ScrapCodes commented on pull request #29334:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29334#issuecomment-678919877
Thank you @cowtowncoder, @srowen and @Fokko. Indeed, the Security
vulnerabilities serve the purpose of generating the false alarm only and do not
apply to spark, however if
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678918248
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678918248
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
maropu commented on a change in pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#discussion_r475356961
##
File path:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveScriptTransformationSuite.scala
##
@@ -182,7 +182,11 @@ class
SparkQA commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678917855
**[Test build #127830 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127830/testReport)**
for PR 29421 at commit
maropu commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678916433
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
maropu commented on a change in pull request #29485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475352241
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
##
@@ -328,27 +328,46 @@ object TypeCoercion {
*/
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #29485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475348817
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
##
@@ -328,27 +328,46 @@ object TypeCoercion {
maropu commented on a change in pull request #29485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475347837
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
##
@@ -328,27 +328,46 @@ object TypeCoercion {
*/
viirya commented on a change in pull request #29485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475347688
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
##
@@ -328,27 +328,46 @@ object TypeCoercion {
*/
tanelk commented on pull request #29515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29515#issuecomment-678908920
There is a `org.apache.spark.sql.RandomDataGenerator`, that does pretty much
the same thing as the `LiteralGenerator`. Perhaps they should be unified?
cchighman commented on pull request #28841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28841#issuecomment-678908616
I intend to update the PR based on comments, I'll try to swing around to it
this evening.
This is an
cchighman commented on a change in pull request #28841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28841#discussion_r475347166
##
File path: docs/sql-data-sources-generic-options.md
##
@@ -119,3 +119,48 @@ To load all files recursively, you can use:
{% include_example
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28841#issuecomment-678908136
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
maropu commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678907495
Ah, I see.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #29485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475346278
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
##
@@ -328,27 +328,46 @@ object TypeCoercion {
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678907031
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
viirya commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678906923
@maropu I think #29406 was only merged to master, so we don't need to
backport this.
This is an automated
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678907031
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678844753
**[Test build #127819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127819/testReport)**
for PR 29526 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678906358
**[Test build #127819 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127819/testReport)**
for PR 29526 at commit
maropu commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678906274
Merged to master. @viirya Looks like conflicts with bnrahc3.0. Could you
backport it?
This is an automated
maropu edited a comment on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678906274
Merged to master. @viirya Looks like conflicts with branch-3.0. Could you
backport it?
This is an
viirya commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678906138
Thanks all!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
maropu closed pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678905843
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678905843
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678845961
**[Test build #127820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127820/testReport)**
for PR 29526 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678905088
**[Test build #127820 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127820/testReport)**
for PR 29526 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678903482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA commented on pull request #29414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29414#issuecomment-678903820
**[Test build #127829 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127829/testReport)**
for PR 29414 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678903475
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678859868
**[Test build #127823 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127823/testReport)**
for PR 29421 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678903475
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
srowen commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678903211
Oh yeah, to backport, you would need to check out branch-3.0, cherry-pick
the commit, and the push straight to branch-3.0. It's not hard, just doesn't
use the script (I don't
SparkQA commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678903206
**[Test build #127823 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127823/testReport)**
for PR 29421 at commit
AngersZh commented on a change in pull request #29414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29414#discussion_r475341428
##
File path: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/transform.sql.out
##
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+-- Automatically generated by SQLQueryTestSuite
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29414#issuecomment-678902339
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29414#issuecomment-678902339
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AngersZh commented on a change in pull request #29414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29414#discussion_r475341428
##
File path: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/transform.sql.out
##
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+-- Automatically generated by SQLQueryTestSuite
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678900712
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678900708
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678870379
**[Test build #127824 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127824/testReport)**
for PR 29516 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678900708
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
huaxingao commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678899420
I don't know how to merge this one. I got the following message:
```
Pull request 29501 is not mergeable in its current form.
Continue? (experts only!) (y/n):
```
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29513#issuecomment-678897328
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29513#issuecomment-678897328
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29513#issuecomment-678897095
**[Test build #127828 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127828/testReport)**
for PR 29513 at commit
viirya commented on pull request #29513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29513#issuecomment-678896440
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29527#issuecomment-678895387
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29527#issuecomment-678895672
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29527#issuecomment-678895387
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
srowen commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678895333
Go ahead yes
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
dmoore62 opened a new pull request #29527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29527
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
### Why are the changes needed?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How
huaxingao commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678893930
@srowen I will merge into 3.0?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
huaxingao commented on pull request #29524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29524#issuecomment-678893290
Merged to 3.0. Thank you all!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
huaxingao closed pull request #29524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29524
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29228#issuecomment-67647
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#issuecomment-67621
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#issuecomment-67621
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29228#issuecomment-67647
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29228#issuecomment-67372
**[Test build #127827 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127827/testReport)**
for PR 29228 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#issuecomment-67349
**[Test build #127826 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127826/testReport)**
for PR 29509 at commit
huaxingao commented on pull request #29355:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29355#issuecomment-678887751
Thanks a lot! @maropu
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#discussion_r475325934
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStoreSuite.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#discussion_r475325165
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStoreSuite.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#discussion_r475325041
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStoreSuite.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#discussion_r475325096
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStoreSuite.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#discussion_r475325018
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
##
@@ -1509,13 +1513,18 @@ class
huaxingao commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678885037
I think we need to put the fix in 3.0, because in the case of data is
already cached, this fix makes 3.0.0 behave the same as 2.4.
In 2.4
```
cache norm in memory
cloud-fan commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678884094
good catch! LGTM
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #29509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29509#discussion_r475320679
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1214,8 +1214,8 @@ private[history] class
LuciferYang commented on pull request #29000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29000#issuecomment-678872666
@Ngone51 Could you please review it again ?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
agrawaldevesh commented on a change in pull request #29452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29452#discussion_r475310046
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorDecommissionInfo.scala
##
@@ -18,11 +18,22 @@
package
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678871882
this double caching did not exist in 2.4, and it was first introduced in
3.0.0, so I tend to put it into RC2. How doyou think about it? @huaxingao
AngersZh commented on a change in pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#discussion_r475310377
##
File path:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
##
@@ -176,9 +176,10 @@ object
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29507#issuecomment-678870683
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29507#issuecomment-678870683
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678870379
**[Test build #127824 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127824/testReport)**
for PR 29516 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29507#issuecomment-678870388
**[Test build #127825 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127825/testReport)**
for PR 29507 at commit
srowen commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678869607
Do we need it in 3.0? I'm not super against it but it's more of an
improvement, optimization, not a bug fix
srowen commented on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678869497
BTW I think we may still have a real test failure here, I'm looking into it.
This is an automated message from
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678869069
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678869069
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #29516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29516#issuecomment-678868865
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #29270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29270#discussion_r475307366
##
File path:
sql/core/src/test/resources/tpcds-plan-stability/approved-plans-modified/q10.sf100/explain.txt
##
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+== Physical Plan ==
LuciferYang commented on pull request #29434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29434#issuecomment-678867553
@srowen @cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon @dongjoon-hyun Thank you for your review~
This is an automated message from
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #29501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29501#issuecomment-678867157
@srowen @huaxingao Thanks for reviewing! would you mind to help backporting
this to 3.0? I do not have a computer to do this right now
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29477#issuecomment-678860803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA commented on pull request #29477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29477#issuecomment-678860789
Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/32446/
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29477#issuecomment-678860798
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29477#issuecomment-678860798
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678860152
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678860152
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29421#issuecomment-678859868
**[Test build #127823 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127823/testReport)**
for PR 29421 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678845961
**[Test build #127820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/127820/testReport)**
for PR 29526 at commit
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #29505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29505#issuecomment-678846054
Thank you and welcome, @michal-wieleba .
You are added to the Apache Spark contributor group and SPARK-32648 is
assigned to you.
viirya commented on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678845494
Yeah, we don't run hive-1.2 test usually except we know the diff touches
hive 1.2 code path. For these failed tests, they don't touch the code directly,
but affect it
dongjoon-hyun closed pull request #29505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29505
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
maropu edited a comment on pull request #29526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29526#issuecomment-678845205
Nice, thanks for the swift fixes, @viirya! Anyway, it seems we didn't notice
this test failure for 10+ days, so we need to carefully check the branches
w/hive-1.2...
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo