Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22504#discussion_r228669149
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -274,11 +275,20 @@ private[history] class
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852
I would rather see someone more familiar with K8s that uses it document it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user ifilonenko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
@felixcheung and @erikerlandson for merge
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
yeah... wasn't worried about the PRB failing. thanks for the
merge/backport!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98102/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852
I don't feel strongly about it; go ahead.
If someone lands on this page, do they pretty easily come away with the
impression they need to set spark.authenticate and network security if they
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98104/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
**[Test build #98102 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98102/testReport)**
for PR 22820 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
**[Test build #98104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98104/testReport)**
for PR 22854 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852
so I had filed a jira to update mesos docs more detail about security
things (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25024) which I need to
follow up on, but I didn't file one for k8s. It
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r228671263
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ private[spark] class
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228668756
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
**[Test build #98107 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98107/testReport)**
for PR 22288 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r228667186
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/KafkaDelegationTokenProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
build is green, and everything looks to be behaving normally!
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/sknapp-testing-spark-branch-2.4-test-maven-hadoop-2.7/12/console
ready
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228666789
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r228666433
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/KafkaDelegationTokenProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r228665965
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98098/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
**[Test build #98098 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98098/testReport)**
for PR 19045 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852
I looked at the existing docs after I wrote my comment and saw that
paragraph. I think it's fine, maybe just in need of some update now that we
have k8s, although I'm not sure yet how
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98096/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22856
**[Test build #98106 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98106/testReport)**
for PR 22856 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22856
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852
we can add stronger wording for standalone if you want, I know the text
was recently updated (I believe by you) to have the below:
> For other resource managers,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
**[Test build #98096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98096/testReport)**
for PR 22425 at commit
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22856
[SPARK-25856][SQL][MINOR] Remove AverageLike and CountLike classes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These two classes were added for regr_ expression support
Github user parente commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18339
@holdenk Took a note to look at this weekend.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21654
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21654
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98095/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21654
**[Test build #98095 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98095/testReport)**
for PR 21654 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98100/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
**[Test build #98100 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98100/testReport)**
for PR 22815 at commit
Github user huaxingao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710
@felixcheung I am terribly sorry that I missed your comment for the ml doc
and example for 2.4. Is it still time to merge in 2.4? I saw one of my PR got
merged in 2.4 last night. I can submit a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624
**[Test build #98105 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98105/testReport)**
for PR 22624 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624
I tested the last update with yarn cluster and client, both seem happy.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98101/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
**[Test build #98101 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98101/testReport)**
for PR 22824 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624
>> Is there any place which documents this overall flow?
>
> Not yet. I plan to write a README.md explaining this, separately, since
there's a lot of
confusion not just about the flow,
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228644504
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624#discussion_r228644038
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@ -17,76 +17,175 @@
package
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228642238
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98093/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228642015
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
**[Test build #98093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98093/testReport)**
for PR 22853 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228640680
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228638310
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228637254
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228636999
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228637047
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,31 @@ trait RuntimeReplaceable
GitHub user patrickbrownsync opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22855
[SPARK-25839] [Core] Implement use of KryoPool in KryoSerializer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Implement (optional) use of KryoPool in KryoSerializer, an
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228636880
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15670
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98097/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15670
**[Test build #98097 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98097/consoleFull)**
for PR 15670 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228636110
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,31 @@ trait RuntimeReplaceable
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228635413
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228635201
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,31 @@ trait RuntimeReplaceable
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228634827
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,31 @@ trait RuntimeReplaceable
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228634159
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228633284
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/UnevaluableAggs.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624
> Is there any place which documents this overall flow?
Not yet. I plan to write a README.md explaining this, separately, since
there's a lot of
confusion not just about the flow, but
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809#discussion_r228631452
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,31 @@ trait RuntimeReplaceable
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624#discussion_r228630414
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/security/KubernetesHadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@ -18,45
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624#discussion_r228630089
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@ -110,32 +209,105 @@ private[spark] class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624#discussion_r228628515
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@ -17,76 +17,175 @@
package
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22817
Will take a look at this tonight. Thanks for reporting this!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98092/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
I mean its easy to miss if a new "case" is added and "update" mode is not
supported. Even now how about LeftSemi, LeftAnti, FullOuter etc?
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848
**[Test build #98092 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98092/testReport)**
for PR 22848 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
**[Test build #98104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98104/testReport)**
for PR 22854 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
> Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
that was me killing the 1st PRB build
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98099/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
**[Test build #98103 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98103/testReport)**
for PR 22854 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228616782
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,14 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN"
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22843#discussion_r228616400
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -3477,39 +3447,6 @@ test_that("Window functions on a DataFrame", {
expect_equal(result,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4545/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228608360
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -503,6 +507,145 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
101 - 200 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
