[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2018-08-14 Thread vanzin
Github user vanzin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 If you want to add a new config for the "kill preempted containers" functionality that would probably be an acceptable compromise. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2018-07-20 Thread chemikadze
Github user chemikadze commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 @vanzin If those would be implemented, would it have any change to get merged? We use preemption quite a lot and current behavior is not the best we can get: logs sometimes getting overfilled

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2016-07-12 Thread jerryshao
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 @vazin, sorry for the delay. I think your concern is valid that this change will probably harm the performance since 15 seconds (preemption waiting) is not a short time. But

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2016-07-12 Thread vanzin
Github user vanzin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 @jerryshao do you plan to implement either of the above suggestions? otherwise we should probably close this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2016-06-10 Thread steveloughran
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 > But I'm just trying to point out that the current change doesn't really make things better. Without killing the executor, you'll still be holding on to resources, except now you wouldn't be

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2016-06-09 Thread vanzin
Github user vanzin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 @steveloughran > I suspect that if you get told you are being pre-empted, you aren't likely to get containers elsewhere That's very possible. But I'm just trying to point out that

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2016-06-09 Thread steveloughran
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 @vanzin I suspect that if you get told you are being pre-empted, you aren't likely to get containers elsewhere —pre-emption is a sign of demand being too high, and your queue lower priority.

[GitHub] spark issue #7786: [SPARK-9468][Yarn][Core] Avoid scheduling tasks on preemp...

2016-06-08 Thread vanzin
Github user vanzin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786 > by default Yarn will preempt the container 15 seconds after the warning That's a long time and you can run a lot of tasks in that time. Unless Spark actively goes and gets rid of these