Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8109#issuecomment-130322209
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#discussion_r36866693
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -224,6 +225,56 @@ case class Limit(limit: Int, child:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7957#issuecomment-130323787
[Test build #40634 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40634/consoleFull)
for PR 7957 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130324459
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130324416
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-130324603
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7014#issuecomment-130336611
merged to master 1.5 thanks @tomwhite !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7014
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7957#issuecomment-130336696
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7957#issuecomment-130336619
[Test build #40634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40634/console)
for PR 7957 at commit
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7966#issuecomment-130337132
Sorry for that. I was following [this
line](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala#L774)
which doesn't seem to
Github user michellemay commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8109#issuecomment-130340256
@vanzin about your comment on ShutdownHookManager, should I rename it?
Also, while refactoring calls to Utils.addShutdownHook, I've seen instances
of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130341196
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8113#discussion_r36873052
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -130,24 +147,67 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8113#discussion_r36873218
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -130,24 +147,67 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7957#issuecomment-130321856
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8109#issuecomment-130321985
[Test build #40624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40624/console)
for PR 8109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-130322961
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128
[SPARK-9879][SQL] Fix OOM in Limit clause with large number
```
create table tablsetest as select * from dpa_ord_bill_tf order by member_id
limit 2000
```
It causes OOM,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7957#issuecomment-130322990
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-130322991
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7957#issuecomment-130322966
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#discussion_r36867308
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -224,6 +225,56 @@ case class Limit(limit: Int, child:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130326577
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130336313
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#discussion_r36866531
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
column based
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130324170
cc @JoshRosen @cloud-fan @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#issuecomment-130331352
Hey @tgravescs , sorry for the late response. Absolutely, it would be
great to get you to start testing this. I'm a bit overloaded at the moment but
probably next
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130335280
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8010#discussion_r36870595
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8128#issuecomment-130336342
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7943#discussion_r36873941
--- Diff:
network/shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolver.java
---
@@ -252,4 +338,118 @@ public String toString()
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8113#issuecomment-130343660
One more small thing. We should probably also add the ```ignoreNulls```
option to the ```first``` and ```last``` dataframe functions.
---
If your project is set up
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7913#discussion_r36874133
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -67,69 +62,73 @@ class ReceiverTrackerSuite extends
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7913#issuecomment-130344159
I'm late to the party, I have a few minor comments but other unworthy
nitpicks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7820#discussion_r36875672
--- Diff: sbin/start-mesos-shuffle-service.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8135#issuecomment-130434484
[Test build #40657 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40657/consoleFull)
for PR 8135 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8130#issuecomment-130439128
[Test build #40660 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40660/consoleFull)
for PR 8130 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130451987
[Test build #1503 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1503/consoleFull)
for PR 8111 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130452075
[Test build #1505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1505/consoleFull)
for PR 8111 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130452048
[Test build #1504 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1504/consoleFull)
for PR 8111 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130451965
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8136#issuecomment-130453618
[Test build #40665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40665/consoleFull)
for PR 8136 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8127#issuecomment-130453661
@jerryshao weird, I've been running this and it works for me. How did you
reproduce it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8079#issuecomment-130453515
@dbtsai Thanks for checking this! I'll go ahead and merge it with master
and branch-1.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8137#issuecomment-130457813
[Test build #40668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40668/consoleFull)
for PR 8137 at commit
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8142
[SPARK-9913] [MLLIB] LDAUtils should be private
@feynmanliang
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mengxr/spark SPARK-9913
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8144#issuecomment-130467782
[Test build #40675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40675/consoleFull)
for PR 8144 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8136#discussion_r36922780
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -282,26 +282,31 @@ object PrefixSpan extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8130#issuecomment-130467602
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8143#issuecomment-130467578
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8087#issuecomment-130467593
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8087#issuecomment-130467967
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8148
[SPARK-9918] [MLLIB] remove runs from k-means in the pipeline API
This requires some discussion. I'm not sure whether `runs` is a useful
parameter. It certainly complicates the implementation. We
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130470329
[Test build #1504 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1504/console)
for PR 8111 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8148#issuecomment-130471360
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8135#issuecomment-130471550
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8129#issuecomment-130473133
[Test build #40686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40686/console)
for PR 8129 at commit
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8149
[SPARK-9908] [SQL] When spark.sql.tungsten.enabled is false, broadcast join
does not work
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9908
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7751#issuecomment-130473074
[Test build #40689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40689/consoleFull)
for PR 7751 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8129#issuecomment-130473135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8149#issuecomment-130475457
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8150
[SPARK-9920] [SQL] The simpleString of TungstenAggregate does not show its
output
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9920
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130475536
Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r11, 12 of 12 files at r12, 1 of 1 files at r13.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#discussion_r36927123
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SharedSQLContext.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8152#issuecomment-130483255
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8137#issuecomment-130483271
LGTM, merging to master and 1.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8152#issuecomment-130483499
[Test build #40695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40695/consoleFull)
for PR 8152 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8136#issuecomment-130488995
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8153#issuecomment-130488984
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8136#issuecomment-130489011
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user mindprince opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8153
[SPARK-9924] [WEB UI] Don't schedule checkForLogs while some of them are
already running.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8151#issuecomment-130488833
[Test build #40698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40698/consoleFull)
for PR 8151 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8127#issuecomment-130490405
@andrewor14 , I just started a local pseudo standalone cluster in my
machine with master and worker in one machine, and then submitted a simple
SparkPi application
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8151#issuecomment-130490890
[Test build #40701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40701/consoleFull)
for PR 8151 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130490661
[Test build #1518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1518/consoleFull)
for PR 8111 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8135#issuecomment-130431170
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8124#issuecomment-130431556
[Test build #40656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40656/consoleFull)
for PR 8124 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7557#issuecomment-130439551
In Spark 1.4, `first` and `last` were not in function registry. Right now,
`first_value` and `last_value` are pointing to Hive's `first_value` and
`last_value`,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8116#issuecomment-130446213
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user badriub commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7652#discussion_r36916725
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/OneVsRest.scala ---
@@ -127,10 +128,16 @@ final class OneVsRestModel private[ml] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8137#issuecomment-130457314
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8127#issuecomment-130457358
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8137#issuecomment-130457327
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8130#issuecomment-130465332
[Test build #1501 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1501/console)
for PR 8130 at commit
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8141
[SPARK-9915] [ML] stopWords should use StringArrayParam
@hhbyyh
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mengxr/spark SPARK-9915
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8139#issuecomment-130464972
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8142#issuecomment-130466235
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8141#issuecomment-130466170
[Test build #40673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40673/consoleFull)
for PR 8141 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8134#issuecomment-130466459
**[Test build #40654 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40654/console)**
for PR 8134 at commit
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8143
[SPARK-9914] [ML] define setters explicitly for Java and use setParam group
in RFormula
The problem with defining setters in the base class is that it doesn't
return the correct type in Java.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8134#issuecomment-130466537
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8139#issuecomment-130466394
[Test build #40671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40671/consoleFull)
for PR 8139 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8145#issuecomment-130468877
[Test build #40680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40680/consoleFull)
for PR 8145 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8111#issuecomment-130468805
[Test build #1505 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1505/console)
for PR 8111 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7751#issuecomment-130472615
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8136#discussion_r36925179
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -282,26 +282,31 @@ object PrefixSpan extends Logging {
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8148#issuecomment-130472616
LGTM, except that the Scala doc for class KMeans needs to be updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8140#issuecomment-130474770
[Test build #40672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40672/console)
for PR 8140 at commit
1 - 100 of 1198 matches
Mail list logo
