Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820#discussion_r88758179
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaConsumer.scala
---
@@ -47,40 +51,191 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820#discussion_r88757785
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaConsumer.scala
---
@@ -47,40 +51,191 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15594
@vanzin I believe this might be your realm :) Could you please help review
this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
To clarify, does this overflow only occur when
`spark.storage.unrollMemoryThreshold` has been manually set to a huge value
which doesn't fit into an int?
Setting the chunk size to `Intege
Github user lresende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15594#discussion_r88752705
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIService.scala
---
@@ -57,7 +59,24 @@ private[hive] class S
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15827
Thanks for doing this. I just merged #15852. Could you close this PR,
please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923#discussion_r88756017
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -305,40 +312,82 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88755507
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -103,5 +109,192 @@ case class GenerateExec(
}
}
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
I think I have contaminated the PR with some of my old code. I will push a
new PR soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88754155
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -113,4 +117,25 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite extends S
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #68875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68875/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
[`af9a516`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
**[Test build #68874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68874/consoleFull)**
for PR 15935 at commit
[`328ca39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user nsyca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
[SPARK-18504][SQL] Scalar subquery with extra group by columns returning
incorrect result
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR blocks an incorrect result scenario in s
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88753306
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -103,5 +109,182 @@ case class GenerateExec(
}
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
[SPARK-] add checksum for blocks of broadcast
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A TorrentBroadcast is serialized and compressed first, then splitted as
fixed size blocks,
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
@joshrosen @zsxwing Could you help to review this one ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
@rxin @srowen could I get merge pls if there are no other issues?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
**[Test build #68873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68873/consoleFull)**
for PR 15934 at commit
[`0f3e4af`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
In the future, more code changes might break Hive compatibility
accidentally or intentionally.
Maybe, we can introduce a configuration flag. For example, in DB2, we have
a flag like
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
[SPARK-18497][SS]Make ForeachSink support watermark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The issue in ForeachSink is the new created DataSet still uses the old
QueryExecutio
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Documentation and PR descriptions are updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15933
**[Test build #68872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68872/consoleFull)**
for PR 15933 at commit
[`1a713fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15933#discussion_r88747950
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
}
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15933
[SPARK-18505][SQL] Simplify AnalyzeColumnCommand
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I'm spending more time at the design & code level for cost-based optimizer
now, and have found
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68871/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
[`28718d0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
**[Test build #68870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68870/consoleFull)**
for PR 15923 at commit
[`c85a216`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15866
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15866
Merged to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Yeah, please improve the document comments and PR descriptions.
It sounds like this is almost ready to merge after these changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Ah, right. Now always!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
> This option applies only to writing with additional coalesce operation.
It is not clear. We do not always call `coalesce`. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
@jkbradley Awesome, thanks so much! :) Now that the API is finalized, I
will work on the User Doc
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88740233
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -103,5 +109,182 @@ case class GenerateExec(
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15926
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
I will take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15870
Thanks for doing this. Could you resolve the conflicts, please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
Sure I'll put it in first thing tomorrow if there are no objections.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
@Yunni Thanks for the updates! I don't think we should include
AND-amplification for 2.1 since we're already in QA. But it'd be nice to get
it in 2.2. Also, 2.2 will give us plenty of time to d
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@yinxusen I took a look at the updates. Will you be able to create the
design doc that Joseph mentioned?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88725427
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -35,7 +38,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, udf}
import
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88724978
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -35,7 +38,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, udf}
import
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88714626
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -124,7 +147,8 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
@Since("2.0.0")
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88713108
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ object KMeans {
val RANDOM = "random"
@Sin
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88722547
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -145,18 +150,67 @@ class KMeansSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLlibT
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88713359
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -284,11 +309,26 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
/** @group se
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88715322
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -306,6 +346,25 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88725396
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -35,7 +38,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, udf}
import
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88713635
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -284,11 +309,26 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
/** @group se
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68868/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
**[Test build #68868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68868/consoleFull)**
for PR 15921 at commit
[`306f7fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921#discussion_r88731863
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -495,7 +498,10 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
def checkpoint(): Dataset[
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921#discussion_r88731845
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -485,7 +485,10 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
def isStreaming: Boolean =
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921#discussion_r88731880
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -322,6 +322,53 @@ def show(self, n=20, truncate=True):
def __repr__(self):
return "Data
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813#discussion_r88728867
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -173,35 +178,17 @@ class CSVFileFormat extends
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15925
That's why I was suggesting just generate "false" for in(empty seq).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r88722954
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * L
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
Nice - given it's a tiny change I'd put this in 2.1, unless somebody else
objects.
@srowen ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15917
@ponkin mind closing the pull request given your findings on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18252 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15898
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user reggert commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15899
I don't get why you say that it "doesn't even work in general". Under what
circumstances doesn't it work? I've never run into any problems with it.
The "simple syntactic sugar" allows very
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
**[Test build #68870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68870/consoleFull)**
for PR 15923 at commit
[`c85a216`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15909
**[Test build #68869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68869/consoleFull)**
for PR 15909 at commit
[`e92a038`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68869/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13320
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13320
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68863/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13320
**[Test build #68863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68863/consoleFull)**
for PR 13320 at commit
[`ba3f2a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68861/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
Hi @WeichenXu123 Thank you for this PR. Sorry for taking so long to get
back to you. Your optimization would be very helpful. I have a couple thoughts
though. Your examples always take into account f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68859/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
**[Test build #68861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68861/consoleFull)**
for PR 15889 at commit
[`ee5b035`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
**[Test build #68859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68859/consoleFull)**
for PR 15889 at commit
[`4576f7d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13736
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13736
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68862/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13736
**[Test build #68862 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68862/consoleFull)**
for PR 13736 at commit
[`10dca0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15909
**[Test build #68869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68869/consoleFull)**
for PR 15909 at commit
[`e92a038`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68860/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
**[Test build #68860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68860/consoleFull)**
for PR 14812 at commit
[`22743c7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
**[Test build #68868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68868/consoleFull)**
for PR 15921 at commit
[`306f7fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15901
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15901
**[Test build #68858 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68858/consoleFull)**
for PR 15901 at commit
[`f8acda6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15901
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68858/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
Yep that's precisely what I was envisioning. Thanks @srowen !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15929#discussion_r88701973
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -512,6 +517,9 @@ class CodegenContext
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68856/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15930
cc @mengxr @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #68856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68856/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`b713712`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
101 - 200 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
