Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #65993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65993/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80795551
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApiRootResource.scala ---
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ private[spark] object ApiRootResource {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #66001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66001/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168#discussion_r80794752
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+CREATE TABLE t (a STRING, b INT) PARTITIONED BY (c
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238#discussion_r80794658
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -191,25 +191,34 @@ object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238#discussion_r80794597
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -579,8 +579,13 @@ object InferFiltersFromConstraints
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80793355
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaConsumer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168#discussion_r80792407
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+CREATE TABLE t (a STRING, b INT) PARTITIONED BY (c STRING, d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15265
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15265
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65991/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65989/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15265
**[Test build #65991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65991/consoleFull)**
for PR 15265 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #65989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65989/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user wgtmac commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80791402
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApiRootResource.scala ---
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ private[spark] object ApiRootResource {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238
Currently, both negative and positive cases are combined in the same test
case. Could you split them? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238
@viirya Could you add one more test case?
```
query1
|
U - D - U - query2
|
D - U - query3
|
query4
```
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
**[Test build #66000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66000/consoleFull)**
for PR 15208 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238#discussion_r80788735
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/SetOperationSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,4 +77,32 @@ class SetOperationSuite
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15268
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65992/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238#discussion_r80787675
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/SetOperationSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,4 +77,32 @@ class SetOperationSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
**[Test build #65992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65992/consoleFull)**
for PR 15208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
**[Test build #65999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65999/consoleFull)**
for PR 14642 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
This looks correct to me. Let me retest and then I'll merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15238#discussion_r80784941
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -191,25 +191,34 @@ object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80783291
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -178,6 +178,23 @@ class HistoryServer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #65988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65988/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80780845
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApiRootResource.scala ---
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ private[spark] object ApiRootResource {
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80780569
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -178,6 +178,23 @@ class HistoryServer(
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80779108
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -178,6 +178,23 @@ class HistoryServer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65988/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15268
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15268
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65995/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15268
**[Test build #65995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65995/consoleFull)**
for PR 15268 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
@vanzin woudl appreciate it if you can take a look at this -- related to
the change you reviewed back here
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5886#issuecomment-99941529
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
**[Test build #65998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65998/consoleFull)**
for PR 15269 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65998/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
**[Test build #65998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65998/consoleFull)**
for PR 15269 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65996/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
**[Test build #65996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65996/consoleFull)**
for PR 15269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
**[Test build #65997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65997/consoleFull)**
for PR 15250 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
**[Test build #65996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65996/consoleFull)**
for PR 15269 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
[WIP][TEST] Experiment with running Scoverage in tests
WIP to test Scoverage integration in AMPLab Jenkins.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65987/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
**[Test build #65987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65987/consoleFull)**
for PR 15252 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15268
**[Test build #65995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65995/consoleFull)**
for PR 15268 at commit
GitHub user ajbozarth opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15268
[SPARK-17598] [SQL] [Web UI] User-friendly name for Spark Thrift Server in
web UI
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The name of Spark Thrift JDBC/ODBC Server in web UI
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14719
@sarutak, my apologies if this will upset you. I'd like to propose an
alternative solution to the problems documented in SPARK-13801, 14040, 17337
and, here, 17154. The solution borrows the idea from
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #65994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65994/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65986/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
**[Test build #65986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65986/consoleFull)**
for PR 15249 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Now, the PR description is also up-to-date.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168#discussion_r80771190
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -276,13 +276,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf:
Github user nsyca closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14899
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14899
I am closing this PR. I will propose a general solution in SPARK-17154.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user ashwinshankar77 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
[SPARK-17667] [YARN][WIP]Make locking fine grained in
YarnAllocator#enqueueGetLossReasonRequest
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Following up on the discussion in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
**[Test build #65992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65992/consoleFull)**
for PR 15208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #65993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65993/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15265
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208#discussion_r80767167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -65,7 +65,10 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15266
**[Test build #65990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65990/consoleFull)**
for PR 15266 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15265
**[Test build #65991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65991/consoleFull)**
for PR 15265 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15266
[SPARK-17693] [SQL] Fixed Insert Failure To Data Source Tables when the
Schema has the Comment Field
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```SQL
CREATE TABLE tab1(col1
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168#discussion_r80763632
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -276,13 +276,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf:
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15265
[SPARK-17618] Guard against invalid comparisons between UnsafeRow and other
formats
This patch ports changes from #15185 to Spark 2.x. In that patch, a
correctness bug in Spark 1.6.x which was
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80763362
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #65989 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65989/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80761163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168#discussion_r80759513
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -276,13 +276,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user JoshRosen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15185
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
**[Test build #65988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65988/consoleFull)**
for PR 15168 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
+1 on @lins05's suggestion of going further and removing any
non-unnecessary explicit usages of `ListConverter`; we might as well clean up
all of this in one shot, if possible.
---
If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Never mind~. Thank you for coming back! I'll check the PR description again
and make up-to-date.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15264
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
@dongjoon-hyun sorry about that. Is the PR description (including all the
exceptions) up to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user wgtmac opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15264
[SPARK-17477][SQL] SparkSQL cannot handle schema evolution from Int -> Long
when parquet files have Int as its type while hive metastore has Long as its
type
## What changes were proposed in this
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208#discussion_r80758062
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -65,7 +65,10 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65984/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
**[Test build #65984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65984/consoleFull)**
for PR 14623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65985/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80755706
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -693,6 +701,7 @@ object HiveExternalCatalog {
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #65985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65985/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15185
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Oh, conflicts occurs due to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15234 .
I'll resolve this soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15234
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
We can add an option to allow the user failing the query instead of just
logging the warning.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
201 - 300 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
