Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
I think you might push more changes in the following few hours. If the
changes are clean and safe, we still need a SQLConf to ensure the behaviors can
be changed back. We might not be able to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
**[Test build #79879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79879/testReport)**
for PR 18388 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
**[Test build #79878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79878/testReport)**
for PR 18687 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18718
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user shaofei007 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18718
[SPARK-21357][DStreams] FileInputDStream not remove out of date RDD
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```DStreams
class FileInputDStream
[line
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
> Once a dataset is uncached, the same fragment of logical plan in other
datasets should fallback to uncached plan.
This is true, although the plan looks like the same. However, the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
**[Test build #79877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79877/testReport)**
for PR 18687 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658#discussion_r128910412
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -562,6 +562,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658#discussion_r128910402
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1037,25 +1038,27 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658#discussion_r128910407
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1037,25 +1038,27 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
**[Test build #79876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79876/testReport)**
for PR 18687 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18717
**[Test build #79875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79875/testReport)**
for PR 18717 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18717
[SPARK-21510] [SQL] Add isMaterialized() and eager persist() to Dataset APIs
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when using Spark, the beginners do not realize
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79873/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79874/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716
**[Test build #79874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79874/testReport)**
for PR 18716 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18715
**[Test build #79873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79873/testReport)**
for PR 18715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79872/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
**[Test build #79872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79872/testReport)**
for PR 18696 at commit
Github user benradford commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234
@srowen @felixcheung: I believe all concerns have been addressed. Please
let me know if there are any remaining issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user benradford commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234#discussion_r123727450
--- Diff: R/pkg/DESCRIPTION ---
@@ -54,5 +54,5 @@ Collate:
'types.R'
'utils.R'
'window.R'
-RoxygenNote: 5.0.1
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714#discussion_r128909042
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.scala
---
@@ -52,12 +55,22 @@ class
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
ping @cloud-fan, @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704
ping @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79871/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658
**[Test build #79871 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79871/testReport)**
for PR 18658 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714#discussion_r128908523
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -881,6 +881,16 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714#discussion_r128908519
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -881,6 +881,16 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716
**[Test build #79874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79874/testReport)**
for PR 18716 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716#discussion_r128908504
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/HadoopFsRelationTest.scala
---
@@ -783,52 +780,6 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716
cc @jiangxb1987 @robert3005
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18716
[SPARK-10063] Follow-up: remove a useless test related to an old output
committer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's a follow-up of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18715
**[Test build #79873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79873/testReport)**
for PR 18715 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645
It is still source breaking change, and this is why I was saying it would
be a lot of work to upgrade to Scala 2.12 without breaking existing source
code. For 2.12 we should get rid of the functions
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18715
cc @tdas Was there a reason to use ``?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18715
[minor] Remove in test case names in FlatMapGroupsWithStateSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes the `` string from test names in
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18709
"Create Version" isn't a good user facing description. It'd make more sense
to just say "Created by Spark xxx"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714#discussion_r128908118
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -881,6 +881,16 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
**[Test build #79872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79872/testReport)**
for PR 18696 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18689
interesting, that test should be removed, or the test should fail, let me
take a closer look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
Since you said it is well defined, then I suppose that the coded behavior
of cache:
* Once a dataset is cached, the same fragment of logical plan in other
datasets should use the cached
Github user robert3005 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18689
Shouldn't
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/HadoopFsRelationTest.scala#L786
also be removed? As I understand it it checks whether
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658
**[Test build #79871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79871/testReport)**
for PR 18658 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658#discussion_r128906812
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1037,25 +1037,25 @@ object
Github user pjfanning commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658#discussion_r128906682
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1037,25 +1037,25 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18658#discussion_r128906085
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1037,25 +1037,25 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
**[Test build #79870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79870/testReport)**
for PR 18714 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
It is well defined, but never well documented. So far, there are multiple
issues in the existing cache mechanism. We hesitate to do any major change
until we figure out what is the next step of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79869/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18713
**[Test build #79869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79869/testReport)**
for PR 18713 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
**[Test build #79870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79870/testReport)**
for PR 18714 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
cc @gatorsmile @ericl
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
[SPARK-20236][SQL] hive style partition overwrite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When overwriting a partitioned table with dynamic partition columns, the
behavior
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79868/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79868/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79867/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79867/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18712
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79866/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18712
**[Test build #79866 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79866/testReport)**
for PR 18712 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18713
**[Test build #79869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79869/testReport)**
for PR 18713 at commit
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18713
[SPARK-21509][SQL] Add a config to enable adaptive query execution only for
the last queâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Feature of adaptive query execution is a good
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
We need to well define the cache behavior of Dataset.
I agree that once a table is cached, other Dataset should use the cached
table without reading it again.
Then once a table is
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18687
There is another case we should fix. You can see the storage level of ds2
is StorageLevel.NONE, but its executed plan is still cached version.
scala> Seq("1",
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18543
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18160
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
gentle ping @davies and @JoshRosen. I guess it is mainly just about a
decision - whether we expose it in any way or remove it out if I am not
mistaken.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18618#discussion_r128896314
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -445,9 +445,12 @@ class StructType(DataType):
This is the data type representing a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79868/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79867/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
@rxin, while fixing minor cleanup, the comment was folded but please see
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r128892162.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18712
**[Test build #79866 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79866/testReport)**
for PR 18712 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18712
cc @liancheng @WeichenXu123
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18712
[SPARK-17528][SQL][followup] remove unnecessary data copy in object hash
aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In #18483 , we fixed the data copy bug when saving
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79865/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
**[Test build #79865 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79865/testReport)**
for PR 18711 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79864/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79864/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79863/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79863/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79862/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79862 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79862/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79861/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
**[Test build #79861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79861/testReport)**
for PR 18711 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540
LGTM except some minor comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r128894965
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNodeSuite.scala
---
@@ -436,21 +436,22 @@ class TreeNodeSuite extends
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
