Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15292
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15292
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66365/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15292
**[Test build #66365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66365/consoleFull)**
for PR 15292 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15231
I think also it would be great to add to examples one for read.df and one
for write.df without the path parameter (like a jdbc one)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15359
**[Test build #66377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66377/consoleFull)**
for PR 15359 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15231#discussion_r81904325
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_utils.R ---
@@ -167,10 +167,13 @@ test_that("convertToJSaveMode", {
})
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15359
cc @zhengruifeng @sethah
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15359
[Minor][ML] Avoid 2D array flatten in NB training.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid 2D array flatten in ```NaiveBayes``` training, since flatten method
might be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15258
**[Test build #66374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66374/consoleFull)**
for PR 15258 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15262
**[Test build #66373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66373/consoleFull)**
for PR 15262 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66361/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #66375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66375/consoleFull)**
for PR 14151 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
**[Test build #66376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66376/consoleFull)**
for PR 14087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
**[Test build #66361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66361/consoleFull)**
for PR 15355 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #66372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66372/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12355
It seems working fine now. Therefore, it seems not a problem.
```scala
test("SPARK-14344 - write metadata")
withSQLConf(ParquetOutputFormat.ENABLE_JOB_SUMMARY -> "true") {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66358/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
**[Test build #66358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66358/consoleFull)**
for PR 15249 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #66360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66360/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66362/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15357#discussion_r81901737
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -265,7 +265,9 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66362/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12693
@srowen I am willing to proceed this too if you approve and @taoli91 is not
echoing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15357
**[Test build #66371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66371/consoleFull)**
for PR 15357 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66359/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #66359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66359/consoleFull)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66363/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #66363 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66363/consoleFull)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15357#discussion_r81900796
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -265,7 +265,9 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15357#discussion_r81900460
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -265,7 +265,9 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
**[Test build #66370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66370/consoleFull)**
for PR 15358 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
Hide Credentials in CREATE and DESC FORMATTED/EXTENDED a PERSISTENT/TEMP
Table for JDBC
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66356/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #66356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66356/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66364/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #66364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66364/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r81899064
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -525,8 +645,62 @@ class StreamExecution(
case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66369/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15357
**[Test build #66368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66368/consoleFull)**
for PR 15357 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r81899011
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -525,8 +645,62 @@ class StreamExecution(
case
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66357/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15357
[SPARK-17328][SQL] Fix NPE with EXPLAIN DESCRIBE TABLE
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the following NPE scenario.
**Reported Error
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
**[Test build #66357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66357/consoleFull)**
for PR 15044 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
**[Test build #66367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66367/consoleFull)**
for PR 15249 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Thanks, I should update one file and update it later today in Japan.
PR #13758 can also solve this issue without allocating UnsafeArrayData. I
think that PR #13758 is a generic solution and
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
@kayousterhout @mridulm thanks for the feedback. obviously still need to
figure out the timeout thing but otherwise think I've addressed things. will
do another pass in the morning.
---
If your
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81898588
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
@mridulm on the questions about expiry from blacklists, you are not missing
anything -- this explictly does not do any timeouts at the taskset level (this
is mentioned in the design doc). The
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66352/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66352/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15356
FYI, for 15294, the JIRA is set as `Won't fix`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15356
Just to defense myself, it seems the PR such 15339 against a branch to a
branch leaving a failure mark for each commit in the branches
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15351
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66354/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15356
**[Test build #66366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66366/consoleFull)**
for PR 15356 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15351
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15351
**[Test build #66354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66354/consoleFull)**
for PR 15351 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15356
[BUILD] Closing some stale PRs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to close some stale PRs and ones suggested to be closed by
committer(s) or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66353/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66353/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15292
**[Test build #66365 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66365/consoleFull)**
for PR 15292 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15348
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15348
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66349/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15348
**[Test build #66349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66349/consoleFull)**
for PR 15348 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15348
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15348
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66351/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15348
**[Test build #66351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66351/consoleFull)**
for PR 15348 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81896656
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15246
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #66364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66364/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15246
The changes should be safe to
`org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka010.DirectKafkaStreamSuite.pattern based
subscription`, I'll re-trigger again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66350/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66350/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
@gatorsmile does this LGTY?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
I have generally been unable to reproduce these kinds of test failures on
my local environment, and don't have access to the build server, so trying fix
without repro is pretty much shooting
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66348/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66348/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r81895371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -525,8 +645,62 @@ class StreamExecution(
case
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66355/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #66355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66355/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81895140
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetBlacklist.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66362/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #66363 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66363/consoleFull)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
**[Test build #66361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66361/consoleFull)**
for PR 15355 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
cc @koeninger any idea why this flaky?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
[SPARK-17782][STREAMING]Disable Kafka 010 pattern based subscription test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR disables the `pattern based subscription` test in the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #66360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66360/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
