Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202968892
**[Test build #54443 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54443/consoleFull)**
for PR 11991 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57748633
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ abstract class OutputWriter {
*
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202998070
**[Test build #54445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54445/consoleFull)**
for PR 12039 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#issuecomment-202948797
**[Test build #54441 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54441/consoleFull)**
for PR 12038 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57747923
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +93,46 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11278#issuecomment-202976430
Ok - I can close this if we think thats going to be fixed soon (e.g. before
the next release).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#discussion_r57756896
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -241,73 +256,89 @@ private[sql] case class DataSourceScan(
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12017#issuecomment-202991498
@davies Yea. The format allows at most 1 dictionary per column per row
group. Each page can have a different encoding though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9158#discussion_r57759943
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/Pipeline.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,15 @@ class Pipeline(override val uid: String) extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12040#issuecomment-202997658
**[Test build #54448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54448/consoleFull)**
for PR 12040 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039
[SPARK-14059] [ML] [SparkR] Define and use KMeansWrapper for SparkR::kmeans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Define and use ```KMeansWrapper``` for ```SparkR::kmeans```.
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12040
[SPARK-14244][SQL][WIP] Don't use SizeBasedWindowFunction.n created on
executor side when evaluating window functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12040#issuecomment-202997227
Just came to a simpler and less error prone solution after opening this PR:
we may reserve an expression ID range, say 0 ~ 1024, for predefined global
attribute
GitHub user liyezhang556520 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038
[SPARK-14242][CORE][Network] avoid using compositeBuffer for frame decoder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this patch, we avoid using `compositeBuffer` in
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11954#issuecomment-202981052
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57752853
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApplicationListResource.scala
---
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ private[spark] object
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57759347
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +93,46 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57760761
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -49,14 +49,10 @@ object CSVRelation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-202961179
**[Test build #54442 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54442/consoleFull)**
for PR 12036 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-202962322
**[Test build #54442 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54442/consoleFull)**
for PR 12036 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-202962331
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-202962334
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202973142
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202973138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11876#issuecomment-202981864
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11954
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11871#issuecomment-202981940
**[Test build #54446 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54446/consoleFull)**
for PR 11871 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57755370
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -49,14 +49,10 @@ object CSVRelation extends
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-202995487
That seems like a pretty reasonable change, although it might be good to
add a regression test. Maybe @davies or @JoshRosen can verify this patch for
Jenkins?
---
If
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57759763
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ abstract class OutputWriter {
*
*
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#discussion_r57741705
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportFrameDecoder.java
---
@@ -139,14 +139,18 @@ private ByteBuf
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57748886
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -112,8 +105,9 @@ private[sql] object
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11964#issuecomment-202972522
Thank you, @MLnick .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202972705
**[Test build #5 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 12039 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11871#issuecomment-202979360
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-202948702
The failed tests are due to describe function DDL command. Let me fix it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#discussion_r57742478
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportFrameDecoder.java
---
@@ -139,14 +139,18 @@ private ByteBuf
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57747605
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApplicationListResource.scala
---
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ private[spark] object
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57747564
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -112,8 +105,9 @@ private[sql] object
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307#discussion_r57751258
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -164,6 +165,14 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202981925
**[Test build #54445 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54445/consoleFull)**
for PR 12039 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11876#issuecomment-202983735
**[Test build #54447 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54447/consoleFull)**
for PR 11876 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202998298
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202998296
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57760192
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -49,14 +49,10 @@ object CSVRelation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-202973132
**[Test build #5 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 12039 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57760314
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -112,8 +105,9 @@ private[sql] object
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202726994
@mengxr This was actually easier when ```labels``` was stored as a Param;
that made save/load handle it automatically. I just changed it to store labels
as a
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#issuecomment-202727113
@davies This is rebased. Please take a look. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202727216
**[Test build #54413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54413/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
Github user liyintang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12026#issuecomment-203010916
I thought the back pressure/flow control handles how many message to fetch,
not when to start to generate the job. IMHO, adding the jitter in the start
time is more
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#discussion_r57770133
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -86,13 +87,50 @@ case class DescribeDatabase(
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12016#discussion_r57773320
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/BoundedDouble.scala
---
@@ -21,5 +21,20 @@ package org.apache.spark.partial
* A Double value with
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10900#issuecomment-203038434
also cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-203061970
sorry haven't had time to look at this yet, hopefully in a day or so
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57787998
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -70,12 +70,28 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder extends AstBuilder
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11980#issuecomment-203069529
**[Test build #54457 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54457/consoleFull)**
for PR 11980 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12042
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#discussion_r57791722
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AlterTableAlterViewCommandParser.scala
---
@@ -29,22 +29,26 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#discussion_r57792823
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AlterTableAlterViewCommandParser.scala
---
@@ -29,22 +29,26 @@ import
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11985#issuecomment-203062646
Could you please modify a unit test to set the seed so we test this code
path?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-203065118
There are some integration tests hosted in an separate repo by the
Databricks people at https://github.com/databricks/spark-integration-tests ,
I'm not super sure on
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12025#issuecomment-203067133
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57786921
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ng/SqlBase.g4
---
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ statement
| DROP TEMPORARY?
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57787715
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -70,12 +70,28 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder extends AstBuilder
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12041#issuecomment-203068919
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12042#issuecomment-203068947
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-203076036
ttp
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#discussion_r57792101
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AlterTableAlterViewCommandParser.scala
---
@@ -29,22 +29,26 @@ import
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#discussion_r57793017
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSqlParser.scala
---
@@ -21,27 +21,28 @@ import
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#discussion_r57768696
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -17,14 +17,116 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.util
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12029#issuecomment-203030872
Thanks, merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12030#issuecomment-203039591
do we have a test case for data that some of them fit in a decimal and some
don't?
i want to make sure we have a rule to coerce decimal + double into just
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12030#discussion_r57774941
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/InferSchema.scala
---
@@ -135,11 +136,15 @@ private[sql] object InferSchema
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-203017554
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760#issuecomment-203033853
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760#issuecomment-203034733
**[Test build #54450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54450/consoleFull)**
for PR 11760 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12042
[MINOR][SQL] Fix typos by replacing 'much' with 'match'.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes two trivial typos: 'does not **much**' --> 'does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11876#issuecomment-203042616
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11876#issuecomment-203042612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11876#issuecomment-203042353
**[Test build #54447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54447/consoleFull)**
for PR 11876 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12034#issuecomment-203057456
I think you'll need to close this PR manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12044#issuecomment-203060691
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12044#issuecomment-203061535
**[Test build #54455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54455/consoleFull)**
for PR 12044 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-203061073
I made a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11985#issuecomment-203068427
Sure, will do it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12041#issuecomment-203068543
**[Test build #54449 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54449/consoleFull)**
for PR 12041 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12023#discussion_r57787829
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -240,12 +250,66 @@ final class
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12041#issuecomment-203069324
@dongjoon-hyun it might be good if you can batch of these typos or minor
cleansup into a single pr in the future. Thanks!
Merging in master.
---
If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57788225
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -70,12 +70,28 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder extends AstBuilder {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12044#discussion_r57788333
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeFormatter.scala
---
@@ -49,8 +49,11 @@ private class CodeFormatter
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12023#discussion_r57788687
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -240,12 +250,66 @@ final class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57788838
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMasterArguments.scala
---
@@ -101,12 +91,8 @@ class ApplicationMasterArguments(val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12017#issuecomment-203072990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57789745
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -350,6 +354,34 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760#issuecomment-203087196
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12042#issuecomment-203087215
**[Test build #54452 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54452/consoleFull)**
for PR 12042 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760#issuecomment-203087194
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57795477
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -350,6 +354,34 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#issuecomment-203103180
**[Test build #54454 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54454/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
1 - 100 of 671 matches
Mail list logo
