Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-154612297
@rxin @marmbrus This fix is unable to resolve the condition ambiguity for
nested self join. I also found the self joins could generate incorrect results.
---
If
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99288746
... and branch 1.4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99287769
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99256110
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99256111
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99256100
[Test build #31903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31903/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99269498
[Test build #31915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31915/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99269533
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99269530
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99252451
[Test build #31900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31900/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99252467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99252464
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99248637
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99248629
[Test build #31901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31901/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99248639
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99249025
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user rxin reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919
[SPARK-6231][SQL/DF] Automatically resolve join condition ambiguity for
self-joins.
See the comment in join function for more information.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99249768
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99249749
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99250017
[Test build #31915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31915/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919
[SPARK-6231][SQL/DF] Automatically resolve join condition ambiguity for
self-joins.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99218375
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99218672
[Test build #31900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31900/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99218463
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99220696
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99220717
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99221060
[Test build #31901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31901/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99225205
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99225318
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user damiencarol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#discussion_r29712214
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ case class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#discussion_r29712513
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ case class AttributeReference(
Github user damiencarol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#discussion_r29713157
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ case class
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#discussion_r29713542
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ case class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#discussion_r29713770
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ case class AttributeReference(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5919#issuecomment-99226164
[Test build #31903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31903/consoleFull)
for PR 5919 at commit
37 matches
Mail list logo
