Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r90934291
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/isoreg.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r90933987
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/gaussianMixture.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r90933235
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -512,39 +512,33 @@ head(teenagers)
# Machine Learning
-SparkR supports the following machine
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
**[Test build #69679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69679/consoleFull)**
for PR 16151 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user nchammas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
[SPARK-18719] Add spark.ui.showConsoleProgress to configuration docs
This PR adds `spark.ui.showConsoleProgress` to the configuration docs.
I tested this PR by building the docs locally
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150
**[Test build #69678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69678/consoleFull)**
for PR 16150 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
The NPE without stack trace is probably because
http://jawspeak.com/2010/05/26/hotspot-caused-exceptions-to-lose-their-stack-traces-in-production-and-the-fix/
---
If your project is set up for
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150
[SPARK-18349][SparkR]:Update R API documentation on ml model summary
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR, the document of `summary` method is improved in the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
**[Test build #69677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69677/consoleFull)**
for PR 16103 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
I'm going to revert this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
@cloud-fan why did we merge this in branch-2.1? Does this fix any bugs?
The change looks invasive.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145#discussion_r90928494
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ShuffledRowRDD.scala ---
@@ -117,7 +113,7 @@ class CoalescedPartitioner(val parent:
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16149
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
**[Test build #69676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69676/consoleFull)**
for PR 16068 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16149
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16149
[SPARK-18715][ML]Fix AIC calculations in Binomial GLM
The AIC calculation in Binomial GLM seems to be off when the response or
weight is non-integer: the result is different from that in R.
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10225
@JoshRosen We just renew this PR, could you kindly help take a look at?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16141
Thank you, @shivaram !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16141
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16141
LGTM. Thanks @dongjoon-hyun - Merging into master, branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69675/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
**[Test build #69675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69675/consoleFull)**
for PR 16103 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
**[Test build #69675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69675/consoleFull)**
for PR 16103 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
@cloud-fan I'm not familiar enough with that code to be comfortable making
that change. Can you submit a PR against
`VideoAmp:spark-18572-list_partition_names` with the necessary changes to this
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90912181
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69672/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
**[Test build #69672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69672/consoleFull)**
for PR 16147 at commit
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
@davies, @zero323, and @holdenk this is in a good place for review if you
want to take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r90899108
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DateFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -351,34 +351,81 @@ class DateFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69674/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
**[Test build #69674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69674/consoleFull)**
for PR 16121 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
**[Test build #69673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69673/consoleFull)**
for PR 16148 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69673/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
**[Test build #69674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69674/consoleFull)**
for PR 16121 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
**[Test build #69673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69673/consoleFull)**
for PR 16148 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
[SPARK-18325][SparkR][ML] SparkR ML wrappers example code and user guide
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Add all R examples for ML wrappers which were added during 2.1
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90882138
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69668/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #69668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69668/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69670/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145
**[Test build #69670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69670/consoleFull)**
for PR 16145 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
Build started: [TESTS] `org.apache.spark.sql.sources.InsertSuite`
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147#discussion_r90871682
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -85,31 +86,39 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147#discussion_r90870969
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncherSuite.java ---
@@ -155,6 +157,10 @@ public void testRedirectToLog() throws Exception
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
[SPARK-18718][TESTS] Skip some test failures due to path length limitation
and fix tests to pass on Windows
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some tests
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
**[Test build #69672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69672/consoleFull)**
for PR 16147 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16146
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
@cloud-fan created https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16146 for
backporting to 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user kapilsingh5050 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16146
[SPARK-18091] [SQL] [BACKPORT-1.6] Deep if expressions cause Generated
SpecificUnsafeProjection code to exceed JVM code size limit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69669/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69669/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69671/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
**[Test build #69671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69671/consoleFull)**
for PR 16139 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
I think we can just fix it in this PR, it's only several lines change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #69668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69668/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69669/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145
**[Test build #69670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69670/consoleFull)**
for PR 16145 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
**[Test build #69671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69671/consoleFull)**
for PR 16139 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
**[Test build #69665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69665/consoleFull)**
for PR 16143 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69667/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144
**[Test build #69667 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69667/consoleFull)**
for PR 16144 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
@srowen fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90845888
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
@SparkQA Test it agagin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16140
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16140
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69664/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16140
**[Test build #69664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69664/consoleFull)**
for PR 16140 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
retest it please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145
[MINOR][CORE][SQL] Remove explicit RDD and Partition overrides
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I **believe** that I _only_ removed duplicated code (that adds
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144
**[Test build #69667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69667/consoleFull)**
for PR 16144 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #69666 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69666/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69666/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144
[MINOR][CORE][SQL][DOCS] Typo fixes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Typo fixes
## How was this patch tested?
Local build. Awaiting the official
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
**[Test build #69665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69665/consoleFull)**
for PR 16143 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
**[Test build #69666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69666/consoleFull)**
for PR 16142 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
cc @rxin @yhuai @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
[SPARK-18711][SQL] should disable subexpression elimination for
LambdaVariable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is kind of a long-standing bug, it's hidden until
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
[SPARK-18716][CORE] Restrict the disk usage of spark event log.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We've had reports of overfull disk usage of spark event log file.
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r90826780
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -112,7 +112,25 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logging
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139#discussion_r90825257
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -59,17 +59,22 @@ Given $n$ weighted observations $(w_i, a_i, b_i)$:
The number of features for each
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16136
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16136
Merged into master and branch-2.1. Thanks for reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16059
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16059
LGTM, merged into master and branch-2.1. Thanks for all.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16141
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69663/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16141
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
401 - 500 of 511 matches
Mail list logo
