user a-roberts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14961
No new test failures with my runs ranging from Hadoop 2.3 to Hadoop 2.7
today so pushed the commit above
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912
Thanks, @gatorsmile, for mentioning me. I will try my best to comment on
this thread. Disclaimer: I have not looked at the existing code manipulating
predicates/expressions in Spark. Nor have I the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #65262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65262/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15057
**[Test build #65254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65254/consoleFull)**
for PR 15057 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
**[Test build #65261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65261/consoleFull)**
for PR 14969 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65259 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65259/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15058
**[Test build #65255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65255/consoleFull)**
for PR 15058 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #65260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65260/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #65253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65253/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
**[Test build #65263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65263/consoleFull)**
for PR 14678 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #65258 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65258/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13762
**[Test build #65256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65256/consoleFull)**
for PR 13762 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65257/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78389388
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -311,8 +350,28 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r7839
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -460,33 +577,74 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78388796
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitRunner.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78387851
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -73,6 +74,21 @@
/** Logger name to use when launching a child
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78387176
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -73,6 +74,21 @@
/** Logger name to use when launching a child
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78387149
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -73,6 +74,21 @@
/** Logger name to use when launching a child
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78386962
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -73,6 +74,21 @@
/** Logger name to use when launching a child
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78385859
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -73,6 +74,21 @@
/** Logger name to use when launching a child
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78385134
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -73,6 +74,21 @@
/** Logger name to use when launching a child
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78384231
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ private[spark] class Client(
private val
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78384350
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ public SparkAppHandle
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
we should update javadoc for package in
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/package-info.java
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379941
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -144,7 +149,11 @@ private[spark] class Client(
def
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379574
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitRunner.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379526
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitRunner.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379457
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitRunner.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379337
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitRunner.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379290
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -613,4 +679,6 @@ protected void handleExtraArgs(List extra) {
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78379144
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -538,6 +539,71 @@ public SparkAppHandle
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78378891
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -538,6 +539,71 @@ public SparkAppHandle
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78378090
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/LauncherServer.java ---
@@ -157,9 +177,15 @@ public void run() {
* Creates a new app
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r78377198
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/launcher/LauncherBackend.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +104,9 @@ private[spark] abstract class LauncherBackend {
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
Thanks @MLnick. What would you suggest with the PR then (after the comments
from @sethah)? Please guide.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
by the way multi-class LR will be in 2.1 not 2.0.1, so we do have some time
to wait for #14834
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14949 -- I think we might want to
proceed with this with some modifications.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
301 - 400 of 559 matches
Mail list logo
