Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16995
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #73137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73137/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
GitHub user lxsmnv opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16995
[SPARK-19340][SQL] CSV file will result in an exception if the filename
contains special characters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The root cause of the problem is that
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r101939121
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user dding3 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r101938997
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Pregel.scala ---
@@ -122,27 +125,39 @@ object Pregel extends Logging {
require(maxIterations
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #73138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73138/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73135/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994
**[Test build #73135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73135/testReport)**
for PR 16994 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #73137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73137/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101938630
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -287,31 +320,16 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101938607
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -108,9 +107,21 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101938559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,23 +130,45 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #73136 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73136/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73136/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #73136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73136/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171#discussion_r101937841
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py ---
@@ -20,12 +20,14 @@
if sys.version >= '3':
xrange = range
+from pyspark import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101937726
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101937691
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101937619
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101937627
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101937350
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101937277
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,389 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101936947
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+/*
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994#discussion_r101935398
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ class BucketedReadSuite extends
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Are tests flaky right now? Otherwise it seems like this has introduced
legitimate issue with the test timing out. Three times in a row.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994
**[Test build #73135 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73135/testReport)**
for PR 16994 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994
cc @tejasapatil @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16994
[SPARK-15453] [SQL] [Follow-up] FileSourceScanExec to extract
`outputOrdering` information
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`outputOrdering` is also dependent on whether
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16611
@rxin, does this sounds okay to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73133/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73133/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73134/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #73134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73134/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
I initially left the similar comment in the same JIRAs. However, that there
are a quite bit of similar JIRAs complaining about this and the original CSV
(as the thirdparty library) tries to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #73134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73134/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #3580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3580/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
@cloud-fan I have updated code based on your feedback. Please review it
again. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73133/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
@viirya I've updated the PR to include the initial catalog table checks
you've suggested in the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73131/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73131/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
```
[info] *** 34 TESTS FAILED ***
[error] Failed: Total 2311, Failed 34, Errors 0, Passed 2277, Ignored 597
[error] Failed tests:
[error]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
**[Test build #73132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73132/testReport)**
for PR 16968 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73132/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
Thanks for the review. Updated to binary.
Also add the reference to R example.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
**[Test build #73132 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73132/testReport)**
for PR 16968 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
hmm, I understand the motivation for this, though my understanding with csv
generally either avoid having newline in field or some implementation would
require quotes around field value with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73131 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73131/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73130/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
**[Test build #73130 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73130/testReport)**
for PR 16988 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968#discussion_r101924719
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -363,6 +363,44 @@ Refer to the [R API docs](api/R/spark.mlp.html) for
more details.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73129/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #73129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73129/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #3580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3580/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
**[Test build #73130 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73130/testReport)**
for PR 16988 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #73129 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73129/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16993
Please read http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html and start not with
code but with a design doc. However, this has been discussed before on JIRA too
IIRC and rejected.
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16993
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zhangqiang2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16993
Dynamic Batch Interval Adjustment
The current Spark Streaming version cannot support the change of batch
interval at runtime, given that the speed of input data streams may not highly
dynamic
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
I'll update in a day, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
I'll update in a day, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
cc @kayousterhout @markhamstra @squito
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user erenavsarogullari opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
[SPARK-19662][SCHEDULER][TEST] Add Fair Scheduler Unit Test coverage for
different build cases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fair Scheduler can be built via one
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r101917807
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,12 +76,13 @@ abstract class FileStreamSourceTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73128/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
**[Test build #73128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73128/testReport)**
for PR 16990 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16790
@srowen @vanzin
Thanks a lot for the work on this ~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16790
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16790
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user eyalzit opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
[SPARK-19594][Structured Streaming] StreamingQueryListener fails to handle
QueryTerminatedEvent if more then one listeners exists
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
**[Test build #73128 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73128/testReport)**
for PR 16990 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
@vanzin @squito
Would you mind to take a look at this when have time ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
**[Test build #73127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73127/testReport)**
for PR 16990 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73127/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
**[Test build #73127 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73127/testReport)**
for PR 16990 at commit
101 - 200 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
