Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-122772276
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7509#issuecomment-122772218
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-122772268
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#issuecomment-122776540
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7154#issuecomment-122776612
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7154#issuecomment-122776552
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#issuecomment-122776235
Looks pretty good. I'm going to merge it. Please submit a followup pr to
address some of the comments on documentation and choice of buffer size.
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7526#issuecomment-122776566
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7526#issuecomment-122776531
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7154#issuecomment-122776765
[Test build #37812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37812/consoleFull)
for PR 7154 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#issuecomment-122776608
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user GraceH opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7528
Avoid assigning tasks to lost executor(s)
Now, when some executors are killed by dynamic-allocation, it leads to some
mis-assignment onto lost executors sometimes. Such kind of mis-assignment
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7462#issuecomment-122782256
[Test build #37801 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37801/console)
for PR 7462 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4380#issuecomment-122782405
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7462#issuecomment-122782276
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#issuecomment-122783241
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#issuecomment-122783251
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#issuecomment-122783130
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7462#issuecomment-122784721
Please resolve the merge conflict if you can. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7462#discussion_r34972154
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ def _():
This is equivalent to the PERCENT_RANK function in SQL.,
}
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7336#issuecomment-122784742
@rxin, yes we found this issue when do dynamic partitioning in our case, so
here i do local sort data on the partition columns to reduce the gc overhead.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122785355
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122785576
[Test build #37817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37817/console)
for PR 7453 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122785341
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122785499
[Test build #37818 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37818/consoleFull)
for PR 7442 at commit
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7531#discussion_r34972744
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -556,6 +556,16 @@ case class
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7467#issuecomment-122786735
I believe this PR/JIRA should be closed as a duplicate
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sixers commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7499#issuecomment-122788836
@JoshRosen
I see, thanks for suggestion, I added this test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user carsonwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7526#issuecomment-122791974
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7533#issuecomment-122805824
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7532#issuecomment-122805842
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7524#discussion_r34969879
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ trait SchemaRelationProvider {
*
* The
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7524#issuecomment-122773205
[Test build #37806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37806/consoleFull)
for PR 7524 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7523#discussion_r34969987
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/nullFunctions.scala
---
@@ -198,14 +203,39 @@ case class AtLeastNNonNulls(n:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-122773289
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7365#issuecomment-122773507
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7525
[SPARK-9186][SQL] make deterministic describing the tree rather than the
expression
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7524
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7525#issuecomment-122773813
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7525#issuecomment-122773807
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#discussion_r34970391
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeRowSerializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tarekauel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7516#issuecomment-122774605
Sure. I am going to solve some of them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#discussion_r34970544
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeRowSerializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#discussion_r34971118
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/JobWaiter.scala ---
@@ -50,28 +72,23 @@ private[spark] class JobWaiter[T](
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7527#issuecomment-122781817
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4380#issuecomment-122782563
[Test build #37815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37815/consoleFull)
for PR 4380 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7528#issuecomment-122782409
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7528#issuecomment-122782396
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#issuecomment-122783459
[Test build #37816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37816/consoleFull)
for PR 7399 at commit
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7210#issuecomment-122786160
@liancheng I see `coalesce` will take locality and load balance(the number
of partitions in each group) into
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7529#issuecomment-122786198
[Test build #37820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37820/consoleFull)
for PR 7529 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7531#discussion_r34972652
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -556,6 +556,16 @@ case class StringSpace(child:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-122788178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-122788052
[Test build #37807 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37807/console)
for PR 7417 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7516#issuecomment-122794063
[Test build #1116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1116/console)
for PR 7516 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122800414
[Test build #37818 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37818/console)
for PR 7442 at commit
Github user tarekauel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7531#issuecomment-122800467
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7154#issuecomment-122800067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7154#issuecomment-122799420
[Test build #37812 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37812/console)
for PR 7154 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7523#issuecomment-122772598
While you are at this, can you add some unit test for the AtLeastNNonNulls
expression to NullFunctionsSuite?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-122773389
[Test build #37807 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37807/consoleFull)
for PR 7417 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-122773299
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7516#issuecomment-122774362
I triggered it finally. Meantime, if you have time, do you want to pick up
some other issues here? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8829
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7516#issuecomment-122774336
[Test build #1116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1116/consoleFull)
for PR 7516 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7424#discussion_r34970834
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/NewHadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ class NewHadoopRDD[K, V](
override def hasNext: Boolean
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122778570
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122778962
[Test build #37813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37813/consoleFull)
for PR 7442 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7424#issuecomment-122778668
cc @zsxwing for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122778516
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7424#discussion_r34973826
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/NewHadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -159,7 +164,10 @@ class NewHadoopRDD[K, V](
private def close() {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#discussion_r34973871
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -906,12 +908,16 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
/**
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7503#issuecomment-122804300
@brkyvz is this OK with you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7523#discussion_r34969931
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/nullFunctions.scala
---
@@ -198,14 +203,39 @@ case class AtLeastNNonNulls(n:
Github user tarekauel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7516#issuecomment-122773919
@rxin Jenkins still doesn't like me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-122776730
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-122776686
[Test build #37805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37805/console)
for PR 7259 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7458#issuecomment-122777013
[Test build #37804 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37804/console)
for PR 7458 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7458#issuecomment-122777314
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user tarekauel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7527
[SPARK-9153][SQL] codegen StirngLPad/StringRPad
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9153
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122784786
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122784796
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7462#discussion_r34972139
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -196,6 +200,8 @@ def _():
globals()[_name] = since(1.4)(_create_binary_mathfunction(_name, _doc))
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7462#discussion_r34972186
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7526#issuecomment-122784957
CC @kayousterhout
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7531#issuecomment-122786056
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7529#issuecomment-122786084
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7530#issuecomment-122786059
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user tarekauel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7531
[SPARK-9155][SQL] codegen StringSpace
Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9155
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7530#issuecomment-122786072
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7529#issuecomment-122786064
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user evacchi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6356#issuecomment-122785825
ok, will check today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SaintBacchus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#discussion_r34973017
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -906,12 +908,16 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7526#issuecomment-122795497
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SaintBacchus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7442#issuecomment-122800806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7523#issuecomment-122772382
Jenkins, ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7509#issuecomment-122772372
There is a failure
```
[error] Test org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8StringSuite.concatTest
failed: java.lang.NullPointerException: null
[error] at
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7259#issuecomment-122772380
[Test build #37805 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37805/consoleFull)
for PR 7259 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7365#issuecomment-122773454
[Test build #37800 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37800/console)
for PR 7365 at commit
1 - 100 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
