Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#discussion_r24039211
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CommitDeniedException.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-72733949
[Test build #26668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26668/consoleFull)
for PR 4229 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72734625
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4343#issuecomment-72735757
[Test build #26675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26675/consoleFull)
for PR 4343 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72619816
[Test build #26635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26635/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72619824
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72620154
[Test build #575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/575/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#issuecomment-72622614
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334
[SPARK-] Enable UISeleniumSuite tests
This patch enables UISeleniumSuite, a set of tests for the Spark
application web UI. These tests were previously disabled because they were
slow, but I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#issuecomment-72622599
[Test build #26638 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26638/consoleFull)
for PR 4068 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-72633082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72631120
[Test build #26649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26649/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72631133
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3642#issuecomment-72631442
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3642#issuecomment-72632170
[Test build #26651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26651/consoleFull)
for PR 3642 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72632209
[Test build #575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/575/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
GitHub user WangTaoTheTonic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4335
[SPARK-2945][YARN][Doc]add doc for spark.executor.instances
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2945
`spark.executor.instances` works. As this JIRA recommended, we should
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-72633068
[Test build #26650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26650/consoleFull)
for PR 4334 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72633362
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4335#issuecomment-72633373
[Test build #26652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26652/consoleFull)
for PR 4335 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72633350
**[Test build #26645 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26645/consoleFull)**
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4325#issuecomment-72625660
[Test build #26642 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26642/consoleFull)
for PR 4325 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4325#issuecomment-72625668
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4332#issuecomment-72626851
[Test build #26644 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26644/consoleFull)
for PR 4332 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4332#issuecomment-72626858
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72627568
**[Test build #26637 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26637/consoleFull)**
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72627578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4333#issuecomment-72627902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4333#issuecomment-72627893
[Test build #26648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26648/consoleFull)
for PR 4333 at commit
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4330#issuecomment-72628043
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4339#issuecomment-72762303
Hey @chenghao-intel thanks for doing this. I'm making changes to this file
right now so I will roll your change in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72762127
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72762121
[Test build #26681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26681/consoleFull)
for PR 4344 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72762489
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72762480
[Test build #26682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26682/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#issuecomment-72762449
[Test build #26690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26690/consoleFull)
for PR 4345 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72763376
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72763371
[Test build #26679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26679/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72763611
Thanks. Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24052353
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -17,14 +17,17 @@
package
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24052532
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +67,70 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72763987
Also, this could probably benefit from a more comprehensive unit test of
the commit coordinator itself, since I think it's possible to alter the current
implementation
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72763888
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user x1- opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4347
[SPARK-5460][MLlib] Wrapped `Try` around `deleteAllCheckpoints` -
RandomForest.
Because `deleteAllCheckpoints` has IOException potential.
fix issue.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4347#discussion_r24053119
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -244,7 +245,10 @@ private class RandomForest (
// Delete
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4339
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4339#issuecomment-72765655
OK, I am closing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4336#discussion_r24053791
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4307#issuecomment-72767656
BTW the pull request no longer merges cleanly with the master branch. Would
be great to update. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4307#issuecomment-72767614
Can you add a test case for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24054409
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -425,25 +427,25 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24054690
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +67,70 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24054729
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -425,25 +427,25 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4340#issuecomment-72769602
[Test build #26689 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26689/consoleFull)
for PR 4340 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4340#issuecomment-72769609
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72770487
Still, though, I'd like to consider whether there's a good way to fix
this in order to guarantee that requests to commit output for a stage occur
after the stage
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4349
[FIX][MLLIB] fix seed handling in Python GMM
If `seed` is `None` on the python side, it will pass in as a `null`. So we
should use `java.lang.Long` instead of `Long` to take it.
You can merge this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72770514
[Test build #26695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26695/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72770451
Okay here are the two options.
1. createRDD returns RDD[(K,V)] or RDD[R], and DStream.foreachRDD uses
rdd.asInstanceOf[HasOffsetRanges]
2. createRDD returns
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4336#discussion_r24055322
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4340#issuecomment-72770558
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.3. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72770871
[Test build #26691 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26691/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24055623
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -459,7 +461,41 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72762448
[Test build #26691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26691/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72763752
[Test build #26692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26692/consoleFull)
for PR 4215 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72763768
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#issuecomment-72763704
Hey @mccheah - if you are too busy I think it's fine to let it slip past
1.3, given that there are still several unknowns.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72763765
**[Test build #26677 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26677/consoleFull)**
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72763703
There's one subtle, extremely-unlikely race condition that can still occur
here and which I would like to fix: currently, we seem to assume that messages
sent from the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4347#issuecomment-72764883
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72765259
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72765252
[Test build #26686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26686/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348
[SPARK-5579][SQL][DataFrame] Support for project/filter using SQL
expressions
```scala
df.selectExpr(abs(colA), colB)
df.filter(age 21)
```
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#issuecomment-72766658
[Test build #26694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26694/consoleFull)
for PR 3233 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348#issuecomment-7272
[Test build #26693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26693/consoleFull)
for PR 4348 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72767317
Do you know what the common root is? Is it just tmp? If yes, maybe we do
want to prefix spark always. If it is some special Spark tmp folder, then I
think it is fine to not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4336#discussion_r24053977
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72768195
52f575 added a user-specific root under the temp dir, so you'd always have
these directories under one that's named `spark-[uuid]`.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24054410
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -459,7 +461,41 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24054680
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -17,14 +17,17 @@
package
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24054795
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -459,7 +461,41 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72769307
Then this lgtm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#issuecomment-72769530
[Test build #26687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26687/consoleFull)
for PR 4345 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#issuecomment-72769536
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#discussion_r24055018
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4314#discussion_r24055002
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/dataTypes.scala ---
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ case object DateType extends NativeType {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#issuecomment-72770311
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#issuecomment-72770304
[Test build #26688 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26688/consoleFull)
for PR 4345 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4340
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#discussion_r24055407
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -26,9 +27,8 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4336#discussion_r24055445
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72770879
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4349#issuecomment-72771073
[Test build #26696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26696/consoleFull)
for PR 4349 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4336#discussion_r24055512
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4336#discussion_r24055684
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72617088
I took a pass through the public API. I'm not very familiar with Kafka so
it was somewhat slow going. However, some reactions:
1. We should try to tighten,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72617481
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72617479
[Test build #26643 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26643/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4331#issuecomment-72617632
[Test build #26646 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26646/consoleFull)
for PR 4331 at commit
501 - 600 of 684 matches
Mail list logo
