Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152177498
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152177512
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9258#issuecomment-152178180
**[Test build #44590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44590/consoleFull)**
for PR 9258 at commit
[`824be91`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9258#issuecomment-152178361
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9339#issuecomment-152178217
That's a known flaky pyspark test. Change LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9258#issuecomment-152178362
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152179279
**[Test build #44597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44597/consoleFull)**
for PR 9340 at commit
[`ab42465`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152179761
**[Test build #44597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44597/consoleFull)**
for PR 9340 at commit
[`ab42465`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152179766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152179768
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9282#issuecomment-152180069
The serializer is delegating to the context class loader for instantiating
classes it receives on the wire. When this class loader is missing (`null`),
the JVM looks up t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152180307
**[Test build #44589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44589/consoleFull)**
for PR 9291 at commit
[`8bcb3dc`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152180565
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152180570
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user JasmineGeorge commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-152181045
Sorry I can't get to it until next Wednesday.. Can someone else take over
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152181074
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152181139
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user jacek-lewandowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354
SPARK-11402: Use ChildRunnerProvider to create ExecutorRunner and
DriverRunner
Abstracted ExecutorRunner and DriverRunner. The current implementations
were renamed to ExecutorRunnerImpl a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-152182642
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-152182613
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-152183365
**[Test build #44599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44599/consoleFull)**
for PR 9354 at commit
[`a2d2ec8`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152183305
**[Test build #44598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44598/consoleFull)**
for PR 9340 at commit
[`ab31ba4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152183885
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152183889
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152183879
**[Test build #44598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44598/consoleFull)**
for PR 9340 at commit
[`ab31ba4`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9282#issuecomment-152186265
**[Test build #44591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44591/consoleFull)**
for PR 9282 at commit
[`ec1c11b`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9282#issuecomment-152187108
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9282#issuecomment-152187102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-152188763
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-152188739
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152188764
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152188726
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152188733
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user justinuang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8592#issuecomment-152189895
@rxin I would really like to see this merged in as well. I agree with
@nburoojy that collect_as_list and collect_as_set will always have issues if
the size of one lis
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r43387529
--- Diff: yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -164,6 +164,113 @@
+
+
--- End diff --
not tested that actually. Do you
GitHub user darabos opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355
[SPARK-11403] Log something when killing executors due to OOME
Without anything printed it's very hard to figure out why the executor
disappeared.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPAR
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9007#issuecomment-152190436
@tdas what do you think? just trying to get some resolution on this and I
know you wanted to think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r43387678
--- Diff:
yarn/src/history/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1328 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9281
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r43388210
--- Diff:
yarn/src/history/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1328 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8669#discussion_r43388323
--- Diff: sbin/start-slaves.sh ---
@@ -52,11 +51,11 @@ if [ "$SPARK_MASTER_IP" = "" ]; then
fi
if [ "$START_TACHYON" == "true" ]; then
- "$
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r43388336
--- Diff:
yarn/src/history/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnTimelineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,757 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#discussion_r43388459
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregates.scala
---
@@ -991,3 +991,73 @@ case class StddevFunction(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9339
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-152192810
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-152192812
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152192889
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152192891
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152193195
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9339#issuecomment-152192964
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-152193338
Do you mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#discussion_r43389586
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportFrameDecoder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5664#issuecomment-152194366
@WangTaoTheTonic can you rebase and squash?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#discussion_r43390028
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ object YarnSparkHadoopUtil {
if (Utils.is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152194084
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152194014
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152196306
**[Test build #44602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44602/consoleFull)**
for PR 9355 at commit
[`69f263b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9253#issuecomment-152196492
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9253#issuecomment-152196489
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9253#issuecomment-152196314
**[Test build #44592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44592/consoleFull)**
for PR 9253 at commit
[`6a9f738`](https://git
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9299#discussion_r43390777
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ApplicationInfo.scala ---
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationInfo(
val des
GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9356
SPARK-11348 Replace addOnCompleteCallback with addTaskCompletionListeâ¦
â¦ner() in UnsafeExternalSorter
When practicing the command from SPARK-11318, I got the following:
```
[WARNIN
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9326#issuecomment-152201027
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9356#issuecomment-152201206
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9356#issuecomment-152201243
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user darabos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#discussion_r43393025
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ object YarnSparkHadoopUtil {
if (Utils.i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9326
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9299#discussion_r43393292
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ApplicationInfo.scala ---
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationInfo(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152202530
**[Test build #44602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44602/consoleFull)**
for PR 9355 at commit
[`69f263b`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152202678
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9355#issuecomment-152202681
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
GitHub user saurfang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9357
Fix typo in AggregationQuerySuite.scala
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/saurfang/spark patch-1
Alternatively you can review an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9356#issuecomment-152205856
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9357#issuecomment-152205717
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9356#issuecomment-152205854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9357#issuecomment-152205757
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#discussion_r43395471
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportResponseHandler.java
---
@@ -50,6 +55,8 @@
private final Map outs
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#discussion_r43395619
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -524,6 +525,133 @@ case class Sum(child: Expr
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#discussion_r43395797
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/AggregationQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -556,6 +556,33 @@ abstract class AggregationQuerySuit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8587#discussion_r43395879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -524,6 +525,133 @@ case class Sum(child: Expr
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9105#issuecomment-152207882
I am going to pick it in branch 1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9105#issuecomment-152208196
OK done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9357#issuecomment-152207971
**[Test build #44604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44604/consoleFull)**
for PR 9357 at commit
[`a115242`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-152209437
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-152209172
**[Test build #44595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44595/consoleFull)**
for PR 9003 at commit
[`ff363cc`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-152209441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-152210892
**[Test build #44599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44599/consoleFull)**
for PR 9354 at commit
[`a2d2ec8`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-152211022
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-152211020
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43398228
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -37,3 +35,39 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
Github user pravingadakh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9340#issuecomment-152211342
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43398352
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDatasetSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358
[SPARK-11269][SQL][WIP] Java API support & test cases
I followed `DataFrame` to add java friendly methods in `Dataset`, but
should we create a `JavaDataset` like `JavaRDD`? Actually `Dataset` like
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#issuecomment-152212849
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#issuecomment-152212904
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#discussion_r43398814
--- Diff:
network/common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportFrameDecoderSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#issuecomment-152214696
**[Test build #44605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44605/consoleFull)**
for PR 9358 at commit
[`c0fa79e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9359#issuecomment-152214833
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9359
[SPARK-11404] [SQL] Support for groupBy using column expressions
This PR adds a new method `groupBy(cols: Column*)` to `Dataset` that allows
users to group using column expressions instead of a lam
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#issuecomment-152215296
**[Test build #44605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44605/consoleFull)**
for PR 9358 at commit
[`c0fa79e`](https://git
201 - 300 of 972 matches
Mail list logo
