Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151349717
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151353260
**[Test build #44392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44392/consoleFull)**
for PR 9214 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#discussion_r43079819
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/FileBasedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ private[streaming] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#issuecomment-151357041
**[Test build #44394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44394/consoleFull)**
for PR 9285 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151357523
**[Test build #44396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44396/consoleFull)**
for PR 9214 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151357533
**[Test build #44395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44395/consoleFull)**
for PR 9283 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151357536
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151357535
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151357246
**[Test build #44395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44395/consoleFull)**
for PR 9283 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9288#issuecomment-151361248
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9288#issuecomment-151361217
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151363072
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151363088
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-151363719
Hi @srowen @patrungel @JoshRosen and @vazin, I changed this patch to honor
`SPARK_HOME` to solve symlink issue, if users want to run the executables from
symlink,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151364307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151364279
**[Test build #44398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44398/consoleFull)**
for PR 9283 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9283#issuecomment-151364308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#issuecomment-151367268
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#issuecomment-151367266
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9266
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9275#issuecomment-151372540
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9193#issuecomment-151375443
@shivaram, for your suggestion that "we should a make a list of functions
that we mask and are incompatible", I submitted
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151377012
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151377023
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-151378251
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9290#issuecomment-151378199
**[Test build #44405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44405/consoleFull)**
for PR 9290 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9292#issuecomment-151378260
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-151378254
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9292#issuecomment-151378248
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-151378261
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9292#issuecomment-151379305
**[Test build #44407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44407/consoleFull)**
for PR 9292 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151379732
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151379733
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9290#issuecomment-151379993
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9290#issuecomment-151380063
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user wulei-bj-cn commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#issuecomment-151339424
Dear all,
@andrewor14 @sryza @cmccabe would you plz help take a look at this issue ?
Thanks so much !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9226#issuecomment-151340845
**[Test build #44389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44389/consoleFull)**
for PR 9226 at commit
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9268
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user manygrams commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9236#issuecomment-151351506
@tdas fixed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151353519
**[Test build #44392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44392/consoleFull)**
for PR 9214 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151353522
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9236#issuecomment-151353336
**[Test build #44393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44393/consoleFull)**
for PR 9236 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9214#issuecomment-151353521
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#discussion_r43079268
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/WriteAheadLogUtils.scala
---
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ private[streaming] object
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151354173
LGTM. Thank you for working on it. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#discussion_r43079685
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/WriteAheadLogUtils.scala
---
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ private[streaming] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9236#issuecomment-151358902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9236#issuecomment-151358616
**[Test build #44393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44393/consoleFull)**
for PR 9236 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-151362354
Had an offline discussion with @yhuai. We can remove `fetch_aggregate` from
whitelist. We already tested all the functions there in SQL queries. We can
create a new JIRA
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9193#issuecomment-151366290
Hmm I see. In the case of `lag` I can see your point. But at a high level I
think we should a make a list of functions that we mask and are incompatible
(i.e. things
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9193
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9285#issuecomment-151366860
**[Test build #44394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44394/consoleFull)**
for PR 9285 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9275#issuecomment-151372561
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9275#issuecomment-151372367
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8935#issuecomment-151376098
@hiross Sorry for my slow response! Please check the public API instead of
line changes. The former is more accurate. The PR has merge conflicts with the
master branch.
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151376631
Rebased to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9265#issuecomment-151376585
@mengxr The simplest way to change the view is adding a css font constrain:
```css
div .highlight pre {
font-size: 12px;
}
```
It
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#issuecomment-151377956
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9292
[SPARK-11341][SQL] Given non-zero ordinal toRow in the encoders of
primitive types will cause problem
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11341
The toRow in LongEncoder,
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9292#issuecomment-151378144
ping @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9265#issuecomment-151378091
**[Test build #44406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44406/consoleFull)**
for PR 9265 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9265#issuecomment-151379574
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9265#issuecomment-151379573
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9218#issuecomment-151379530
@sun-rui That's a great point, `coltypes()` as its signature is defined,
would only return a list of simple types.
But how would one create a DataFrame with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151379670
**[Test build #44404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44404/consoleFull)**
for PR 9196 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9265#issuecomment-151379513
**[Test build #44406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44406/consoleFull)**
for PR 9265 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9280#issuecomment-151243209
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9280#issuecomment-151243208
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9226#discussion_r43035743
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -218,25 +233,19 @@ private[hive] class HiveMetastoreCatalog(val
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9226#issuecomment-151247022
Overall loos good! Left two minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9226#discussion_r43036472
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -744,32 +744,6 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-151248172
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-151248176
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-151248009
**[Test build #44366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44366/consoleFull)**
for PR 9003 at commit
GitHub user aslesarenko opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9284
[SQL][DOC] Minor document fixes in interfaces.scala
@rxin just noticed this while reading the code.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151145666
Thomas: been through the hive versions and they didn't pull anything,
simply added another overloaded method before the existing three. Probably a
latent bug in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9223#issuecomment-151149139
**[Test build #44353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44353/consoleFull)**
for PR 9223 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9223#issuecomment-151149341
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9258#issuecomment-151149704
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#discussion_r42999614
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -365,33 +366,37 @@ private[spark] class SecurityManager(sparkConf:
SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151160221
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151163267
**[Test build #44356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44356/consoleFull)**
for PR 9249 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151132336
can you update jira and this pr to include which version of hive changed
the interface?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151140385
Thomas, I'm not sure that they actually pulled something, but instead
overloaded the get() operation, which confused the reflection logic.
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9279#issuecomment-151156053
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9279#issuecomment-151156050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151163274
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151163276
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#discussion_r43004016
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -245,4 +247,28 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9279#issuecomment-151155459
**[Test build #44351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44351/consoleFull)**
for PR 9279 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#discussion_r43000107
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -365,33 +366,37 @@ private[spark] class SecurityManager(sparkConf:
SparkConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9258#issuecomment-151154443
**[Test build #44355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44355/consoleFull)**
for PR 9258 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151160168
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#discussion_r43003681
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -365,33 +366,37 @@ private[spark] class SecurityManager(sparkConf:
SparkConf)
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#discussion_r43003603
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -245,4 +247,28 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite
Github user nitin2goyal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9253#issuecomment-151167900
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9258#issuecomment-151149827
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9223#issuecomment-151149345
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9249#issuecomment-151162581
**[Test build #44356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44356/consoleFull)**
for PR 9249 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9279#discussion_r42985435
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -513,3 +513,16 @@ case class MapGroups[K, T,
401 - 500 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
