[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532945950 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532945950 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532945927 **[Test build #110960 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110960/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25771#discussion_r325972364 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532945183 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532945185 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25771#discussion_r325972019 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532945185 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25771#discussion_r325972038 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532945183 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532864046 **[Test build #110934 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25828#issuecomment-532944523 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532944673 **[Test build #110934 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532944635 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #25006: [SPARK-28208][BUILD][SQL] Upgrade to ORC 1.5.6 including closing the ORC readers

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #25006: [SPARK-28208][BUILD][SQL] Upgrade to ORC 1.5.6 including closing the ORC readers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25006#issuecomment-532944356 Sure. I'll make a follow-up, @HyukjinKwon ~ Is there any other comments?

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25828#issuecomment-532944520 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532944641 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532944641 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532944635 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25828#issuecomment-532944520 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25828#issuecomment-532944523 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25828#issuecomment-532919492 **[Test build #110951 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532944391 **[Test build #110961 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110961/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25828: [SPARK-29141][SQL][TEST] Use SqlBasedBenchmark in SQL benchmarks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25828#issuecomment-532944326 **[Test build #110951 has

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25006: [SPARK-28208][BUILD][SQL] Upgrade to ORC 1.5.6 including closing the ORC readers

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25006: [SPARK-28208][BUILD][SQL] Upgrade to ORC 1.5.6 including closing the ORC readers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25006#issuecomment-532944356 Sure. I'll make a follow-up, @HyukjinKwon ~

[GitHub] [spark] wangyum commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix javadoc generation issue after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
wangyum commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix javadoc generation issue after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532943985 Thank you @dongjoon-hyun

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix javadoc generation issue after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix javadoc generation issue after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532943799 Yes. I noticed that from the previous PRs. I updated the PR title and

[GitHub] [spark] wangyum commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
wangyum commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532943547 I can reproduce it by: ```shell build/sbt -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkubernetes -Phive-thriftserver

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532943218 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532943212 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532943301 Got it. The following? ``` ./build/sbt -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkubernetes

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532943212 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532943218 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532942876 BTW, @wangyum . Is the build error correct? In your previous backporting

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532942876 BTW, @wangyum . Is the build error correct? In your PR and current `branch-2.4`,

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #24232: [SPARK-27297] [SQL] Add higher order functions to scala API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24232#issuecomment-532942923 **[Test build #110960 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110960/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
viirya commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532942492 The purpose of this config is for testing only. As convenience, you can switch it to test code in

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532942453 Oh. I see. Thanks! Let me check it manually, too.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532940166 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532940160 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] maropu commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
maropu commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532940329 @viirya one question; any reason that we cannot turn on the no-codegen mode for projections in non-test

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532940166 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532940160 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25831: [SPARK-29122][SQL] Propagate all the SQL conf to executors in SQLQueryTestSuite URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25831#issuecomment-532939876 **[Test build #110959 has

[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on issue #25838: [SPARK-29158][SQL] Expose SerializableConfiguration for DataSource V2 developers

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #25838: [SPARK-29158][SQL] Expose SerializableConfiguration for DataSource V2 developers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25838#issuecomment-532939219 I guess it's fine. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25771#discussion_r325966998 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on a change in pull request #25838: [SPARK-29158][SQL] Expose SerializableConfiguration for DataSource V2 developers

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HyukjinKwon commented on a change in pull request #25838: [SPARK-29158][SQL] Expose SerializableConfiguration for DataSource V2 developers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25838#discussion_r325966883 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532937398 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532937394 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532938467 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25841: [SPARK-28683][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532938527 **[Test build #110958 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532938464 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an automated message

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532938464 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an automated

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532938467 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532869165 **[Test build #110936 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110936/testReport)** for PR

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532938017 **[Test build #110936 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110936/testReport)** for PR 25681

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532937398 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532937394 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #25771: [SPARK-28970][SQL] Implement USE CATALOG/NAMESPACE for Data Source V2 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25771#discussion_r325965604 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] wangyum commented on issue #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
wangyum commented on issue #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841#issuecomment-532937261 cc @dongjoon-hyun This is an automated message

[GitHub] [spark] wangyum opened a new pull request #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
wangyum opened a new pull request #25841: [MINOR][BUILD][2.4] Fix build errors after upgrading genjavadoc to 0.14 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25841 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR backport https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24443 to fix

[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on issue #20958: [SPARK-23844][SS] Fix socket source honors recovered offsets issue

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #20958: [SPARK-23844][SS] Fix socket source honors recovered offsets issue URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20958#issuecomment-532937015 It's up to you. I just quickly skimmed the comments and looked close to go so I pinged you :-).

[GitHub] [spark] AngersZhuuuu commented on a change in pull request #25775: [WIP][SPARK-29015][SQL][test-hadoop3.2] fix bug for jdk11, can't use 'add jar' jar's class as create table serde

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AngersZh commented on a change in pull request #25775: [WIP][SPARK-29015][SQL][test-hadoop3.2] fix bug for jdk11, can't use 'add jar' jar's class as create table serde URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25775#discussion_r325049959 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532936738 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532936738 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532936744 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532936744 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532883191 **[Test build #110938 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532936332 **[Test build #110938 has

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on issue #25747: [SPARK-29039][SQL] centralize the catalog and table lookup logic

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on issue #25747: [SPARK-29039][SQL] centralize the catalog and table lookup logic URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25747#issuecomment-532935452 @rdblue I agree with the behavior you posted, but like you said I don't want to mix with SPARK-29014 so I

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532934842 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532934840 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an automated

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532934842 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532934840 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an automated message

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532861301 **[Test build #110933 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110933/testReport)** for PR

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25681: [SPARK-28612][SQL] Add DataFrameWriterV2 API URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25681#issuecomment-532934380 **[Test build #110933 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110933/testReport)** for PR 25681

[GitHub] [spark] jerryshao commented on issue #20958: [SPARK-23844][SS] Fix socket source honors recovered offsets issue

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
jerryshao commented on issue #20958: [SPARK-23844][SS] Fix socket source honors recovered offsets issue URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20958#issuecomment-532933204 Yes, I can merge, but are we still going to proceed this PR? This has been staled for a long time.

[GitHub] [spark] colinmjj commented on a change in pull request #25759: [SPARK-19147][CORE] Gracefully handle error in task after executor is stopped

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
colinmjj commented on a change in pull request #25759: [SPARK-19147][CORE] Gracefully handle error in task after executor is stopped URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25759#discussion_r325961757 ## File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala

[GitHub] [spark] maropu edited a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
maropu edited a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532916337 > Oh, this is good point. I think it is only said that aggregate function's buffer

[GitHub] [spark] maropu edited a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
maropu edited a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532916337 > Oh, this is good point. I think it is only said that aggregate function's buffer

[GitHub] [spark] maropu edited a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
maropu edited a comment on issue #25830: [SPARK-29140][SQL] Handle parameters having "array" of javaType properly in HashAggregateExec URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25830#issuecomment-532916337 > Oh, this is good point. I think it is only said that aggregate function's buffer

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on issue #25835: [SPARK-29165][SQL][TEST] Set log level of log generated code as ERROR in case of compile error on generated code in UT

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
cloud-fan commented on issue #25835: [SPARK-29165][SQL][TEST] Set log level of log generated code as ERROR in case of compile error on generated code in UT URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25835#issuecomment-532932030 @dongjoon-hyun do you know how to re-trigger the github checks?

[GitHub] [spark] zhengruifeng commented on issue #25815: [SPARK-29118][ML] Avoid redundant computation in transform of GMM & GLR

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
zhengruifeng commented on issue #25815: [SPARK-29118][ML] Avoid redundant computation in transform of GMM & GLR URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25815#issuecomment-532930612 @srowen Thanks for reviewing! This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25836#issuecomment-532930462 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25836#issuecomment-532930462 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25836#issuecomment-532930457 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25836#issuecomment-532930457 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on issue #25006: [SPARK-28208][BUILD][SQL] Upgrade to ORC 1.5.6 including closing the ORC readers

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #25006: [SPARK-28208][BUILD][SQL] Upgrade to ORC 1.5.6 including closing the ORC readers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25006#issuecomment-532930280 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25006#discussion_r298788206 is a valid comment. Can we fix it

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25836#issuecomment-532930208 **[Test build #110957 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/110957/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #25836: [SPARK-29159][BUILD] Increase ReservedCodeCacheSize to 1G URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25836#issuecomment-532929816 retest this please This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532929110 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532929108 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532929110 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532929108 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532927775 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532928833 **[Test build #110955 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #25840: [SPARK-29166][SQL] Add a parameter to limit the number of dynamic partitions for data source table URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25840#issuecomment-532927771 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #25837: [SPARK-29161][CORE][SQL][STREAMING] Unify default wait time for waitUntilEmpty

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on issue #25837: [SPARK-29161][CORE][SQL][STREAMING] Unify default wait time for waitUntilEmpty URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25837#issuecomment-532928842 **[Test build #110956 has

[GitHub] [spark] HeartSaVioR commented on issue #25837: [SPARK-29161][CORE][SQL][STREAMING] Unify default wait time for waitUntilEmpty

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HeartSaVioR commented on issue #25837: [SPARK-29161][CORE][SQL][STREAMING] Unify default wait time for waitUntilEmpty URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25837#issuecomment-532928279 retest this, please This is an

[GitHub] [spark] HeartSaVioR commented on issue #25837: [SPARK-29161][CORE][SQL][STREAMING] Unify default wait time for waitUntilEmpty

2019-09-18 Thread GitBox
HeartSaVioR commented on issue #25837: [SPARK-29161][CORE][SQL][STREAMING] Unify default wait time for waitUntilEmpty URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25837#issuecomment-532928221 "metadata not propagated" not relevant to this patch.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >