Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66065/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66065/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`8f04ee8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66053/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #66053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66053/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
[`1d3dd62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15264
@HyukjinKwon thanks for taking a look at the previous patch. I suggested
this fix to @wgtmac offline but perhaps I didn't quite understand the
"old"/"new" file issue that you mentioned. Can yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66064/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`07b78a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66065/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`8f04ee8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user wgtmac commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r81027833
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -179,7 +180,11 @@ class HistoryServer(
}
--- End diff --
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66063/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`d81d9d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
**[Test build #66052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66052/consoleFull)**
for PR 15274 at commit
[`360b97b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15270
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66062/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`a07ff90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66061/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66061/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`f805658`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66061/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`f805658`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15284
**[Test build #66060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66060/consoleFull)**
for PR 15284 at commit
[`a3dce9f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15284#discussion_r81025673
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ case class RepeatedData(
GitHub user jodersky opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15284
[SPARK-17368] [SQL] Add support for value class serialization and
deserialization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Value classes were unsupported because catalyst data types
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66052/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Different from `CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW`, the view created by `CREATE GLOBAL
TEMPORARY VIEW` is not allowed to insert. Could you add a test case for it?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
**[Test build #66059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66059/consoleFull)**
for PR 15247 at commit
[`67ea2de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
its there to make sure everyone is using the same classloader and to handle
if it they are chained. I'm not really familiar with all the scenarios of the
repl. I see the Suite itself is getting t
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81024744
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -421,7 +412,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
ma
Github user Parth-Brahmbhatt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14720
Ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15270
@vanzin Merged. Could you close this PR, please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
We probably do, would be good to double check we have at least a test for
each.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66047/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
@tgravescs @srowen Thanks. Using `Class.forName` which uses
`this.getClass().getClassLoader()` by default makes all the tests passed (both
sbt and maven). However there must be some reason we pref
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
**[Test build #66047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66047/consoleFull)**
for PR 15102 at commit
[`9d95d52`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user wgtmac reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
[SPARK-17672] Spark 2.0 history server web Ui takes too long for a single
application
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a new API getApplicationInfo(appId: String)
Github user wgtmac closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15270
Okey. I'm going to merge it. We can change it in another PR on master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user wgtmac commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Anyone knows why the last test failed in the sql module? My change has
nothing to do with it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81022074
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -266,19 +263,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
tas
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15270#discussion_r81021249
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ private[spark] class CoarseGrainedExecutorBa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66050/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
**[Test build #66050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66050/consoleFull)**
for PR 15247 at commit
[`67ea2de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81020674
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15283
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81020284
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
GitHub user stephvelazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15283
[README] Edits syntax throughout ReadMe for better clarity/flow
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Grammatical edit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15270
LGTM except a nit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15270#discussion_r81019238
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ private[spark] class CoarseGrainedExecutorB
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81018983
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -50,22 +48,12 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{AccumulatorV2, Clock,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66055/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66055/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`b79ebbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
`SHOW DATABASES` does not output the database name. I am wondering how
users can quickly find the global temporary database name?
```Scala
sql(s"SET spark.sql.globalTempDatabase").sh
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047#discussion_r81014894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/HashByteArrayBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -59,90 +59,110 @@ object HashByteArrayBenchmark {
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Yeah its definitely caused by the call in Task to the
Utils.CallerContext.setCurrent(). It seems to be from it using the
ExecutorClassLoader to go try to check the class for the executor and I gu
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15281
Thanks - this change makes sense.
Did you change any of the content besides moving them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r81012097
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -472,27 +557,48 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66057/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66057/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`7936315`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
**[Test build #66058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66058/consoleFull)**
for PR 15047 at commit
[`238dbb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66057/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`7936315`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15282
**[Test build #66056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66056/consoleFull)**
for PR 15282 at commit
[`dde4834`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15282
[SPARK-17673] [SQL] Incorrect exchange reuse with RowDataSourceScan
(backport)
This backports https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273 to branch-2.0
Also verified the test passes after the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66044/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
**[Test build #66044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66044/consoleFull)**
for PR 14963 at commit
[`3f74d2d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66055/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`b79ebbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15281
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user jsoltren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15281
[DOCS] Reorganize explanation of Accumulators and Broadcast Variables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The discussion of the interaction of Accumulators and Broadcast Va
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
I think the test is actually in a non-ideal location, but I'm going to
merge first in order to make 2.0.1 rc4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66054/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`396ad60`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66054/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wgtmac commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r81007488
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -179,7 +180,11 @@ class HistoryServer(
}
--- End diff --
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66054/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`396ad60`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Hi @MLnick @jkbradley
Thanks for the code review. I made some changes based on your comments.
- I agree it's better to align the input types to vector in internal
implementation. Spa
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
When encoding, I convert the InternalRow(UnsafeRow) into a byte array and
use Base64 to encode as a string; when decoding, use Base64 to decode from a
string and convert the byte array to an UnsafeR
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #66053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66053/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
[`1d3dd62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66051/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66051/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`a1c344b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
**[Test build #66052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66052/consoleFull)**
for PR 15274 at commit
[`360b97b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66051/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`a1c344b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
**[Test build #66050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66050/consoleFull)**
for PR 15247 at commit
[`67ea2de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000695
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000597
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000578
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000599
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000707
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000698
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000563
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000584
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000669
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000659
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000555
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000488
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81000523
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
201 - 300 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
